Li Man, Chen Jiamin, Zhang Liang, Chen Xiangmei, Zhou Jianfeng, Liu Feifei, Zhou Xingang, Xiao Jiang, Yang Kun, Qi Liming, Han Xiaoyi, Liu Ting, Zhao Hongxin, Zhou Zhen, Chen Xiaoyou, Sun Lei
Department of Pathology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Diagnostics, Beijing KingMed Center, Beijing, China.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Apr 29;15:1584189. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1584189. eCollection 2025.
Mycobacterial infections represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected individuals. This study evaluated diagnostic techniques for mycobacterial identification and compared clinicopathological features between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients.
We analyzed 88 tissue samples (with 41 matched blood and 28 sputum samples) using histopathology (HE and acid-fast staining), bacterial culture, MTB-PCR (sputum/biopsy), PCR-reverse dot blot hybridization (RDBH), and metagenomic pathogen detection technology (MetaPath™). Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors affecting detection rates.
Mycobacterial infection was detected in 95.5% (84/88) of patients. Among HIV-positive patients (n=63), 46% (29/63) had (MTB) infections, and 44% (28/63) had non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections, significantly higher than the 20% (5/25) NTM rate in HIV-negative patients. Univariate analysis identified HIV-positive status (=0.009), lymph node involvement (=0.020), and positive MetaPath™ results (=0.002) as significant predictors of detection, while multivariate analysis confirmed these as independent factors (=0.036; =0.042; =0.006). Lymph nodes were the most common infection site in HIV-positive patients (42.9%, 27/63), while lung tissue predominated in HIV-negative patients (48%, 12/25). MetaPath™ demonstrated superior sensitivity and specificity for detecting both MTB and NTM. Biopsy samples provided higher diagnostic accuracy than sputum or blood for lung and lymph node infections, but not for brain. In HIV-positive patients, NTM infections showed significantly more granuloma formation (=0.032) and foam cells (=0.005), but less necrosis (=0.0005) compared to MTB infections. No significant differences were observed in HIV-negative patients.
MetaPath™ is a highly effective diagnostic tool for mycobacterial infections, particularly in tissue biopsies. HIV-positive status, lymph node involvement, and MetaPath™ positivity independently predict mycobacterial detection. HIV-positive patients exhibit distinct clinicopathological features, emphasizing the need for tailored diagnostic and therapeutic approaches based on immune status.
分枝杆菌感染是艾滋病毒感染者发病和死亡的主要原因。本研究评估了分枝杆菌鉴定的诊断技术,并比较了艾滋病毒阳性和阴性患者的临床病理特征。
我们使用组织病理学(苏木精-伊红染色和抗酸染色)、细菌培养、结核分枝杆菌聚合酶链反应(痰液/活检)、聚合酶链反应-反向斑点杂交(RDBH)和宏基因组病原体检测技术(MetaPath™)分析了88份组织样本(以及41份匹配的血液样本和28份痰液样本)。进行逻辑回归分析以确定影响检出率的因素。
95.5%(84/88)的患者检测到分枝杆菌感染。在艾滋病毒阳性患者(n = 63)中,46%(29/63)患有结核分枝杆菌(MTB)感染,44%(28/63)患有非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)感染,显著高于艾滋病毒阴性患者中20%(5/25)的NTM感染率。单因素分析确定艾滋病毒阳性状态(P = 0.009)、淋巴结受累(P = 0.020)和MetaPath™结果阳性(P = 0.002)是检测的显著预测因素,而多因素分析证实这些是独立因素(P = 0.036;P = 0.042;P = 0.006)。淋巴结是艾滋病毒阳性患者最常见的感染部位(42.9%,27/63),而肺组织在艾滋病毒阴性患者中占主导(48%,12/25)。MetaPath™在检测MTB和NTM方面表现出更高的敏感性和特异性。对于肺和淋巴结感染,活检样本提供的诊断准确性高于痰液或血液,但对脑感染则不然。在艾滋病毒阳性患者中,与MTB感染相比,NTM感染显示出明显更多的肉芽肿形成(P = 0.032)和泡沫细胞(P = 0.005),但坏死较少(P = 0.0005)。在艾滋病毒阴性患者中未观察到显著差异。
MetaPath™是一种用于分枝杆菌感染的高效诊断工具,特别是在组织活检中。艾滋病毒阳性状态、淋巴结受累和MetaPath™阳性独立预测分枝杆菌检测。艾滋病毒阳性患者表现出独特的临床病理特征,强调需要根据免疫状态制定针对性的诊断和治疗方法。