Suppr超能文献

拔牙与非拔牙矫治方案治疗安氏I类错牙合畸形的三维咽气道及舌骨变化:固定正畸矫治器与隐形矫治器的对比研究

Three-dimensional pharyngeal airway and hyoid bone changes in skeletal class I malocclusion treated with extraction and non-extraction protocols: a comparative study of fixed orthodontic appliance and clear aligners.

作者信息

Al-Somairi Majedh Abdo Ali, Yan Yuwen, Alhammadi Maged S, Al-Worafi Naseem Ali, Alyafrusee Enas Senan, Almaqrami Bushra Sufyan, Sharhan Hasan M, Al-Tayar Barakat, Zheng Bowen, Liu Yi

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, Shenyang Clinical Medical Research Center of Orthodontic Disease, Nanjing North Street 117#, He-Ping District Shenyang, Shenyang, 110002, P.R. China.

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ibb University, Ibb, Republic of Yemen.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2025 May 15;29(6):299. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06367-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to provide a comprehensive three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of fixed appliances (FAs) and clear aligners (CAs) on pharyngeal airway (PA) dimensions and hyoid bone (HB) positioning in skeletal Class I malocclusion patients treated with extraction and non-extraction protocols, comparing the effects within each protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study involved 120 adult patients divided into extraction and non-extraction groups, each further subdivided equally into those treated with FAs and CAs. PA segmentation and measurements were conducted with Dolphin 11.8 (Dolphin Imaging and Management Solutions, Chatsworth, CA). The PA was analyzed in the nasopharyngeal (NP), oropharyngeal (OP), and hypopharyngeal (HP), total pharyngeal (TP) airway, while HB parameters were measured using InVivo 6.0.3 (Anatomage, San Jose, CA). Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed, with a significance level set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

None of the evaluated parameters showed a significant difference in the baseline, indicating almost comparable groups. Inter-group comparisons showed that within the non-extraction group, FAs caused greater decreases in OP sagittal width and HP lateral width and more significant increases in vertical hyoid position (H-FH) compared to CAs (P < 0.05). In the extraction group, FAs resulted in greater decreases in OP lateral width and volume, HP volume, and more significant H-FH increases than CAs (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Fixed appliances caused greater reductions in oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal dimensions and more significant changes in hyoid bone position compared to clear aligners, particularly in extraction cases. Clinicians should consider these effects when selecting treatment modalities, especially for patients with airway concerns.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Fixed appliances significantly impact pharyngeal airway dimensions and hyoid bone positioning, while clear aligners have milder effects, emphasizing the need for careful treatment planning.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对接受拔牙和非拔牙矫治方案的安氏Ⅰ类错牙合患者,使用固定矫治器(FAs)和隐形矫治器(CAs)治疗时的咽气道(PA)尺寸和舌骨(HB)位置进行全面的三维(3D)评估,并比较每种矫治方案内的效果。

材料与方法

本回顾性研究纳入120例成年患者,分为拔牙组和非拔牙组,每组再平均分为接受FAs治疗和CAs治疗的患者。使用Dolphin 11.8(Dolphin Imaging and Management Solutions,加利福尼亚州查茨沃思)进行PA分割和测量。在鼻咽(NP)、口咽(OP)和下咽(HP)、总咽(TP)气道分析PA,同时使用InVivo 6.0.3(Anatomage,加利福尼亚州圣何塞)测量HB参数。进行描述性和分析性统计,显著性水平设定为P < 0.05。

结果

所有评估参数在基线时均无显著差异,表明各组几乎具有可比性。组间比较显示,在非拔牙组中,与CAs相比,FAs导致OP矢状径和HP横向宽度减小更大,舌骨垂直位置(H-FH)增加更显著(P < 0.05)。在拔牙组中,与CAs相比,FAs导致OP横向宽度和体积、HP体积减小更大,H-FH增加更显著(P < 0.05)。

结论

与隐形矫治器相比,固定矫治器导致口咽和下咽尺寸减小更大,舌骨位置变化更显著,尤其是在拔牙病例中。临床医生在选择治疗方式时应考虑这些影响,特别是对于有气道问题的患者。

临床意义

固定矫治器对咽气道尺寸和舌骨位置有显著影响,而隐形矫治器的影响较小,强调了仔细制定治疗计划的必要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验