Saito Mitsue, Iihara Hirotoshi, Shimokawa Mototsugu, Udagawa Ryoko, Tsuneizumi Michiko, Futamura Manabu, Ishikawa Yuko, Ogata Hideaki, Bando Hiroko, Shima Hiroaki, Hosoya Keiko, Mukohara Toru, Tanaka Kenichiro, Ikuta Tomoki, Kawate Takahiko, Ishida Kazushige, Nakai Katsuya, Uomori Toshitaka, Kutomi Goro, Ozeki Rie, Yanagisawa Naotake
Department of Breast Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Pharmacy, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu-city, Gifu, Japan.
Lancet Oncol. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00233-5.
The addition of 10 mg olanzapine to the standard triplet antiemetic therapy has shown superiority in controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting compared with triplet therapy alone for highly emetogenic chemotherapy, albeit with sedative side-effects. We aimed to investigate if administering 5 mg of olanzapine at home after anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide chemotherapy, rather than before chemotherapy, can maintain efficacy in controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting while minimising sedative side-effects and associated risks.
This was a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, done in 15 hospitals and cancer centres in Japan. Eligible patients were female adults aged 20 years or older with stage I-III breast cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, who were scheduled to receive intravenous anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy, and were naive to chemotherapy or had never received moderately to highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to oral olanzapine 5 mg or placebo via the central registration system. Randomisation was performed using blocked stratification, with age (≥55 years vs <55 years) and institution as stratification factors and a block size of two. Allocation was concealed and masking was achieved by using tablets with identical appearance. Treatment was administered at home within 5 h after the end of anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide administration and before the patient's evening meal on day 1 to minimise the risk of sedation during hospital visits and transportation, and on the next 3 days after their evening meal, both with pre-chemotherapeutical application of intravenous dexamethasone 9·9 mg, intravenous palonosetron 0·75 mg, and oral aprepitant 125 mg on day 1 followed by an additional dose of aprepitant 80 mg on days 2 and 3 or intravenous fosaprepitant 150 mg as a premedication on day 1. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a complete response, defined as no vomiting and no rescue medication during the overall phase (0-120 h after the initiation of anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide) based on patient diary. The primary analysis was done by modified intention-to-treat, including all patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment and had at least one efficacy evaluation. Safety was analysed in all patients who received any treatment. This trial was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCT1031200134, and is complete.
Between Oct 26, 2020 and Nov 2, 2022, 500 female patients from 15 medical institutions in Japan were randomly assigned to receive olanzapine (n=251) or placebo (n=249). Median age at enrolment was 52 years (IQR 45-60) in the olanzapine group and 51 years (46-60) in the placebo group. Data on gender and race or ethnicity were not collected. The median follow-up was 168 h (IQR 168-168). 480 participants (246 in the olanzapine group and 234 in the placebo group) received at least one dose of study medication and were eligible for the efficacy analysis. The complete response rate in the olanzapine group (58·1%, n=143) was significantly higher than in the placebo group (35·5%, n=83; difference 22·7%, 95% CI 14·0-31·4%; p<0·0001) during the overall phase. The most frequently reported severe or very severe symptoms based on the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) version 1.0 were anorexia (33 [13%] of 246 patients in the olanzapine group vs 89 [38%] of 235 in the placebo group) and constipation (30 [12%] vs 37 [16%]). Severe or very severe concentration impairment was reported in 25 (10%) of 246 patients in the olanzapine group and 34 (14%) of 235 patients in the placebo group. Experimental drug-related grade 3-4 adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 included somnolence (four [2%] of 246 patients in the olanzapine group vs none of 235 in the placebo group), and concentration impairment (two [1%] vs none). There were no deaths.
Post-chemotherapy administration of 5 mg olanzapine in combination with triplet antiemetic therapy before anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy significantly improved the complete response rate for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting during the overall phase compared with placebo in female patients with breast cancer receiving outpatient chemotherapy, with an acceptable level of safety. The findings represent a substantial advancement in managing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and provide assurance that the safe and effective administration of olanzapine can be achieved at a dosage of 5 mg.
The Capture of Outstanding Clinical Research and Evolution (CORE) project at Juntendo University.
对于高致吐性化疗,在标准三联抗呕吐疗法基础上加用10 mg奥氮平,与单纯三联疗法相比,在控制化疗引起的恶心和呕吐方面显示出优势,尽管存在镇静副作用。我们旨在研究在蒽环类药物加环磷酰胺化疗后而非化疗前在家服用5 mg奥氮平,是否能在控制化疗引起的恶心和呕吐方面维持疗效,同时将镇静副作用及相关风险降至最低。
这是一项3期、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验,在日本的15家医院和癌症中心进行。符合条件的患者为年龄在20岁及以上、患有I - III期乳腺癌、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为0 - 1的成年女性,她们计划接受基于蒽环类药物加环磷酰胺的静脉化疗,且未接受过化疗或从未接受过中度至高致吐性化疗。符合条件的患者通过中央登记系统以1:1的比例随机分配接受口服5 mg奥氮平或安慰剂。随机分组采用区组分层法,以年龄(≥55岁与<55岁)和机构作为分层因素,区组大小为2。分配方案被隐藏,通过使用外观相同的片剂实现盲法。在蒽环类药物加环磷酰胺给药结束后5小时内且在患者第1天晚餐前在家中进行治疗,以尽量减少住院就诊和运输期间的镇静风险,在接下来的3天晚餐后也进行治疗,第1天均预先静脉注射地塞米松9.9 mg、静脉注射帕洛诺司琼0.75 mg和口服阿瑞匹坦125 mg,随后在第2天和第3天额外给予阿瑞匹坦80 mg或在第1天静脉注射福沙匹坦150 mg作为预处理。主要终点是完全缓解的患者比例,根据患者日记,定义为在整个阶段(蒽环类药物加环磷酰胺开始后0 - 120小时)无呕吐且未使用解救药物。主要分析采用改良意向性分析,包括所有接受至少一剂研究治疗且至少有一次疗效评估的患者。对所有接受任何治疗的患者进行安全性分析。该试验已在日本临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为jRCT1031200134,且已完成。
在2020年10月26日至2022年11月2日期间,来自日本15家医疗机构的500名女性患者被随机分配接受奥氮平(n = 251)或安慰剂(n = 249)。奥氮平组入组时的中位年龄为52岁(IQR 45 - 60),安慰剂组为51岁(46 - 60)。未收集性别和种族或民族数据。中位随访时间为168小时(IQR 168 - 168)。480名参与者(奥氮平组246名,安慰剂组234名)接受了至少一剂研究药物且符合疗效分析条件。在整个阶段,奥氮平组的完全缓解率(58.1%,n = 143)显著高于安慰剂组(35.5%,n = 83;差异22.7%,95% CI 14.0 - 31.4%;p < 0.0001)。根据不良事件通用术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)1.0版的患者报告结局,最常报告的严重或非常严重的症状是食欲减退(奥氮平组246名患者中有33名[13%],安慰剂组235名患者中有89名[38%])和便秘(30名[12%]对37名[16%])。奥氮平组246名患者中有25名(10%)报告有严重或非常严重的注意力障碍,安慰剂组235名患者中有34名(14%)。根据不良事件通用术语标准第5.0版,与试验药物相关的3 - 4级不良事件包括嗜睡(奥氮平组246名患者中有4名[2%],安慰剂组235名患者中无)和注意力障碍(2名[1%]对无)。无死亡病例。
在接受门诊化疗的乳腺癌女性患者中,在基于蒽环类药物加环磷酰胺的化疗前,三联抗呕吐疗法联合化疗后给予5 mg奥氮平,与安慰剂相比,在整个阶段显著提高了化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的完全缓解率,且安全性可接受。这些发现代表了在管理化疗引起的恶心和呕吐方面的重大进展,并确保了5 mg剂量的奥氮平能够安全有效地给药。
日本顺天堂大学卓越临床研究与发展(CORE)项目。