Suppr超能文献

神经肿瘤学临床实践的质量评估

Quality assessment of clinical practice in neuro-oncology.

作者信息

Miranda Renata Carolina Acri Nunes, Malheiros Suzana Maria Fleury, Gentil André Felix, Silva Gisele Sampaio, Hirata Fabiana de Campos Cordeiro, Araujo Sérgio Eduardo Alonso, Caboclo Luís Otávio Sales

机构信息

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2025 May 12;23:eAO1343. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO1343. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In this study, we aimed to improve patient care for central nervous system conditions based on the 2021 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. Performance measures were used to enhance team accountability and address challenges due to limited evaluate to health insurance and variations in clinical staff decision-making. Rehabilitation and observed variability in surgical costs were not measured in this study. Similar studies were also referenced, and improvements in real-time glioma management were suggested. Performance measures and standardizing practices were recommended to improve cost predictability despite the observed cost variability caused by individualized care. ■ The molecular test according to the WHO classification of CNS tumors (gliomas) was performed in 100% (172) of patients. ■ Education on chemotherapy and informed consent for patients with brain tumors was carried out for 100% (130) of the patients who had an indication for chemotherapy treatment. ■ Approximately 87% of the patients with gliomas underwent postoperative cranial MRI. ■ A multidisciplinary approach, including molecular testing, was used for 35% of patients with glioma. ■ Thromboembolic events after resection of the primary brain tumor occurred in only 0.84% (3) patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality indicators proposed by the American Academy of Neurology and Neuro-oncology Society in patients with primary intracranial central nervous system tumors.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective level I analysis that used electronic medical records from the CERNER system and GDOC-SAME at the tertiary hospital. It was approved by the Research Ethics Committee and followed the Declaration of Helsinki. Data was collected and analyzed confidentially via REDCap. The research focused on patients 18 or older with primary central nervous system tumors who had surgery from August 2015 to August 2021. It excluded surgeries performed elsewhere, reoperations, secondary (metastatic) tumors, and primary central nervous system tumors outside the cranium.

RESULTS

The results showed that 48% of the patients had gliomas, whereas 30 and 21.6% had meningiomas and other types of tumors. Quality measures showed that 35% of the patients with grade 2-4 tumors had multidisciplinary care plan discussions. All patients with gliomas underwent molecular testing and those eligible who underwent chemotherapy were educated and provided informed consent. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging within 72h was performed in 87% of gliomas. The length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status at discharge, and 30-day status were also potential quality measures. However, for meningioma cases, readmissions were associated with patients in the American Society of Anesthesiologists II (58.33%) and American Society of Anesthesiologists III-IV (41.67%).

CONCLUSION

The study conclusions revealed that adherence to quality indicators was good; however, improvements are needed in multidisciplinary care plans and postoperative imaging. Quality measures can be enhanced by controlling factors such as American Society of Anesthesiologists and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scales at admission, epileptic seizure occurrence, neurological deficits, and tumor size in meningiomas. The study's findings highlighted the importance of quality improvement programs for optimal medical care.

摘要

背景

在本研究中,我们旨在根据2021年英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所指南改善中枢神经系统疾病的患者护理。使用绩效指标来加强团队问责制,并应对由于医疗保险评估有限和临床工作人员决策差异所带来的挑战。本研究未对康复情况及手术费用的观察性变异性进行测量。还参考了类似研究,并提出了实时胶质瘤管理方面的改进建议。尽管个性化护理会导致观察到成本变异性,但仍建议采用绩效指标和标准化做法来提高成本可预测性。

  • 100%(172例)患者进行了根据世界卫生组织中枢神经系统肿瘤(胶质瘤)分类的分子检测。

  • 100%(130例)有化疗指征的脑肿瘤患者接受了化疗教育并签署了知情同意书。

  • 约87%的胶质瘤患者接受了术后头颅磁共振成像检查。

  • 35%的胶质瘤患者采用了包括分子检测在内的多学科方法。

  • 原发性脑肿瘤切除术后血栓栓塞事件仅发生在0.84%(3例)患者中。

目的

评估美国神经病学学会和神经肿瘤学会针对原发性颅内中枢神经系统肿瘤患者提出的质量指标。

方法

本研究是一项回顾性I级分析,使用了三级医院CERNER系统和GDOC-SAME中的电子病历。该研究经研究伦理委员会批准,并遵循《赫尔辛基宣言》。通过REDCap对数据进行保密收集和分析。该研究聚焦于2015年8月至2021年8月期间接受手术的18岁及以上原发性中枢神经系统肿瘤患者。排除在其他地方进行的手术、再次手术、继发性(转移性)肿瘤以及颅外原发性中枢神经系统肿瘤。

结果

结果显示,48%的患者患有胶质瘤,而30%和21.6%的患者患有脑膜瘤和其他类型的肿瘤。质量指标显示,35%的2-4级肿瘤患者进行了多学科护理计划讨论。所有胶质瘤患者均接受了分子检测,符合化疗条件的患者接受了教育并签署了知情同意书。87%的胶质瘤患者在72小时内进行了术后磁共振成像检查。住院时间长短、术后并发症、出院时东部肿瘤协作组状态以及30天状态也是潜在的质量指标。然而,对于脑膜瘤病例,再次入院与美国麻醉医师协会II级(58.33%)和美国麻醉医师协会III-IV级(41.67%)的患者有关。

结论

研究结论表明,对质量指标的遵守情况良好;然而,多学科护理计划和术后成像方面仍需改进。通过控制诸如入院时美国麻醉医师协会和东部肿瘤协作组量表、癫痫发作发生情况、神经功能缺损以及脑膜瘤的肿瘤大小等因素,可以提高质量指标。该研究结果凸显了质量改进计划对于优化医疗护理的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fea7/12094678/3914cf847b49/2317-6385-eins-23-eAO1343-gf01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验