• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型一次性刀与传统刀用于结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的疗效比较:一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验

Efficacy of a novel one-step knife compared to conventional knife for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Park Hong Jun, Kim Su Young, Baik Gwang Ho, Seo Myeongsook, Seo Hyun Il, Park Sung Chul, Kim Hyunil, Kim Hyun-Soo

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, 20 Ilsan-Ro, Wonju, 26426, Republic of Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 May 14;40(1):116. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04910-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-025-04910-0
PMID:40366393
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12078380/
Abstract

PURPOSE

For the treatment of advanced colorectal neoplasms, colon endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a crucial technique, although it is time-consuming. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a recently developed one-step knife (OSK) in colon ESD and compare its performance with that of a conventional knife (CK).

METHODS

Between July 2020 and November 2021, patients scheduled to undergo colorectal ESD were randomly assigned to either the OSK group or the CK group. The primary outcome was the total submucosal injection time. Additionally, total procedure time, treatment outcomes, adverse events, and operator convenience were analyzed.

RESULTS

Data from 53 patients (28 in the OSK group and 25 in the CK group) were analyzed. The mean total injection time was lower in the OSK group than in the CK group (186 s [IQR, 116.8-249.5] vs. 265 s [IQR, 130.5-553.0]), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.082). The total procedure time tended to be shorter in the OSK group than in the CK group (15.5 min [IQR, 11.3-22.8] vs. 20 min [IQR, 13.5-42.5], P = 0.110). Resection rates and adverse events did not differ between the two groups. A greater proportion of endoscopists expressed high satisfaction with the OSK, particularly regarding submucosal injection.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the CK, OSK use led to shorter injection and procedure times, though not statistically significant. The use of this newly developed endoscopic knife can potentially enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of colorectal ESD (Clinical Research Information Service: KCT0005123).

摘要

目的

对于晚期结直肠肿瘤的治疗,结肠内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)是一项关键技术,尽管耗时较长。本研究的目的是评估一种新开发的一步刀(OSK)在结肠ESD中的疗效,并将其性能与传统刀(CK)进行比较。

方法

在2020年7月至2021年11月期间,计划接受结直肠ESD的患者被随机分配到OSK组或CK组。主要结局是总的黏膜下注射时间。此外,还分析了总手术时间、治疗效果、不良事件和术者便利性。

结果

分析了53例患者的数据(OSK组28例,CK组25例)。OSK组的平均总注射时间低于CK组(186秒[四分位间距,116.8 - 249.5]对265秒[四分位间距,130.5 - 553.0]),但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.082)。OSK组的总手术时间倾向于比CK组短(15.5分钟[四分位间距,11.3 - 22.8]对20分钟[四分位间距,13.5 - 42.5],P = 0.110)。两组的切除率和不良事件无差异。更大比例的内镜医师对OSK表示高度满意,特别是在黏膜下注射方面。

结论

与CK相比,使用OSK可使注射和手术时间缩短,尽管无统计学意义。使用这种新开发的内镜刀可能会提高结直肠ESD的有效性和效率(临床研究信息服务:KCT0005123)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0011/12078380/51accdfcb5f6/384_2025_4910_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0011/12078380/a799dbccd077/384_2025_4910_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0011/12078380/6a1ac54e9808/384_2025_4910_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0011/12078380/51accdfcb5f6/384_2025_4910_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0011/12078380/a799dbccd077/384_2025_4910_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0011/12078380/6a1ac54e9808/384_2025_4910_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0011/12078380/51accdfcb5f6/384_2025_4910_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of a novel one-step knife compared to conventional knife for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.新型一次性刀与传统刀用于结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的疗效比较:一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 May 14;40(1):116. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04910-0.
2
Efficacy and safety of one-step knife compared to conventional insulated-tip knife for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a preliminary study with prospective data collection and retrospective review.与传统绝缘头刀相比,一步刀用于内镜黏膜下剥离术的有效性和安全性:一项收集前瞻性数据和进行回顾性分析的初步研究
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan;37(1):329-336. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09515-0. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
3
A Novel One-Step Knife Approach Can Reduce the Submucosal Injection Time of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Single-Blinded Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trials.一种新型一步式持刀方法可减少内镜黏膜下剥离术的黏膜下注射时间:一项单盲随机多中心临床试验。
Gut Liver. 2021 Jun 25;16(1):44-52. doi: 10.5009/gnl210103.
4
Scissor-type knife significantly improves self-completion rate of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Single-center prospective randomized trial.剪刀式刀具显著提高结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的自我完成率:单中心前瞻性随机试验。
Dig Endosc. 2017 May;29(3):322-329. doi: 10.1111/den.12784. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
5
Efficacy of traction-assisted colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using a clip-and-thread technique: A prospective randomized study.夹线辅助牵引式经内镜结肠直肠黏膜下剥离术的疗效:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Dig Endosc. 2018 Jul;30(4):467-476. doi: 10.1111/den.13036. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
6
Hybrid Versus Conventional Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (Short-Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection).混合式与传统结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术:一项多中心随机对照试验(短内镜黏膜下剥离术)
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 1;119(12):2436-2443. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002897. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
7
Comparison of the procedure time differences between hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasms: a study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial (Hybrid-G trial).比较早期胃癌患者行内镜黏膜下剥离术与杂交内镜黏膜下剥离术的手术时间差异:一项多中心随机对照试验研究方案(Hybrid-G 试验)
Trials. 2022 Feb 21;23(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06099-x.
8
Efficacy of an endo-knife with a water-jet function (Flushknife) for endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial colorectal neoplasms.水刀功能的内镜刀(Flushknife)在结直肠表面肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术中的疗效。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;105(2):314-22. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.547. Epub 2009 Sep 22.
9
Efficacy of Two Kinds of Scissor-Type Knives for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Retrospective Comparative Study.两种剪刀式刀在结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术中的疗效:一项回顾性对比研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Nov;69(11):4214-4223. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08525-3. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
10
An internal magnet traction device reduces procedure time for endoscopic submucosal dissection by expert and non-expert endoscopists: ex vivo study in a porcine colorectal model (with video).一种内部磁铁牵引装置可缩短内镜黏膜下剥离术的操作时间:在猪结直肠模型中的一项专家和非专家内镜医生的离体研究(附视频)。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2696-2703. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06817-8. Epub 2019 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Endoscopic En Bloc Versus Piecemeal Resection of Large Nonpedunculated Colonic Adenomas : A Randomized Comparative Trial.内镜整块切除与分片切除大型无蒂结直肠腺瘤的随机对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Jan;177(1):29-38. doi: 10.7326/M23-1812. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
2
Multicenter evaluation of recurrence in endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection in the colon: A Western perspective.结肠内镜黏膜下剥离术和内镜黏膜切除术复发情况的多中心评估:西方视角
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Jun 16;15(6):458-468. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i6.458.
3
Conventional versus hybrid knife endoscopic submucosal dissection in large colorectal laterally spreading tumors: A propensity score analysis.
传统与杂交刀内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗大肠侧向发育型肿瘤:倾向评分分析。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar-Apr;29(2):111-118. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_373_22.
4
Endoscopic submucosal dissection in colorectal neoplasia performed with a waterjet system-assisted knife: higher en-bloc resection rate than conventional technique.使用水刀系统辅助刀具进行的结直肠肿瘤内镜下黏膜下剥离术:整块切除率高于传统技术。
Clin Endosc. 2022 Nov;55(6):775-783. doi: 10.5946/ce.2022.099. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
5
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Colon and Rectum: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.内镜黏膜下剥离术在结肠和直肠中的应用:适应证、技术和结果。
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2023 Jan;33(1):83-97. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2022.08.001.
6
Efficacy of a Traction Device for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Using a Scissor-Type Knife: A Randomized Controlled Trial.一种剪刀型刀内镜黏膜下剥离术用牵引装置的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 1;117(11):1797-1804. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002019. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
7
Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜切除大肠大息肉后的复发率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 7;28(29):4007-4018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i29.4007.
8
Endoscopic submucosal dissection: How to be more efficient?内镜黏膜下剥离术:如何提高效率?
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Nov 12;9(11):E1720-E1730. doi: 10.1055/a-1554-3884. eCollection 2021 Nov.
9
A Novel One-Step Knife Approach Can Reduce the Submucosal Injection Time of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Single-Blinded Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trials.一种新型一步式持刀方法可减少内镜黏膜下剥离术的黏膜下注射时间:一项单盲随机多中心临床试验。
Gut Liver. 2021 Jun 25;16(1):44-52. doi: 10.5009/gnl210103.
10
Snare Tip Is an Alternative Tool for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.圈套尖端是结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的另一种工具。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Feb 1;64(2):241-247. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001786.