Wagner E M, Traystman R J
Ann Biomed Eng. 1985;13(3-4):311-20. doi: 10.1007/BF02584249.
The cerebral blood flow (CBF) response to changes in perfusion pressure mediated through decreases in arterial pressure, increases in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure and increases in jugular venous pressure was studied in anesthetized dogs. A preparation was developed in which each of the three relevant pressures could be controlled and manipulated independently of each other. In this preparation, the superior vena cava and femoral vein were cannulated and drained into a reservoir. Blood was pumped from the reservoir into the right atrium. With this system, mean arterial pressure and jugular venous pressure could be independently controlled. CSF pressure (measured in the lateral ventricle) could be manipulated via a cisternal puncture. Total and regional CBF responses to alterations in perfusion pressure were studied with the radiolabelled microsphere technique. Each hemisphere was sectioned into 13 regions: spinal cord, cerebellum, medulla, pons, midbrain, diencephalon, caudate, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and occipital, temporal, parietal and frontal lobes. Despite 30 mm Hg reductions in arterial pressure or increases in jugular venous pressure or CSF pressure, little change in CBF was observed provided the perfusion pressure (arterial pressure minus jugular venous pressure or CSF pressure depending on which pressure was of greater magnitude) was greater than the lower limit for cerebral autoregulation (approximately 60 mm Hg). However, when the perfusion pressure was reduced by any of the three different methods to levels less than 60 mm Hg (average of 48 mm Hg), a comparable reduction (25-35%) in both total and regional CBF was obtained. Thus comparable changes in the perfusion pressure gradient established by decreasing arterial pressure, increasing jugular venous pressure and increasing CSF pressure resulted in similar total and regional blood flow responses. Independent alterations of arterial and CSF pressures, and jugular venous pressure produce opposite changes in vascular transmural pressure yet result in similar CBF responses. These results show that cerebral autoregulation is a function of the perfusion pressure gradient and cannot be accounted for predominantly by myogenic mechanisms.
在麻醉犬身上研究了脑血流量(CBF)对通过动脉压降低、脑脊液(CSF)压力升高和颈静脉压升高介导的灌注压变化的反应。开发了一种制备方法,其中三种相关压力中的每一种都可以相互独立地控制和操纵。在这种制备方法中,将上腔静脉和股静脉插管并引流到一个储液器中。血液从储液器泵入右心房。通过这个系统,可以独立控制平均动脉压和颈静脉压。脑脊液压力(在侧脑室测量)可以通过小脑延髓池穿刺来操纵。用放射性微球技术研究了总脑血流量和局部脑血流量对灌注压改变的反应。每个半球被分成13个区域:脊髓、小脑、延髓、脑桥、中脑、间脑、尾状核、海马、海马旁回以及枕叶、颞叶、顶叶和额叶。尽管动脉压降低30 mmHg或颈静脉压或脑脊液压力升高,但只要灌注压(动脉压减去颈静脉压或脑脊液压力,取决于哪个压力值更大)大于脑自动调节的下限(约60 mmHg),就观察到脑血流量几乎没有变化。然而,当通过三种不同方法中的任何一种将灌注压降低到低于60 mmHg(平均48 mmHg)时,总脑血流量和局部脑血流量都出现了类似的降低(25 - 35%)。因此,通过降低动脉压、升高颈静脉压和升高脑脊液压力建立的灌注压梯度的类似变化导致了相似的总脑血流量和局部血流反应。动脉压和脑脊液压力以及颈静脉压的独立改变会使血管跨壁压产生相反的变化,但却导致相似的脑血流量反应。这些结果表明,脑自动调节是灌注压梯度的函数,不能主要由肌源性机制来解释。