Forman David P, Boughter Joseph R, McAfee Nicholas W, Ginley Meredith K, Whelan James P, Pfund Rory A
Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico.
Tennessee Institute for Gambling Education and Research, University of Memphis.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2025 Jun;39(4):365-374. doi: 10.1037/adb0001069. Epub 2025 May 15.
To conduct a systematic review of motivational interviewing (MI) integrity in randomized controlled trials and to conduct a meta-analysis on the effect of MI-informed interventions compared to control conditions on gambling behavior and gambling disorder symptom severity at posttreatment and follow-up.
Five databases were searched to identify published and unpublished studies of randomized controlled trials. Studies randomizing participants to a MI-informed intervention or a control condition that did not receive MI were eligible. A random-effects meta-analysis of Hedges's g effect sizes representing outcomes of MI-informed interventions versus control at posttreatment and follow-up was conducted.
Seven studies representing 796 participants were identified. MI-informed interventions varied greatly in their descriptions, and no intervention met the proposed criteria for establishing MI integrity in clinical trials (Miller & Rollnick, 2014). Outcomes between conditions were almost equivalent for gambling frequency ( = -0.04), gambling expenditure ( = -0.03), and gambling disorder symptom severity ( = 0.01) at posttreatment. Similarly, there was almost no difference in each outcome at follow-up (s = -0.02, -0.02, and -0.10).
Overall, the findings indicated limited available knowledge to establish the integrity of MI and the efficacy of MI-informed interventions among individuals with problem gambling and gambling disorder. Based on the available evidence, previous meta-analyses have overestimated the isolated effect of MI-informed interventions on gambling behavior and gambling disorder symptom severity. Future research will require objective fidelity monitoring to ensure adherence to MI and use study designs that isolate the effect of MI interventions on gambling outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
对随机对照试验中动机性访谈(MI)的完整性进行系统评价,并对基于MI的干预措施与对照条件相比,在治疗后和随访时对赌博行为及赌博障碍症状严重程度的影响进行荟萃分析。
检索五个数据库,以识别已发表和未发表的随机对照试验研究。将参与者随机分配到基于MI的干预措施组或未接受MI的对照组的研究符合条件。对代表基于MI的干预措施与对照组在治疗后和随访时结果的Hedges's g效应量进行随机效应荟萃分析。
确定了七项研究,共796名参与者。基于MI的干预措施在描述上差异很大,没有一种干预措施符合在临床试验中确立MI完整性的提议标准(Miller & Rollnick,2014)。治疗后,两组在赌博频率(g = -0.04)、赌博支出(g = -0.03)和赌博障碍症状严重程度(g = 0.01)方面的结果几乎相当。同样,随访时各项结果几乎没有差异(g分别为-0.02、-0.02和-0.10)。
总体而言,研究结果表明,在确定MI的完整性以及基于MI的干预措施对问题赌博和赌博障碍个体的疗效方面,现有知识有限。基于现有证据,先前的荟萃分析高估了基于MI的干预措施对赌博行为和赌博障碍症状严重程度的单独影响。未来的研究将需要客观的保真度监测,以确保遵循MI,并采用能够分离MI干预措施对赌博结果影响的研究设计。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)