Suppr超能文献

经皮单通道内镜减压联合双通道内镜腰椎椎间融合术与微创象限经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗单节段腰椎管狭窄症的比较

Percutaneous Uniportal Endoscopic Decompression Combined with Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Quadrant Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

作者信息

Ma Ming-Ling, Ma Zi-Jian, Wang Bin-Yu, Cai Jun

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, China; Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Teaching Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Yangzhou, China.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2025 Jul;199:124070. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124070. Epub 2025 May 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes between group A (hybrid endoscopic technique: percutaneous uniportal endoscopic decompression combined with biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion [LIF]) and group B (minimally invasive Quadrant transforaminal LIF) for lumbar spinal stenosis.

METHODS

This study included 68 consecutive patients (group A: 32 patients; group B: 36 patients) retrospectively enrolled and treated between June 2019 and June 2021. Perioperative data were prospectively collected, including radiological outcomes (intervertebral disc height, sagittal Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis) and clinical outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale [VAS], and Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]). Paravertebral muscle injury was assessed by serum creatine phosphokinase levels. Additionally, fusion rate and perioperative complication rates were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

At 1 month postoperatively, group A demonstrated significantly better outcomes in VAS-Back, VAS-Leg, and SF-36 scores compared to group B (P < 0.05). At 3 months postoperatively, group A demonstrated significantly better outcomes in VAS-Back, Oswestry Disability Index, and SF-36 scores compared to group B (P < 0.05). Creatine phosphokinase levels in group A were significantly lower than those in group B at 1, 3, and 7 days postoperatively (P < 0.05). However, no significant intergroup differences were observed in intervertebral disc height, sagittal Cobb angle, and lumbar lordosis at 1 and 12 months postoperatively (P > 0.1). Additionally, fusion rates and surgical complication rates did not differ significantly between groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The hybrid endoscopic technique (percutaneous uniportal endoscopic decompression combined with biportal endoscopic LIF) demonstrates comparable clinical outcomes and fusion rates to minimally invasive Quadrant transforaminal LIF for lumbar spinal stenosis, while achieving reduced postoperative pain and improved early functional recovery.

摘要

目的

比较A组(混合内镜技术:经皮单通道内镜减压联合双通道内镜腰椎椎间融合术[LIF])和B组(微创Quadrant经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术)治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效。

方法

本研究回顾性纳入了2019年6月至2021年6月期间连续治疗的68例患者(A组:32例患者;B组:36例患者)。前瞻性收集围手术期数据,包括影像学结果(椎间盘高度、矢状面Cobb角、腰椎前凸)和临床结果(Oswestry功能障碍指数、视觉模拟量表[VAS]和简短健康调查简表[SF-36])。通过血清肌酸磷酸激酶水平评估椎旁肌损伤情况。此外,比较两组之间的融合率和围手术期并发症发生率。

结果

术后1个月,A组在VAS背部、VAS腿部和SF-36评分方面的结果明显优于B组(P<0.05)。术后3个月,A组在VAS背部、Oswestry功能障碍指数和SF-36评分方面的结果明显优于B组(P<0.05)。术后1、3和7天,A组的肌酸磷酸激酶水平明显低于B组(P<0.05)。然而,术后1个月和12个月时,两组在椎间盘高度、矢状面Cobb角和腰椎前凸方面未观察到显著的组间差异(P>0.1)。此外,两组之间的融合率和手术并发症发生率无显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

混合内镜技术(经皮单通道内镜减压联合双通道内镜腰椎椎间融合术)治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效和融合率与微创Quadrant经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术相当,同时可减轻术后疼痛并改善早期功能恢复。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验