Vaz Ferreira Ana, Delaye Matthieu, Pages Arnaud, Hollebecque Antoine, Gazzah Anas, Bahleda Rastio, Michot Jean-Marie, Danlos Francois-Xavier, Seknazi Lauren, Goldschmidt Vincent, Hénon Clémence, Sakkal Madonna, Smolenschi Cristina, Champiat Stéphane, Marabelle Aurelien, Loriot Yohann, Nagera Lazarovici Céline, Ap-Thomas Zoé, Beraud Chaullet Geoffroy, Ponce Aix Santiago, Massard Christophe, Ouali Kaissa, Frelaut Maxime, Baldini Capucine
Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Espirito Santo, Évora, Portugal.
Drugs Aging. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s40266-025-01212-6.
Data on the use of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in older patients are scarce.
The objective was to study the safety and efficacy of ADCs used in early phase clinical trials in patients aged ≥ 65 years compared with younger patients.
All patients enrolled in early phase clinical trials (phase I or II) of ADCs for solid tumors in our institution between November 2014 and May 2023 were included in this retrospective monocentric study. Safety and efficacy were compared between patients ≥ 65 and < 65 years old (y.o).
A total of 136 patients were included in our study, with 43 (31.6%) patients aged ≥ 65 y.o. In comparison with the younger population, patients aged 65 years or older had similar demographic characteristics. Older patients experienced the same rate of all-grade adverse events (95.3 versus 97.8%) and all-grade related adverse events (65.1 versus 66.7%) but more high-grade adverse events (41.9 versus 30.1%) than younger patients. In the univariate analysis, we identified age, taken as a continuous variable, as associated with high-grade adverse event (p = 0.047). No statistically significant difference was found between older and younger patients in terms of disease control rate (65 versus 54%), median progression-free survival (2.76 months [95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.64-3.75] compared with 2.56 [95% CI 1.81-2.79], p = 0.34), or median overall survival (6.57 months [95% CI 4.01-13.01] compared to 7.89 [95% CI 6.83-9.36], p = 0.65).
In our cohort, ADC therapy provided comparable survival benefits for the older patients but with a higher risk of high-grade adverse event.
关于老年患者使用抗体药物偶联物(ADC)的数据稀少。
本研究旨在比较≥65岁患者与年轻患者在早期临床试验中使用ADC的安全性和有效性。
本回顾性单中心研究纳入了2014年11月至2023年5月期间在我院参加实体瘤ADC早期临床试验(I期或II期)的所有患者。比较了年龄≥65岁和<65岁患者的安全性和有效性。
本研究共纳入136例患者,其中43例(31.6%)年龄≥65岁。与年轻人群相比,65岁及以上患者的人口统计学特征相似。老年患者的所有级别的不良事件发生率(95.3%对97.8%)和所有级别的相关不良事件发生率(65.1%对66.7%)与年轻患者相同,但高级别不良事件发生率高于年轻患者(41.9%对30.1%)。在单因素分析中,我们将年龄作为连续变量,发现其与高级别不良事件相关(p = 0.047)。在疾病控制率(65%对54%)、无进展生存期(2.76个月[95%置信区间,95%CI 1.64 - 3.75]与2.56[95%CI 1.81 - 2.79],p = 0.34)或总生存期(6.57个月[95%CI 4.01 - 13.01]与7.89[95%CI 6.83 - 9.36],p = 0.65)方面,老年患者和年轻患者之间未发现统计学显著差异。
在我们的队列中,ADC治疗为老年患者提供了相当的生存益处,但高级别不良事件风险较高。