Suppr超能文献

不同垂直距离口腔矫治器治疗患者的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征指标:一项初步研究。

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome indexes in patients treated with oral appliances with different vertical dimension: a preliminary study.

作者信息

Levrini Luca, Kozokic Jovana, Giannotta Nicola, Bernardini Elena F, Deppieri Alessandro, Sparaco Maria, Mastrapasqua Rodolfo F, Saran Stefano

机构信息

Department of Human Sciences, Innovation and Territory, School of Dentistry, Postgraduate of Orthodontics, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.

Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria-Varese, ASST Sette Laghi, Circolo Hospital and Macchi Foundation, Varese, Italy.

出版信息

Minerva Dent Oral Sci. 2025 Aug;74(4):223-231. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6329.25.05097-1. Epub 2025 May 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mandibular reposition devices (MRDs) are a viable option for addressing snoring and mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) as another possibility to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation during sleep. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of OSAS MRDs with variation in vertical dimension, considering the OSAS indexes: Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI), Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI) and Snoring Index.

METHODS

Eleven patients with different level of OSAS were enrolled in this study. The patients in the study were evaluated at three different times (T0, T1, T2). At T0 the patients underwent a basal polysomnography (PSG) without any oral appliance. At T1, the PSG was executed using MRD at 70% of protrusion and a vertical dimension consequent of protrusion. The vertical dimension determined by a protruded position is the one that is caused by the repositioning of the mandible. At the T2, the patients used the same appliance with 70% of protrusion, adding a uniform 6-mm bite resin plane between the existing upper and lower splints of the MRD, in the lateral area. The patients enrolled in this study did not tolerate the CPAP. T-test for paired samples was used to assess the possible statistical differences between AHI and ODI (T0, T1 and T2). The snoring indexes were analyzed through Friedman test for corelated sample.

RESULTS

The mean value of AHI (T0) was 30.17±19.51. The mean AHI of T1 was 10.60±9.35, while the mean value of T2 was 5.41±3.25. The mean value of ODI (T0) was 29.02; SD±20.74. The mean ODI of T1 was 10.46±9.48, while the mean value of T2 was 5.40±3.41. Analyzing AHI and ODI, there was a significant statistical difference between T0 and T1 (P<0.05), between T1 and T2 (P<0.05) and between T0 and T2 (P<0.05). There was not any statistical difference for snoring indexes between T0, T1 and T2. (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results of this study, the major improvement of AHI and ODI is reached through the usage of MRD with an increase of vertical dimension. Considering all the limits of the study, it is possible to affirm that research should still take account of the vertical dimension as a possible factor when treating OSAS with oral appliance.

摘要

背景

下颌重新定位装置(MRD)是解决打鼾以及轻度至中度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)的一种可行选择,是睡眠期间持续气道正压通气(CPAP)之外的另一种可能性。本研究的目的是考虑OSAS指标:呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)、氧饱和度下降指数(ODI)和打鼾指数,评估垂直维度变化的OSAS MRD的疗效。

方法

11例不同程度OSAS患者纳入本研究。研究中的患者在三个不同时间(T0、T1、T2)接受评估。在T0时,患者在未使用任何口腔矫治器的情况下接受基础多导睡眠图(PSG)检查。在T1时,使用MRD,下颌前伸70%并处于前伸后的垂直维度进行PSG检查。由前伸位置确定的垂直维度是由下颌重新定位引起的。在T2时,患者使用相同的矫治器,下颌前伸70%,并在MRD现有的上下夹板之间的外侧区域添加一个均匀的6毫米咬合树脂平面。本研究纳入的患者不耐受CPAP。采用配对样本t检验评估AHI和ODI(T0、T1和T2)之间可能存在的统计学差异。打鼾指数通过相关样本的Friedman检验进行分析。

结果

AHI(T0)的平均值为30.17±19.51。T1的平均AHI为10.60±9.35,而T2的平均值为5.41±3.25。ODI(T0)的平均值为29.02;标准差±20.74。T1的平均ODI为10.46±9.48,而T2的平均值为5.40±3.41。分析AHI和ODI,T0和T1之间(P<0.05)、T1和T2之间(P<0.05)以及T0和T2之间(P<0.05)存在显著统计学差异。T0、T1和T2之间的打鼾指数没有任何统计学差异(P>0.05)。

结论

根据本研究结果,通过增加垂直维度使用MRD可使AHI和ODI得到显著改善。考虑到本研究的所有局限性,可以肯定的是,在用口腔矫治器治疗OSAS时,研究仍应将垂直维度作为一个可能的因素加以考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验