• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对150例淋巴水肿患者进行24个月随访,分析淋巴管静脉吻合术在降低蜂窝织炎复发方面的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of lymphaticovenous anastomosis in reducing cellulitis recurrence in 150 lymphoedema cases followed-up over 24 months.

作者信息

Humphreys I, Thomas M, Pike C, Morgan K, Jessop Z, Bragg T, Ghattaura A

机构信息

School of Health and Social Care, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.

Lymphoedema Wales Clinical Network, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Port Talbot, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2025 Jul;106:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.04.032. Epub 2025 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2025.04.032
PMID:40367651
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lymphoedema is a chronic condition that imposes ongoing costs on the patient and National Health Service (NHS). This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) in reducing cellulitis recurrence in 150 patients with lymphoedema who were followed-up for over 24 months.

METHODS

Data were prospectively captured pre- and post-LVA surgery in 150 patients with unilateral lower or upper limb lymphoedema in a centre in the UK. Data collection included cellulitis resource utilisation with costs identified from the British National Formulary, Personal Social Services Research Unit, and a quality-of-life questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L).

RESULTS

The mean overall costs for cellulitis and hospital admissions reduced by £1389.85, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Mean per patient reduction of costs across the 24-months was estimated at -£1405.62 (CI: -£1878.09, -£933.16). When the cost of LVA (£4551) was included, the reductions were offset to £3145.37 (CI: £2672.90, £3617.84). The mean EQ-5D-5L utility score (n = 143) increased from 0.743 (SD 0.168) to 0.800 (SD 0.196), being statistically significant (p = <0.001). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) through costs and EQ-5D-5L changes was £54231, indicating that LVA costs more, but is more effective. LVA benefits patients for more than the 24-months captured, thus costs would be reduced based on the patients' life expectancy.

CONCLUSION

This cost-effectiveness analysis provided an in-depth examination of a large cohort of LVA patients who were followed up for 24 months, highlighting decreased cellulitis recurrence.

摘要

背景

淋巴水肿是一种慢性病,给患者和国民医疗服务体系(NHS)带来持续的费用负担。本研究旨在评估在150例接受了超过24个月随访的淋巴水肿患者中,淋巴管静脉吻合术(LVA)在降低蜂窝织炎复发方面的成本效益。

方法

在英国一个中心,前瞻性收集了150例单侧下肢或上肢淋巴水肿患者LVA手术前后的数据。数据收集包括蜂窝织炎资源利用情况,成本从《英国国家处方集》、个人社会服务研究单位以及一份生活质量问卷(EQ-5D-5L)中确定。

结果

蜂窝织炎和住院的平均总成本降低了1389.85英镑,具有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。估计24个月内每位患者的平均成本降低为-1405.62英镑(CI:-1878.09,-933.16)。当纳入LVA的成本(4551英镑)时,成本降低额被抵消至3145.37英镑(CI:2672.90,3617.84)。平均EQ-5D-5L效用评分(n = 143)从0.743(标准差0.168)提高到0.800(标准差0.196),具有统计学意义(p = <0.001)。通过成本和EQ-5D-5L变化得出的增量成本效益比(ICER)为54231英镑,表明LVA成本更高,但更有效。LVA对患者的益处超过了所记录的24个月,因此基于患者的预期寿命,成本将会降低。

结论

这项成本效益分析对一大群接受了24个月随访期的LVA患者进行了深入研究,突出了蜂窝织炎复发率的降低。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of lymphaticovenous anastomosis in reducing cellulitis recurrence in 150 lymphoedema cases followed-up over 24 months.对150例淋巴水肿患者进行24个月随访,分析淋巴管静脉吻合术在降低蜂窝织炎复发方面的成本效益。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2025 Jul;106:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.04.032. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
2
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
5
Evaluation of the ventricular assist device programme in the UK.英国心室辅助装置项目评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(48):1-119, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10480.
6
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
7
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
8
A review of the evidence on the effects and costs of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in different patient groups, and modelling of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility for these groups in a UK context.对不同患者群体中植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的效果和成本相关证据的综述,以及在英国背景下对这些群体的成本效益和成本效用进行建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(27):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-164. doi: 10.3310/hta10270.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
10
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.