Tabarin Antoine, Espiard Stéphanie, Deutschbein Timo, Amar Laurence, Vezzossi Delphine, Di Dalmazi Guido, Reznik Yves, Young Jacques, Desailloud Rachel, Goichot Bernard, Drui Delphine, Assié Guillaume, Lefebvre Hervé, Mai Knut, Castinetti Frédéric, Laboureau Sandrine, Terzolo Massimo, Ferriere Amandine, Georget Aurore, Frison Eric, Vantyghem Marie-Christine, Fassnacht Martin, Gosse Philippe
Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Metabolism and Nutrition, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Metabolism and Nutrition, CHU Lille, Inserm U1190, EGID, University of Lille, Lille, France.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2025 Jul;13(7):580-590. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(25)00062-2. Epub 2025 May 12.
Adrenal incidentalomas are found in 3-10% of adults undergoing abdominal imaging. Of these, 30-50% are responsible for mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS), which is frequently associated with hypertension. The impact of adrenalectomy on hypertension in patients with unilateral incidentalomas and MACS remains uncertain. The aim of the CHIRACIC study was to prospectively assess the impact of surgical excision of the incidentaloma on blood pressure with a randomised trial combining accurate blood pressure measurement and standardisation of antihypertensive treatment.
CHIRACIC was a multicentre, superiority, open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial performed at 17 university hospitals in France, Italy, and Germany. Adults with hypertension with MACS entered a run-in phase to confirm hypertension with multiple home blood pressure measurements (HBPM) before blood pressure was normalised with standardised stepped-care antihypertensive treatment. Eligible participants were then randomly assigned (1:1) to adrenalectomy or conservative management. Randomisation was blocked (random block size of 4 and 6) and stratified by intensity of antihypertensive treatment. Participants were followed up for 13 months and systematic attempts were made to gradually reduce antihypertensive treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of normotensive participants using HBPM who reduced their antihypertensive treatment in the intention-to-treat population at study completion. Key secondary endpoints included 24 h ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM), mean change in antihypertensive treatment, and the proportion of participants with antihypertensive treatment at study completion. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02364089, and is completed.
Between April 9, 2015 and Nov 23, 2022, 78 patients were enrolled, and 52 eligible participants were randomly assigned to adrenalectomy (n=26, 23 underwent adrenalectomy and completed the study) or conservative management (n=26, 25 completed the study). The median age of participants was 63·3 years (IQR 57·4-68·2) and 36 (69%) were female. At study completion, a reduction in antihypertensive treatment with normal HBPM was observed in 12 (46%) of 26 participants treated with adrenalectomy and in four (15%) of 26 treated conservatively (adjusted risk difference [RD] 0·34 [95% CI 0·11 to 0·58]; p=0·0038). Similar results of smaller magnitude were observed for systolic blood pressure during 24 h ABPM. There were ten (43%) of 23 participants still needing antihypertensive treatment in the adrenalectomy group and 24 (96%) of 25 in the conservative management group (adjusted RD -0·58 [95% CI -0·78 to -0·38]; p<0·0001). Mean antihypertensive treatment step was 0·8 (SD 1·1) in the adrenalectomy group and 3·0 (1·4) in the conservative management groups (adjusted difference -2·05 [95% CI -2·61 to -1·50]; p<0·0001]. The number of patients with normal systolic HBPM and no hypertensive treatment was 12 (52%) of 23 in the adrenalectomy group and none in the conservative management group. Serious adverse events occurred in eight (35%) of 23 participants in the adrenalectomy group and eight (31%) of 26 participants in the conservative management group. Three serious adverse events for three (13%) participants were related to the surgery (post-surgical wall pain and hypotension).
MACS associated with unilateral adrenal incidentalomas is responsible for secondary hypertension that can be safely improved by minimally-invasive adrenalectomy.
French Ministry of Health and the German Research Foundation.
在接受腹部影像学检查的成年人中,肾上腺偶发瘤的发现率为3% - 10%。其中,30% - 50%会导致轻度自主性皮质醇分泌(MACS),这常与高血压相关。肾上腺切除术对单侧偶发瘤合并MACS患者高血压的影响仍不确定。CHIRACIC研究的目的是通过一项结合精确血压测量和抗高血压治疗标准化的随机试验,前瞻性评估偶发瘤手术切除对血压的影响。
CHIRACIC是一项多中心、优效性、开放标签、平行分组的随机对照试验,在法国、意大利和德国的17家大学医院进行。患有MACS的高血压成年患者进入导入期,通过多次家庭血压测量(HBPM)确认高血压,然后采用标准化的阶梯式抗高血压治疗使血压正常化。符合条件的参与者随后被随机分配(1:1)接受肾上腺切除术或保守治疗。随机分组采用区组化(随机区组大小为4和6),并按抗高血压治疗强度分层。参与者随访13个月,并系统地尝试逐步减少抗高血压治疗。主要终点是在研究完成时,在意向性治疗人群中使用HBPM血压正常且减少抗高血压治疗的参与者比例。关键次要终点包括24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)、抗高血压治疗的平均变化以及研究完成时接受抗高血压治疗的参与者比例。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT02364089,现已完成。
2015年4月9日至2022年11月23日期间,共纳入78例患者,52例符合条件的参与者被随机分配至肾上腺切除术组(n = 26,23例接受肾上腺切除术并完成研究)或保守治疗组(n = 26,25例完成研究)。参与者的中位年龄为63.3岁(四分位间距57.4 - 68.2),36例(69%)为女性。研究完成时,肾上腺切除术组26例参与者中有12例(46%)使用HBPM血压正常且抗高血压治疗减少,保守治疗组26例中有4例(15%)(调整风险差[RD] 0.34 [95% CI 0.11至0.58];p = 0.0038)。24小时ABPM期间收缩压也观察到类似但幅度较小的结果。肾上腺切除术组23例参与者中有10例(43%)仍需抗高血压治疗,保守治疗组25例中有24例(96%)(调整RD -0.58 [95% CI -0.78至-0.38];p < 0.0001)。肾上腺切除术组抗高血压治疗步骤的平均值为0.8(标准差1.1),保守治疗组为3.0(1.4)(调整差异 -2.05 [95% CI -2.61至-1.50];p < 0.0001)。肾上腺切除术组23例中有12例(52%)收缩期HBPM正常且无需抗高血压治疗,保守治疗组无。肾上腺切除术组23例参与者中有8例(35%)发生严重不良事件,保守治疗组26例中有8例(31%)。3例(13%)参与者的3起严重不良事件与手术相关(术后腹壁疼痛和低血压)。
与单侧肾上腺偶发瘤相关的MACS是继发性高血压的原因,微创肾上腺切除术可安全改善这种情况。
法国卫生部和德国研究基金会。