Weaver Adam P, Kuenze Christopher M, Roman Dylan, Giampetruzzi Nicholas, Link Meredith, Martinez Alexa, Rucinski Kylee, Kupperman Natalie, Phan Lucy, Prati Victor V, Walker Cody, Douthit Taylor, Cage Dhalston, Abt John, Greenberg Elliot, Ganley Theodore, LaPlante Stephen, Pace Lee, Farmer Brooke, Grindstaff Terry L, Butler Lauren, Chang Edward, Cherelstein Rachel, Grozier Corey D, Harkey Matthew, Parmar Arjun, Landers Jacob, Ulman Sophia, Harrison Chelsea, DeFroda Steven, Ma Richard, Reiche Elaine, Brinkman Caitlin, Birchmeier Tom, Baez Shelby, Hart Joseph M, Walaszek Michelle, Cross Kevin, Thompson Xavier
Connecticut Children's, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 May 12;13(5):23259671251334143. doi: 10.1177/23259671251334143. eCollection 2025 May.
Graft selection can influence strength and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in adults undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Yet, there is a lack of high-quality evidence comparing these results in adolescents.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to determine differences in quadriceps and hamstring strength and PROs between adolescents with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), quadriceps tendon (QT), and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts. It was hypothesized that patients with QT and BPTB grafts would have greater impairments in knee extension, patients with HT grafts would have greater impairments in knee flexion, but PROs would be similar between graft types.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
A total of 522 adolescents (mean age, 16.8 ± 1.8 years; 55% female) completed isokinetic knee strength testing at 60 deg/s, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form, the pediatric IKDC (Pedi-IKDC) subjective knee form, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale at 7.8 ± 1.5 months after ACLR. Weight-normalized strength was compared via linear mixed-effects models, and PROs were compared between graft types with the Kruskal-Wallis test.
After controlling for age, sex, time since surgery, and assessment site, patients with BPTB grafts had 10.8% less quadriceps strength in the ACLR limb ( = .05) than patients with QT grafts and 20.4% less quadriceps strength ( < .001) than patients with HT grafts, while patients with HT grafts had 9.6% more quadriceps strength ( = .01) than patients with QT grafts. Patients with BPTB grafts had 3.1% more hamstring strength ( < .01) than patients with QT grafts and 7.0% more hamstring strength ( < .001) than patients with HT grafts. Patients with HT grafts had 10.8% less hamstring strength ( < .01) than patients with QT grafts. Patients with QT grafts had lower IKDC scores (-7.2%; < .001) than patients with HT grafts and higher KOOS Sports scores (+4.5%; < .001) than patients with BPTB grafts. Patients with HT grafts had higher IKDC scores (+5.4%; < .001) and higher KOOS Sports scores (+5.1%; < .01) than patients with BPTB grafts. There were no differences in ACL-RSI scores ( = .37).
At 6 to 12 months after ACLR, patients with QT or BPTB grafts had worse normalized quadriceps strength but greater hamstring strength than patients with HT grafts. PROs were mixed, with no differences seen in ACL-RSI scores, but patients with HT grafts displayed greater self-reported function and a greater ability to participate in sport.
在接受前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)的成年人中,移植物的选择会影响膝关节强度和患者报告结局(PROs)。然而,缺乏高质量证据来比较青少年中的这些结果。
目的/假设:本研究的目的是确定采用骨-髌腱-骨(BPTB)、股四头肌肌腱(QT)和腘绳肌肌腱(HT)自体移植物的青少年在股四头肌和腘绳肌力量以及PROs方面的差异。研究假设为,采用QT和BPTB移植物的患者在膝关节伸展方面的损伤更大,采用HT移植物的患者在膝关节屈曲方面的损伤更大,但不同移植物类型的PROs相似。
队列研究;证据等级,3级。
共有522名青少年(平均年龄16.8±1.8岁;55%为女性)在ACLR术后7.8±1.5个月时完成了60°/s等速膝关节力量测试、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观膝关节量表、儿童IKDC(Pedi-IKDC)主观膝关节量表、膝关节损伤与骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS)以及前交叉韧带损伤后恢复运动(ACL-RSI)量表。通过线性混合效应模型比较体重标准化力量,并采用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较不同移植物类型之间的PROs。
在控制年龄、性别、术后时间和评估部位后,采用BPTB移植物的患者ACLR肢体的股四头肌力量比采用QT移植物的患者低10.8%(P = 0.05),比采用HT移植物的患者低20.4%(P < 0.001),而采用HT移植物的患者的股四头肌力量比采用QT移植物的患者高9.6%(P = 0.01)。采用BPTB移植物的患者的腘绳肌力量比采用QT移植物的患者高3.1%(P < 0.01),比采用HT移植物的患者高7.0%(P < 0.001)。采用HT移植物的患者的腘绳肌力量比采用QT移植物的患者低10.8%(P < 0.01)。采用QT移植物的患者的IKDC评分比采用HT移植物的患者低(-7.2%;P < 0.001),而KOOS运动评分比采用BPTB移植物的患者高(+4.5%;P < 0.001)。采用HT移植物的患者的IKDC评分比采用BPTB移植物的患者高(+5.4%;P < 0.001),KOOS运动评分也比采用BPTB移植物的患者高(+5.1%;P < 0.01)。ACL-RSI评分无差异(P = 0.37)。
在ACLR术后6至12个月,采用QT或BPTB移植物的患者的体重标准化股四头肌力量比采用HT移植物的患者差,但腘绳肌力量更大。PROs存在差异,ACL-RSI评分无差异,但采用HT移植物的患者自我报告的功能更好,参与运动的能力更强。