• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[单侧双门内镜辅助下减压治疗腰椎侧隐窝狭窄的策略]

[Unilateral biportal endoscopy-assisted decompression strategy for lateral lumbar spinal stenosis].

作者信息

Xu Xuyang, Zhang Zhiqiang, Wang Zijie, Zhang Liang, Cai Jun, Feng Xinmin, Ding Yu, Zhang Yi

机构信息

Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou Jiangsu, 225001, P. R. China.

Department of Orthopedics, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou Jiangsu, 225001, P. R. China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 May 15;39(5):612-619. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202502068.

DOI:10.7507/1002-1892.202502068
PMID:40368865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12091711/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore decompression strategies for lateral lumbar spinal stenosis under unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) assistance.

METHODS

A clinical data of 86 patients with lateral lumbar stenosis treated with UBE-assisted intervertebral decompression between September 2022 and December 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 42 males and 44 females with an average age of 63.6 years (range, 45-79 years). The disease duration ranged from 6 to 14 months (mean, 8.5 months). Surgical levels included L in 3 cases, L in 26 cases, L in 42 cases, and L , S in 15 cases. According to Lee's grading system, there were 21 cases of grade 1, 37 cases of grade 2, and 28 cases of grade 3 for lumbar spinal stenosis. Based on the location of stenosis and clinical symptoms, the 33 cases underwent interlaminar approach, 7 cases underwent interlaminar approach with auxiliary third incision, 26 cases underwent contralateral inclinatory approach, and 20 cases underwent paraspinal approach; then, the corresponding decompression procedures were performed. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate lower back/leg pain before operation and at 1 and 3 months after operation, while Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to evaluate spinal function. At 3 months after operation, the effectiveness was evaluated using the modified MacNab evaluation criteria. The spinal stenosis and decompression were evaluated based on Lee's grading system using lumbar MRI before operation and at 3 months after operation.

RESULTS

All procedures were successfully completed with mean operation time of 95.1 minutes (range, 57-166 minutes). Dural tears occurred in 2 cases treated with interlaminar approach with auxiliary third incision. All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 3-10 months (mean, 5.9 months). The clinical symptoms of the patients relieved to varying degrees. The VAS scores and ODI of lower back and leg pain at 1 and 3 months after operation significantly improved compared to preoperative levels ( <0.05), and the indicators at 3 months significantly improved than that at 1 month ( <0.05). According to the modified MacNab evaluation criteria, the effectiveness at 3 months after operation was rated as excellent in 52 cases, good in 21 cases, and poor in 13 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 84.9%. No lumbar instability was detected on flexion-extension X-ray films during follow-up. The Lee's grading of lateral lumbar stenosis at 2 days after operation showed significant improvement compared to preoperative grading ( <0.05).

CONCLUSION

For lateral lumbar spinal stenosis, UBE-assisted decompression of the spinal canal requires the selection of interlaminar approach, interlaminar approach with auxiliary third incision, contralateral inclinatory approach, and paraspinal approach based on preoperative imaging findings and clinical symptoms to achieve better effectiveness.

摘要

目的

探讨单侧双通道内镜(UBE)辅助下腰椎侧隐窝狭窄的减压策略。

方法

回顾性分析2022年9月至2023年12月期间接受UBE辅助椎间减压治疗的86例腰椎侧隐窝狭窄患者的临床资料。其中男性42例,女性44例,平均年龄63.6岁(范围45 - 79岁)。病程6至14个月(平均8.5个月)。手术节段包括L₃ 3例,L₄ 26例,L₅ 42例,L₅、S₁ 15例。根据Lee分级系统,腰椎管狭窄症1级21例,2级37例,3级28例。根据狭窄部位及临床症状,33例行椎板间入路,7例行椎板间入路辅助第三切口,26例行对侧倾斜入路,20例行椎旁入路;然后进行相应的减压手术。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估术前及术后1个月和3个月的腰/腿痛情况,采用Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评估脊柱功能。术后3个月,采用改良MacNab评估标准评估疗效。术前及术后3个月采用腰椎MRI基于Lee分级系统评估腰椎管狭窄及减压情况。

结果

所有手术均顺利完成,平均手术时间95.1分钟(范围57 - 166分钟)。椎板间入路辅助第三切口治疗的2例患者发生硬膜撕裂。所有切口均一期愈合。所有患者随访3 - 10个月(平均5.9个月)。患者临床症状均有不同程度缓解。术后1个月和3个月腰腿痛的VAS评分及ODI较术前显著改善(P < 0.05),且3个月时指标较1个月时显著改善(P < 0.05)。根据改良MacNab评估标准,术后3个月疗效评定为优52例,良21例,差13例,优良率为84.9%。随访期间屈伸位X线片未发现腰椎不稳。术后2天腰椎侧隐窝狭窄的Lee分级较术前分级有显著改善(P < 0.05)。

结论

对于腰椎侧隐窝狭窄,UBE辅助椎管减压需根据术前影像学表现及临床症状选择椎板间入路、椎板间入路辅助第三切口、对侧倾斜入路及椎旁入路,以取得更好疗效。

相似文献

1
[Unilateral biportal endoscopy-assisted decompression strategy for lateral lumbar spinal stenosis].[单侧双门内镜辅助下减压治疗腰椎侧隐窝狭窄的策略]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 May 15;39(5):612-619. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202502068.
2
[Short-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy technique in treatment of lumbar lateral saphenous fossa combined with intervertebral foramina stenosis via contralateral sublaminar approach].[单侧双通道内镜技术经对侧椎板下入路治疗腰椎外侧隐窝合并椎间孔狭窄的短期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Jul 15;38(7):874-879. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202404009.
3
[Early-effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopic laminectomy in treatment of two-level lumbar spinal stenosis].[单侧双通道内镜下椎板切除术治疗双节段腰椎管狭窄症的早期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jun 15;37(6):706-712. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202302014.
4
[Comparison of effectiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic and uniportal interlaminar endoscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis].单侧双通道内镜与单通道椎间孔内镜减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 15;38(3):324-330. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202312029.
5
[Efficacy comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression and extended interlaminar fenestration for lumbar lateral recess stenosis].[单侧双通道内镜减压与扩大椎板间开窗治疗腰椎侧隐窝狭窄症的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Mar 22;102(11):801-807. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210929-02192.
6
[Early effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy technique for migrated lumbar intervertebral disc herniation].[单侧双通道内镜技术治疗移位型腰椎间盘突出症的早期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Nov 15;38(11):1367-1371. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202408026.
7
[Treatment of senile lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral approach and bilateral decompression with large channel endoscopy].[单通道内镜下单侧入路双侧减压治疗老年腰椎管狭窄症]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2021 Jan 25;34(1):8-14. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.01.003.
8
[Unilateral interlaminar approach 270° circular spinal canal decompression under the iLESSYS Delta for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly].[在iLESSYS Delta下采用单侧椎板间入路270°环形椎管减压术治疗老年腰椎管狭窄症]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2023 Nov 25;36(11):1070-4. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.11.012.
9
[Effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy technique combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in treatment of lumbar burst fractures].单侧双通道内镜技术联合经皮椎弓根螺钉固定治疗腰椎爆裂骨折的疗效
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Nov 15;38(11):1372-1378. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202406050.
10
Bilateral synchronous UBE for unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression as a potentially effective minimally Invasive approach for two-level lumbar spinal stenosis.双侧同步UBE治疗单侧椎板切开术及双侧减压作为治疗二级腰椎管狭窄症的一种潜在有效的微创方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):2461. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86106-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Open laminectomy vs. minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a review.开放性椎板切除术与微创椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的综述
Front Surg. 2024 Nov 7;11:1357897. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1357897. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal and percutaneous endoscopic techniques in unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) for lumbar spinal stenosis.单侧双通道内镜与经皮内镜技术单侧入路双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Sep 5;25(1):713. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07825-z.
3
Comparison of biportal endoscopic and microscopic tubular paraspinal approach for foraminal and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation.经皮内窥镜下单侧入路与显微镜下单侧入路治疗椎间孔型及极外侧型腰椎间盘突出症的比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 Jul 19;41(4):473-482. doi: 10.3171/2024.4.SPINE23707. Print 2024 Oct 1.
4
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Lumbar Disc Herniation.单侧双通道内镜治疗腰椎管狭窄症和腰椎间盘突出症
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023 Jun 27;13(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00020. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
5
Finite element mechanical analysis of ipsilateral approach and contralateral approach in unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgery.单侧全内镜脊柱手术中同侧入路和对侧入路的有限元力学分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Dec 20;18(1):979. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04476-z.
6
Comparison of the results of open PLIF versus UBE PLIF in lumbar spinal stenosis: postoperative adjacent segment instability is lesser in UBE.比较开放 PLIF 和 UBE PLIF 治疗腰椎管狭窄症的结果:UBE 术后邻近节段不稳定程度较低。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jul 29;18(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04038-3.
7
Contralateral inclinatory approach for decompression of the lateral recess and same-level foraminal lesions using unilateral biportal endoscopy: A technical report.使用单侧双门内镜经对侧倾斜入路治疗侧隐窝及同节段椎间孔病变减压:技术报告
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 31;9:959390. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.959390. eCollection 2022.
8
How I do it: biportal endoscopic paraspinal approach for recurrent lumbar disc herniation following percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.我是这样做的:经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症后采用双通道内窥镜脊柱旁入路。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Nov;164(11):3057-3060. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05368-7. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
9
Diagnosis and Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Review.腰椎管狭窄症的诊断与治疗:综述
JAMA. 2022 May 3;327(17):1688-1699. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.5921.
10
A Helpful Third Portal for Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Technical Note.一种有助于脊髓型颈椎病患者进行单侧双孔道内镜减压的第三入路:技术说明
World Neurosurg. 2022 May;161:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.021. Epub 2022 Feb 10.