Wu Mengqiu, Sun Peng, Zhao Baitian, Yang Hang, Xia Yi, Nie Man, Cai Qingqing, Huang Huiqiang, Huang He, Xia Zhongjun, Wang Yu, Li Zhiming, Liu Panpan
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2025 May 15;74(7):206. doi: 10.1007/s00262-025-04041-z.
The prognosis of early unfavorable and advanced stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) remains suboptimal with the widely used ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) regimen. Novel agents such as brentuximab vedotin (BV) and anti-PD-1 antibody have demonstrated high efficacy and good tolerance in relapsed/refractory cHL and have also shown promising results in the frontline setting. However, concurrent administration of anti-PD-1 antibody plus AVD in comparison with traditional ABVD regimen alone in untreated classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) has yet to be adequately studied in real-world clinical practice.
We enrolled eligible adult patients with histologically confirmed cHL who had received initial treatment with the ABVD regimen, or the novel combination regimens of anti-PD1-AVD. The study endpoints included modified progression-free survival (mPFS) and complete response (CR) after 2 cycles of therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance clinical variables between regimens prior to efficacy comparisons.
Of 172 patients, 137 received the ABVD regimen and 35 received the anti-PD1-AVD regimen. With a median follow-up of 37.7 months, significantly prolonged 3-year modified PFS was reported for anti-PD1-AVD versus ABVD (PSM: 91.0 vs. 61.6%, p = 0.032). Significantly improved CR rate was observed with anti-PD1-AVD versus ABVD (PSM: 86.7 vs. 63.8%, p = 0.049).
In this real-world study, concurrent anti-PD1 antibody with AVD showed significantly prolonged modified PFS and improved CR rate after cycle 2 versus ABVD regimen, supporting the use of novel agents in frontline therapy.
对于早期预后不良和晚期经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤(cHL),广泛使用的ABVD(多柔比星、博来霉素、长春花碱和达卡巴嗪)方案的预后仍不理想。诸如维布妥昔单抗(BV)和抗PD-1抗体等新型药物在复发/难治性cHL中已显示出高疗效和良好耐受性,并且在一线治疗中也显示出有前景的结果。然而,在未经治疗的经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤(cHL)中,与单独使用传统ABVD方案相比,抗PD-1抗体联合AVD的疗效在真实世界临床实践中尚未得到充分研究。
我们纳入了组织学确诊为cHL且接受过ABVD方案或抗PD1-AVD新型联合方案初始治疗的符合条件的成年患者。研究终点包括治疗2个周期后的改良无进展生存期(mPFS)和完全缓解(CR)。在进行疗效比较之前,采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡各方案之间的临床变量。
172例患者中,137例接受ABVD方案,35例接受抗PD1-AVD方案。中位随访37.7个月,抗PD1-AVD组的3年改良PFS显著长于ABVD组(PSM:91.0%对61.6%,p = 0.032)。抗PD1-AVD组的CR率显著高于ABVD组(PSM:86.7%对63.8%,p = 0.049)。
在这项真实世界研究中,与ABVD方案相比,抗PD1抗体联合AVD在第2周期后显示出改良PFS显著延长和CR率提高,支持在一线治疗中使用新型药物。