Suppr超能文献

无阿片类药物护理路径与基于阿片类药物的标准护理对腹腔镜减肥手术后疼痛及术后恢复质量的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验。

Effects of an opioid-free care pathway vs. opioid-based standard care on postoperative pain and postoperative quality of recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: A multicentre randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Olausson Alexander, Jildenstål Pether, Andréll Paulin, Angelini Eva, Stenberg Erik, Wallenius Ville, Öhrström Henrik, Thörn Sven-Egron, Wolf Axel

机构信息

From the Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg (AO, PJ, EA, AW), Department of Health Sciences, Lund University (PJ), Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund (PJ), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg (PA, S-ET), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine/Pain Centre, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg (PA), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro (ES), Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg (VW), Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg (VW), Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Örebro University Hospital, Region Örebro län, Örebro (HÖ), Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lindesberg Hospital, Region Örebro län, Lindesberg (HÖ), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden (S-ET, AW), Institute of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway (AW) and Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Sweden (AW).

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2025 Aug 1;42(8):714-726. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002193. Epub 2025 May 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA) may enhance postoperative recovery after bariatric surgery, but its combined effect with opioid-free interventions has not been studied.

OBJECTIVES

To compare postoperative pain and recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery with a total opioid-free care pathway and conventional opioid-based treatment.

DESIGN

A multicentre nonblinded controlled trial.

SETTING

Two university hospitals in Sweden.

PATIENTS

Adult patients scheduled for laparoscopic bariatric surgery were enrolled between May 2019 and November 2023. Of 837 patients screened, 112 were randomised, and 110 were included in the analysis: 55 in the intervention and 55 in the control group.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomised to an opioid-based standard care (control group) or to an opioid-free care pathway (intervention group), including intraoperative OFA and postoperative first-line transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the change in patient-reported postoperative pain intensity on a numerical rating scale (NRS) from arrival in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) until discharge to the surgical ward. Key secondary outcomes were postoperative pain intensity, in-hospital opioid consumption, and postoperative quality of recovery scale (PQRS) scores.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the groups regarding the changes in pain intensity from arrival in PACU until discharge to the ward, with mean ± SD changes in NRS of 3.20 ± 3.01 (intervention) vs. 3.15 ± 2.25 (control); mean difference (MD) 0.04 [(95% confidence interval (CI), -1.00 to 1.08); P  = 0.97], and pain intensity at 24 h ( P  = 0.078), 72 h ( P  = 0.060), and 3 months ( P  = 0.30) postoperatively. The intervention group had a significantly lower opioid consumption in the PACU; mean morphine equivalents 6.08 ± 12.31 vs. 51.1 ± 14.9 mg; MD -45.0 (95% CI, -50.1 to -39.8) mg; P  < 0.0001; and during the hospital stay MD -40.3 (95% CI, -54.4 to -25.9) mg; P  < 0.0001. Total PQRS scores did not differ significantly over the 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The opioid-free care pathway offers patients pain relief and recovery outcomes comparable to conventional opioid-based care and reduces opioid use after laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03756961.

摘要

背景

无阿片类药物麻醉(OFA)可能会促进减重手术后的术后恢复,但其与无阿片类药物干预措施的联合效果尚未得到研究。

目的

比较采用全无阿片类药物护理路径和传统阿片类药物治疗的腹腔镜减重手术后的术后疼痛和恢复情况。

设计

一项多中心非盲对照试验。

地点

瑞典的两家大学医院。

患者

2019年5月至2023年11月期间纳入计划进行腹腔镜减重手术的成年患者。在837名筛查患者中,112名被随机分组,110名纳入分析:干预组55名,对照组55名。

干预措施

患者被随机分为阿片类药物标准护理组(对照组)或无阿片类药物护理路径组(干预组),包括术中OFA和术后一线经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)治疗。

主要结局指标

主要结局是患者报告的从进入麻醉后护理单元(PACU)到出院至外科病房期间,数字评分量表(NRS)上术后疼痛强度的变化。关键次要结局是术后疼痛强度、住院期间阿片类药物消耗量以及术后恢复质量量表(PQRS)评分。

结果

两组从进入PACU到出院至病房期间疼痛强度的变化无差异,NRS的平均±标准差变化为3.20±3.01(干预组)对3.15±2.25(对照组);平均差异(MD)0.04 [(95%置信区间(CI),-1.00至1.08);P = 0.97],以及术后24小时(P = 0.078)、72小时(P = 0.060)和3个月(P = 0.30)时的疼痛强度。干预组在PACU的阿片类药物消耗量显著更低;平均吗啡当量为6.08±12.31对51.1±14.9毫克;MD -45.0(95% CI,-50.1至-39.8)毫克;P < 0.0001;住院期间MD -40.3(95% CI,-54.4至-25.9)毫克;P < 0.0001。在3个月的随访期间,PQRS总分无显著差异。

结论

无阿片类药物护理路径为患者提供了与传统阿片类药物护理相当的疼痛缓解和恢复结果,并减少了腹腔镜减重手术后的阿片类药物使用。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03756961。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ac/12237137/c56fff57ad1b/ejanet-42-714-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验