Zhai Ruyue, Yang Shaoqing
School of Psychology and Mental Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 30;16:1514024. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1514024. eCollection 2025.
Previous studies on the impact of paternal and maternal depression on adolescent depression have shown inconsistent findings, and none have examined the influence of parental depression trajectories on adolescent depression trajectories. This study aims to explore the natural developmental patterns of paternal, maternal, and adolescent depression, as well as the predictive effects of parental depression trajectories on adolescent depression trajectories through a longitudinal survey.
Based on the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), a total of 1,378 adolescents and their parents were ultimately included in the study. The adolescents and their parents underwent up to three waves of assessments, with each wave separated by 2 years, spanning 6 years (from 2016 to 2020). Latent Growth Modeling (LGM) was used to examine the developmental trajectories of paternal, maternal, and adolescent depression, and the predictive effects of parental depression trajectories on adolescent depression trajectories.
The results of the Latent Growth Curve Analysis revealed an upward trend in the longitudinal measurement of paternal depression (β = 0.483, < 0.001) and adolescent depression (β = 0.318, < 0.001), while maternal depression showed a downward trend (β = -0.340, = 0.015). The results of the parallel process model indicated that the intercept and slope of paternal depression significantly predicted the intercept and slope of adolescent depression, respectively (β = 0.169, = 0.015; β = 0.488, = 0.008). However, the intercept of paternal depression did not significantly predict the slope of adolescent depression (β = 0.129, > 0.05). Similarly, the intercept and slope of maternal depression significantly predicted the intercept and slope of adolescent depression, respectively (β = 0.253, < 0.001; β = 0.371, = 0.006). The intercept of maternal depression did not significantly predict the slope of adolescent depression (β = 0.033, > 0.05).
Both paternal and maternal depression should be given equal attention. The developmental trajectories of both paternal and maternal depression influence the developmental trajectory of adolescent depression.
以往关于父母抑郁对青少年抑郁影响的研究结果并不一致,且尚无研究考察父母抑郁轨迹对青少年抑郁轨迹的影响。本研究旨在通过纵向调查探讨父母及青少年抑郁的自然发展模式,以及父母抑郁轨迹对青少年抑郁轨迹的预测作用。
基于中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS),最终共有1378名青少年及其父母纳入本研究。青少年及其父母接受了多达三轮评估,每轮间隔2年,历时6年(从2016年至2020年)。采用潜在增长模型(LGM)考察父母及青少年抑郁的发展轨迹,以及父母抑郁轨迹对青少年抑郁轨迹的预测作用。
潜在增长曲线分析结果显示,父亲抑郁(β = 0.483,< 0.001)和青少年抑郁(β = 0.318,< 0.001)的纵向测量呈上升趋势,而母亲抑郁呈下降趋势(β = -0.340,= 0.015)。平行过程模型结果表明,父亲抑郁的截距和斜率分别显著预测青少年抑郁的截距和斜率(β = 0.169,= 0.015;β = 0.488,= 0.008)。然而,父亲抑郁的截距并未显著预测青少年抑郁的斜率(β = 0.129,> 0.05)。同样,母亲抑郁的截距和斜率分别显著预测青少年抑郁 的截距和斜率(β = 0.253,< 0.001;β = 0.371,= 0.006)。母亲抑郁的截距并未显著预测青少年抑郁的斜率(β = 0.033,> 0.05)。
父母双方的抑郁都应得到同等关注。父母抑郁的发展轨迹均会影响青少年抑郁的发展轨迹。