• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经肿瘤学临床实践的质量评估

Quality assessment of clinical practice in neuro-oncology.

作者信息

Miranda Renata Carolina Acri Nunes, Malheiros Suzana Maria Fleury, Gentil André Felix, Silva Gisele Sampaio, Hirata Fabiana de Campos Cordeiro, Araujo Sérgio Eduardo Alonso, Caboclo Luís Otávio Sales

机构信息

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2025 May 12;23:eAO1343. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO1343. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO1343
PMID:40367009
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12094678/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In this study, we aimed to improve patient care for central nervous system conditions based on the 2021 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. Performance measures were used to enhance team accountability and address challenges due to limited evaluate to health insurance and variations in clinical staff decision-making. Rehabilitation and observed variability in surgical costs were not measured in this study. Similar studies were also referenced, and improvements in real-time glioma management were suggested. Performance measures and standardizing practices were recommended to improve cost predictability despite the observed cost variability caused by individualized care. ■ The molecular test according to the WHO classification of CNS tumors (gliomas) was performed in 100% (172) of patients. ■ Education on chemotherapy and informed consent for patients with brain tumors was carried out for 100% (130) of the patients who had an indication for chemotherapy treatment. ■ Approximately 87% of the patients with gliomas underwent postoperative cranial MRI. ■ A multidisciplinary approach, including molecular testing, was used for 35% of patients with glioma. ■ Thromboembolic events after resection of the primary brain tumor occurred in only 0.84% (3) patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality indicators proposed by the American Academy of Neurology and Neuro-oncology Society in patients with primary intracranial central nervous system tumors.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective level I analysis that used electronic medical records from the CERNER system and GDOC-SAME at the tertiary hospital. It was approved by the Research Ethics Committee and followed the Declaration of Helsinki. Data was collected and analyzed confidentially via REDCap. The research focused on patients 18 or older with primary central nervous system tumors who had surgery from August 2015 to August 2021. It excluded surgeries performed elsewhere, reoperations, secondary (metastatic) tumors, and primary central nervous system tumors outside the cranium.

RESULTS

The results showed that 48% of the patients had gliomas, whereas 30 and 21.6% had meningiomas and other types of tumors. Quality measures showed that 35% of the patients with grade 2-4 tumors had multidisciplinary care plan discussions. All patients with gliomas underwent molecular testing and those eligible who underwent chemotherapy were educated and provided informed consent. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging within 72h was performed in 87% of gliomas. The length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status at discharge, and 30-day status were also potential quality measures. However, for meningioma cases, readmissions were associated with patients in the American Society of Anesthesiologists II (58.33%) and American Society of Anesthesiologists III-IV (41.67%).

CONCLUSION

The study conclusions revealed that adherence to quality indicators was good; however, improvements are needed in multidisciplinary care plans and postoperative imaging. Quality measures can be enhanced by controlling factors such as American Society of Anesthesiologists and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scales at admission, epileptic seizure occurrence, neurological deficits, and tumor size in meningiomas. The study's findings highlighted the importance of quality improvement programs for optimal medical care.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fea7/12094678/0721741b0909/2317-6385-eins-23-eAO1343-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fea7/12094678/3914cf847b49/2317-6385-eins-23-eAO1343-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fea7/12094678/17d38e43ef6e/2317-6385-eins-23-eAO1343-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fea7/12094678/0721741b0909/2317-6385-eins-23-eAO1343-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fea7/12094678/3914cf847b49/2317-6385-eins-23-eAO1343-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fea7/12094678/17d38e43ef6e/2317-6385-eins-23-eAO1343-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fea7/12094678/0721741b0909/2317-6385-eins-23-eAO1343-gf03.jpg
摘要

背景

在本研究中,我们旨在根据2021年英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所指南改善中枢神经系统疾病的患者护理。使用绩效指标来加强团队问责制,并应对由于医疗保险评估有限和临床工作人员决策差异所带来的挑战。本研究未对康复情况及手术费用的观察性变异性进行测量。还参考了类似研究,并提出了实时胶质瘤管理方面的改进建议。尽管个性化护理会导致观察到成本变异性,但仍建议采用绩效指标和标准化做法来提高成本可预测性。

  • 100%(172例)患者进行了根据世界卫生组织中枢神经系统肿瘤(胶质瘤)分类的分子检测。

  • 100%(130例)有化疗指征的脑肿瘤患者接受了化疗教育并签署了知情同意书。

  • 约87%的胶质瘤患者接受了术后头颅磁共振成像检查。

  • 35%的胶质瘤患者采用了包括分子检测在内的多学科方法。

  • 原发性脑肿瘤切除术后血栓栓塞事件仅发生在0.84%(3例)患者中。

目的

评估美国神经病学学会和神经肿瘤学会针对原发性颅内中枢神经系统肿瘤患者提出的质量指标。

方法

本研究是一项回顾性I级分析,使用了三级医院CERNER系统和GDOC-SAME中的电子病历。该研究经研究伦理委员会批准,并遵循《赫尔辛基宣言》。通过REDCap对数据进行保密收集和分析。该研究聚焦于2015年8月至2021年8月期间接受手术的18岁及以上原发性中枢神经系统肿瘤患者。排除在其他地方进行的手术、再次手术、继发性(转移性)肿瘤以及颅外原发性中枢神经系统肿瘤。

结果

结果显示,48%的患者患有胶质瘤,而30%和21.6%的患者患有脑膜瘤和其他类型的肿瘤。质量指标显示,35%的2-4级肿瘤患者进行了多学科护理计划讨论。所有胶质瘤患者均接受了分子检测,符合化疗条件的患者接受了教育并签署了知情同意书。87%的胶质瘤患者在72小时内进行了术后磁共振成像检查。住院时间长短、术后并发症、出院时东部肿瘤协作组状态以及30天状态也是潜在的质量指标。然而,对于脑膜瘤病例,再次入院与美国麻醉医师协会II级(58.33%)和美国麻醉医师协会III-IV级(41.67%)的患者有关。

结论

研究结论表明,对质量指标的遵守情况良好;然而,多学科护理计划和术后成像方面仍需改进。通过控制诸如入院时美国麻醉医师协会和东部肿瘤协作组量表、癫痫发作发生情况、神经功能缺损以及脑膜瘤的肿瘤大小等因素,可以提高质量指标。该研究结果凸显了质量改进计划对于优化医疗护理的重要性。

相似文献

1
Quality assessment of clinical practice in neuro-oncology.神经肿瘤学临床实践的质量评估
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2025 May 12;23:eAO1343. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO1343. eCollection 2025.
2
Foundations of Neuro-Oncology: A Multidisciplinary Approach.神经肿瘤学基础:多学科方法。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jul;151:392-401. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.059. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
3
A retrospective survey of patients with malignant gliomas treated in the neuro-oncological care system under the Universal National Health Insurance program in Taiwan.台湾全民健康保险制度下神经肿瘤照护体系中恶性神经胶质瘤患者的回顾性调查。
J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Jun;18(6):784-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.10.016. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
4
Central nervous system pediatric multi-disciplinary tumor board: a single center experience.中枢神经系统儿科多学科肿瘤委员会:单中心经验。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 13;24(1):1146. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12882-7.
5
Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation.首次就诊时磁共振灌注成像用于鉴别低级别与高级别胶质瘤
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD011551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011551.pub2.
6
Central Nervous System Cancers, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.中枢神经系统癌症,第 3.2020 版,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Nov 2;18(11):1537-1570. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0052.
7
The prognostic value of clinical factors and cancer stem cell-related markers in gliomas.临床因素和癌症干细胞相关标志物在胶质瘤中的预后价值。
Dan Med J. 2014 Oct;61(10):B4944.
8
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
9
Multidisciplinary management of adult low grade gliomas.成人低级别胶质瘤的多学科管理
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2014 Sep-Oct;109(5):590-9.
10
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on treatment patterns in glioblastoma.新冠疫情对胶质母细胞瘤治疗模式的影响。
Neuro Oncol. 2024 Mar 4;26(3):581-583. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noad234.
2
RANO 2.0: Update to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Criteria for High- and Low-Grade Gliomas in Adults. RANO 2.0:成人高级别和低级别胶质瘤反应评估标准更新。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov 20;41(33):5187-5199. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01059. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
3
Quality indicators in neuro-oncology: Review of the literature and development of a new quality indicator set for glioma care through a two-round Delphi survey.
神经肿瘤学中的质量指标:通过两轮 Delphi 调查,对文献进行回顾,并制定新的用于胶质瘤治疗的质量指标集。
J Neurooncol. 2022 Apr;157(2):365-376. doi: 10.1007/s11060-022-03971-3. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
4
The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.2021 年世卫组织中枢神经系统肿瘤分类:概述。
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1231-1251. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106.
5
CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2013-2017.美国 2013-2017 年诊断的原发性脑和其他中枢神经系统肿瘤 CBTRUS 统计报告。
Neuro Oncol. 2020 Oct 30;22(12 Suppl 2):iv1-iv96. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa200.
6
Genesis of Quality Measurements to Improve the Care Delivered to Patients With Brain Metastases.质量测量方法的起源,旨在改善脑转移患者的护理。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Mar;17(3):e397-e405. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00233. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
7
Developing consensus among movement disorder specialists on clinical indicators for identification and management of advanced Parkinson's disease: a multi-country Delphi-panel approach.在运动障碍专家中就识别和管理晚期帕金森病的临床指标达成共识:一项多国德尔菲小组方法。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Dec;34(12):2063-2073. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1502165. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
8
An Evaluation of the Use of Performance Measures in Health Care.医疗保健中绩效指标使用情况的评估。
Rand Health Q. 2012 Dec 1;1(4):3. eCollection 2012 Winter.
9
The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.2016 年世界卫生组织中枢神经系统肿瘤分类:概述。
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803-20. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1. Epub 2016 May 9.
10
Quality improvement in neurology: Multiple sclerosis quality measures: Executive summary.神经病学质量改进:多发性硬化症质量指标:执行摘要。
Neurology. 2015 Nov 24;85(21):1904-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001965. Epub 2015 Sep 2.