Liu Fangjun, Zhang Zhengxin, Sun Wenjie, Li Tao
Public health School, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Public health School, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Nutr Res. 2025 Jun;138:135-150. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2025.04.008. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
This meta-analysis aimed to determine the short- (< 3 months) and long-term (≥ 3 months) metabolic effects of IF in patients with type 2 diabetes. We hypothesized that IF is non-inferior to other dietary control methods (including continuous energy restriction, standard diet, Mediterranean diet and ad libitum diet) in terms of both short-term and long-term metabolic impacts in patients with type 2 diabetes. We searched for studies in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library until August 20, 2023. Studies with non-type 2 diabetes patients, interventions other than IF, no control group, or non-randomized clinical trial designs were excluded. A meta-analysis was then conducted with a random effects model. The Risk of Bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB 2). 12 articles with a total of 966 participants were included. IF significantly decreased glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.64, -0.22; P = 0.01), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (SMD: -0.73; 95% CI: -0.92, -0.54; P < 0.00001) and body weight (SMD: -1.11; 95% CI: -1.92, -0.31; P = 0.007) in the short term compared to control interventions, but showed a similar effect to control interventions in the long term. Substantial heterogeneity existed among our studies. Over the intervention period, long-term IF may safely and feasibly help patients with type 2 diabetes effectively manage blood sugar and reduce body weight, but the metabolic benefits of IF don't endure after its discontinuation. Therefore, continual long-term IF may provide more lasting metabolic benefits.
这项荟萃分析旨在确定间歇性禁食(IF)对2型糖尿病患者的短期(<3个月)和长期(≥3个月)代谢影响。我们假设,在2型糖尿病患者的短期和长期代谢影响方面,IF不劣于其他饮食控制方法(包括持续能量限制、标准饮食、地中海饮食和自由进食饮食)。我们在MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆中检索了截至2023年8月20日的研究。排除了非2型糖尿病患者的研究、IF以外的干预措施、无对照组或非随机临床试验设计的研究。然后采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(ROB 2)评估偏倚风险。纳入了12篇文章,共966名参与者。与对照干预相比,IF在短期内显著降低了糖化血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)(标准化平均差[SMD]:-0.93;95%置信区间[CI]:-1.64,-0.22;P = 0.01)、空腹血糖(FPG)(SMD:-0.73;95%CI:-0.92,-0.54;P < 0.00001)和体重(SMD:-1.11;95%CI:-1.92,-0.31;P = 0.007),但在长期内与对照干预效果相似。我们的研究之间存在很大的异质性。在干预期内,长期IF可能安全可行地帮助2型糖尿病患者有效控制血糖和减轻体重,但IF停止后其代谢益处不能持久。因此,持续长期的IF可能会带来更持久的代谢益处。