Ruiz-Alonso María, Gómez Carlos, Stankewicz Tiffany, Castellón José A, Díez-Juan Antonio, Gómez Eva, Rubio Carmen, Simón Carlos, Valbuena Diana
Igenomix SL, Parque Tecnológico de Paterna, Ronda Narciso Monturiol Estarriol 11B, Paterna, Valencia, 46980, Spain.
Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Valencia, Valencia, 46010, Spain.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 15;15(1):16967. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01056-5.
This study aimed to investigate potential improvements when implementing endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA)-guided personalized embryo transfer (pET) using euploid blastocyst in patients with one or more previous failed embryo transfers. A total of 270 patients with one or more previous failed embryo transfers were enrolled between 2017 and 2021 in this multicenter retrospective study. These patients were divided into two groups: study cases (ERA-guided pET) (n = 200) or controls (standard embryo transfer) (n = 70). Clinical outcomes compared were pregnancy rate (PR), implantation rate (IR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), and live birth rate (LBR). Clinical results in terms of PR, OPR, and LBR were significantly higher when performing ERA-guided pET (PR: 65.0%; OPR: 49.0%; LBR: 48.2%) compared to standard embryo transfer (PR: 37.1%; OPR: 27.1%; LBR: 26.1%) (P < 0.01). Logistic regression was applied to examine the correlation between ERA and the primary outcome measured, OPR, including demographic variables as covariates. The effect of ERA was significantly associated with OPR (P = 0.002; aOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5-5.5); furthermore, OPR decreased significantly when body mass index (BMI) values increased (P = 0.04; aOR 0.9, 95% CI 0.8-0.98). These findings support the potential of ERA-guided pET to improve clinical outcomes and address the challenges encountered by patients with previous implantation failures.
本研究旨在调查在先前有一次或多次胚胎移植失败的患者中,使用整倍体囊胚进行子宫内膜容受性分析(ERA)引导的个性化胚胎移植(pET)时可能带来的改善。在2017年至2021年期间,共有270例先前有一次或多次胚胎移植失败的患者被纳入这项多中心回顾性研究。这些患者被分为两组:研究组(ERA引导的pET)(n = 200)和对照组(标准胚胎移植)(n = 70)。比较的临床结局包括妊娠率(PR)、着床率(IR)、持续妊娠率(OPR)和活产率(LBR)。与标准胚胎移植相比,进行ERA引导的pET时,PR、OPR和LBR方面的临床结果显著更高(PR:65.0%;OPR:49.0%;LBR:48.2%),而标准胚胎移植的PR为37.1%,OPR为27.1%,LBR为26.1%(P < 0.01)。应用逻辑回归分析来检验ERA与所测量的主要结局OPR之间的相关性,将人口统计学变量作为协变量。ERA的效果与OPR显著相关(P = 0.002;调整后比值比[aOR]为2.8,95%可信区间[CI]为1.5 - 5.5);此外,当体重指数(BMI)值增加时,OPR显著降低(P = 0.04;aOR为0.9,95% CI为0.8 - 0.98)。这些发现支持了ERA引导的pET在改善临床结局以及解决先前着床失败患者所面临挑战方面的潜力。