Suppr超能文献

[硬膜外注射吗啡用于治疗顽固性癌痛。方法与障碍]

[Peridural morphine in intractable cancer pains. Means and obstacles].

作者信息

Bayer-Berger M M, Arnér S

出版信息

Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1985;4(4):343-50. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(85)80103-9.

Abstract

Long-term analgesia with epidural morphine (EM) is a new tool in the management of intractable cancer pain. Twenty-six out of 160 cancer patients referred to the Pain Division for pain assessment were selected for analgesia with long-term epidural morphine, so aiming to define its place amongst more traditional methods of treatment, such as drugs, nerve-blocks, neurosurgery or radiotherapy. All 26 patients were cases of conventional analgesic failure, with very advanced cancer states. Thirteen patients became absolutely pain free throughout the treatment period: five of them were even allowed home. Another ten patients were satisfied with EM, though some residual pain of neurogenic and visceral type persisted. In three patients, epidural morphine was judged as a complete failure. The 134 other patients could be managed with either of the other above mentioned techniques. The most important selection criterion for patients requiring epidural morphine seemed to be continuous multiple site bilateral pain of deep somatic origin. The response was variable in continuous visceral pain, while neurogenic, cutaneous and intermittent pain due to intestinal obstruction responded only exceptionally. EM was most valuable in terminal situations when systemic opiates failed to give satisfactory analgesia, or in acute transitory situations, while waiting for a response to cancer-orientated therapy. Epidural morphine considerably improved the patients' quality of life, compared with conventional methods tried beforehand. Analgesic methods in cancer are palliative procedures. In terminal or temporary situations, other more invasive methods are not suited. The EM technique is simple, adjustable to advancing pain and has few side-effects, especially when compared with neurolytic and neurosurgical procedures.

摘要

硬膜外吗啡(EM)长期镇痛是治疗顽固性癌痛的一种新方法。160名转诊至疼痛科进行疼痛评估的癌症患者中,有26名被选用于硬膜外吗啡长期镇痛,旨在确定其在药物、神经阻滞、神经外科手术或放疗等更传统治疗方法中的地位。所有26例患者均为传统镇痛失败病例,癌症病情非常严重。13例患者在整个治疗期间完全无痛:其中5例甚至获准回家。另外10例患者对EM治疗满意,尽管仍存在一些神经源性和内脏型残留疼痛。3例患者硬膜外吗啡治疗被判定为完全失败。其余134例患者可采用上述其他技术之一进行治疗。需要硬膜外吗啡治疗的患者最重要的选择标准似乎是源于深部躯体的持续性多部位双侧疼痛。对于持续性内脏疼痛,反应不一,而神经源性、皮肤性疼痛以及肠梗阻引起的间歇性疼痛仅有个别病例有反应。当全身使用阿片类药物无法提供满意镇痛效果时,EM在终末期情况或急性短暂情况下,即在等待针对癌症的治疗起效时最有价值。与预先尝试的传统方法相比,硬膜外吗啡显著改善了患者的生活质量。癌症的镇痛方法是姑息性治疗手段。在终末期或临时情况下,其他更具侵入性的方法并不适用。EM技术简单,可根据疼痛进展进行调整,且副作用较少,尤其是与神经溶解和神经外科手术相比。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验