Vidya Raghavan, Khosla Muskaan, Laws Siobhan, Harvey James, Kaushik Monika, Mullapudi Naga A, Macmillan Douglas
Breast Surgery, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.
Breast Surgery, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.
Surgeon. 2023 Apr;21(2):128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 May 9.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an accurate and reliable method for staging the axilla in early breast cancer. The gold standard technique for localizing the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is the use of radioisotope with or without blue dye. However, this technique has its limitations. Various alternatives have been explored to overcome the disadvantages of the standard SLNB technique and superparamagnetic iron oxide mapping agents have garnered significant attention. The SMART study aims to compare the magnetic technique using the superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (SPIO, Sienna+®) to the radioisotope technique (Tc99) +/- blue dye, for SLN identification in patients with early breast cancer.
A prospective, multicenter study was done that recruited 109 clinically node-negative early-stage breast cancer patients from five centres in the United Kingdom (UK). The patients received radioisotope ± blue dye injections, followed by intraoperative injection of magnetic tracer prior to SLNB. The sentinel node identification rate was compared between the magnetic and standard techniques to evaluate detection rate (per patient and per node), non-inferiority and concordance.
Data was analysed for 107 patients. The per patient detection rate was 98.13% (105/107) when using the magnetic tracer and 92.26% (103/107) when using the standard technique. The nodal detection rate was 93.07% (188/202 nodes) when using the magnetic tracer and 96.53% (195/202) when using the standard technique. Of the 31 patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), all 31 (100%) were detected by both techniques.
Our study demonstrates that the magnetic technique is a feasible method for SLNB, with an identification rate that is not inferior to the standard technique. The magnetic technique offers a suitable alternative to the standard technique thereby avoiding the need for the complexities of nuclear medicine, the hazards of radiation and the anaphylaxis risk of blue dye.
前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)是早期乳腺癌腋窝分期的一种准确且可靠的方法。定位前哨淋巴结(SLN)的金标准技术是使用放射性同位素,可加用或不加用蓝色染料。然而,该技术存在局限性。人们探索了各种替代方法以克服标准SLNB技术的缺点,超顺磁性氧化铁标记剂已引起了广泛关注。SMART研究旨在比较使用超顺磁性氧化铁颗粒(SPIO,Sienna+®)的磁性技术与放射性同位素技术(Tc99)加/不加蓝色染料在早期乳腺癌患者中识别SLN的效果。
开展了一项前瞻性多中心研究,从英国的五个中心招募了109例临床腋窝淋巴结阴性的早期乳腺癌患者。患者接受放射性同位素加/不加蓝色染料注射,随后在进行SLNB之前术中注射磁性示踪剂。比较磁性技术与标准技术在前哨淋巴结识别率方面的差异,以评估检测率(每位患者和每个淋巴结)、非劣效性和一致性。
对107例患者的数据进行了分析。使用磁性示踪剂时每位患者的检测率为98.13%(105/107),使用标准技术时为92.26%(103/107)。使用磁性示踪剂时淋巴结检测率为93.07%(188/202个淋巴结),使用标准技术时为96.53%(195/202)。在31例前哨淋巴结阳性的患者中,两种技术均检测到了所有31例(100%)。
我们的研究表明,磁性技术是一种可行的SLNB方法,其识别率不低于标准技术。磁性技术为标准技术提供了合适的替代方案,从而避免了核医学的复杂性、辐射危害以及蓝色染料的过敏风险。