Chau Vinh Ngoc, Dang Viet Quoc, Kawai Kenji
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Faculty of Infrastructural Engineering-Technology, Mientrung University of Civil Engineering (MUCE), Tuy Hoa City, Phu Yen Province, Vietnam.
Sci Prog. 2025 Apr-Jun;108(2):368504251341950. doi: 10.1177/00368504251341950. Epub 2025 May 16.
This study investigated the impact of sulfate-resistant mineral admixture (SP2) and untreated sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA) as a partial substitute for cement on the physico-mechanical properties and microstructure of Portland cement concrete. Four concrete mixtures were prepared for the investigation including a control mixture, SP2 mixture (4.7% SP2), SCBA mixture (5% SCBA), and SP2-SCBA mixture (4.7% SP2 and 5% SCBA). The SP2 mixture exhibited superior performance across all assessed engineering properties in comparison to the other mixtures. Moreover, a comparative analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of untreated SCBA used in this study versus processed SCBA from recent research. Remarkably, untreated SCBA, despite having minimal impact on compressive strength, it demonstrated notable improvements in tensile strength. When combined with 4.7% SP2, the untreated SCBA mixture achieved a remarkable 37.9% increase in splitting tensile strength compared to the control mixture, outperforming similar mixtures using processed SCBA and silica fume in previous studies. Microstructure analysis revealed a large amount of spongy, fibrous hydrated structures in both the SCBA and SP2-SCBA mixtures. These structures provide a rational explanation to the increase in splitting tensile strength of the concrete containing SCBA. The findings highlight the tradeoff between using untreated SCBA and treated SCBA as sustainable cement replacements. Although untreated SCBA can only be used at a low replacement level, it offers unique engineering benefits alongside significant energy savings.
本研究调查了抗硫酸盐矿物掺合料(SP2)和未处理的甘蔗渣灰(SCBA)作为水泥部分替代品对波特兰水泥混凝土物理力学性能和微观结构的影响。制备了四种混凝土混合物用于研究,包括一种对照混合物、SP2混合物(4.7% SP2)、SCBA混合物(5% SCBA)以及SP2 - SCBA混合物(4.7% SP2和5% SCBA)。与其他混合物相比,SP2混合物在所有评估的工程性能方面均表现出优异性能。此外,还进行了对比分析,以评估本研究中使用的未处理SCBA与近期研究中处理后的SCBA的性能。值得注意的是,未处理的SCBA尽管对抗压强度影响极小,但在抗拉强度方面有显著提高。与4.7% SP2混合时,未处理的SCBA混合物与对照混合物相比,劈裂抗拉强度显著提高了37.9%,优于先前研究中使用处理后的SCBA和硅灰的类似混合物。微观结构分析表明,SCBA和SP2 - SCBA混合物中均存在大量海绵状、纤维状的水化结构。这些结构为含SCBA混凝土劈裂抗拉强度的提高提供了合理的解释。研究结果突出了使用未处理的SCBA和处理后的SCBA作为可持续水泥替代品之间的权衡。虽然未处理的SCBA只能在低替代水平下使用,但它在提供独特工程效益的同时还能显著节省能源。