• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

含有抗硫酸盐矿物掺和料和甘蔗渣灰的波特兰水泥混凝土的力学性能、吸附特性及微观结构。

Mechanical properties, sorption characteristics, and microstructure of Portland cement concrete containing sulfate-resistant mineral admixture and sugarcane bagasse ash.

作者信息

Chau Vinh Ngoc, Dang Viet Quoc, Kawai Kenji

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Faculty of Infrastructural Engineering-Technology, Mientrung University of Civil Engineering (MUCE), Tuy Hoa City, Phu Yen Province, Vietnam.

出版信息

Sci Prog. 2025 Apr-Jun;108(2):368504251341950. doi: 10.1177/00368504251341950. Epub 2025 May 16.

DOI:10.1177/00368504251341950
PMID:40375754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12084715/
Abstract

This study investigated the impact of sulfate-resistant mineral admixture (SP2) and untreated sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA) as a partial substitute for cement on the physico-mechanical properties and microstructure of Portland cement concrete. Four concrete mixtures were prepared for the investigation including a control mixture, SP2 mixture (4.7% SP2), SCBA mixture (5% SCBA), and SP2-SCBA mixture (4.7% SP2 and 5% SCBA). The SP2 mixture exhibited superior performance across all assessed engineering properties in comparison to the other mixtures. Moreover, a comparative analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of untreated SCBA used in this study versus processed SCBA from recent research. Remarkably, untreated SCBA, despite having minimal impact on compressive strength, it demonstrated notable improvements in tensile strength. When combined with 4.7% SP2, the untreated SCBA mixture achieved a remarkable 37.9% increase in splitting tensile strength compared to the control mixture, outperforming similar mixtures using processed SCBA and silica fume in previous studies. Microstructure analysis revealed a large amount of spongy, fibrous hydrated structures in both the SCBA and SP2-SCBA mixtures. These structures provide a rational explanation to the increase in splitting tensile strength of the concrete containing SCBA. The findings highlight the tradeoff between using untreated SCBA and treated SCBA as sustainable cement replacements. Although untreated SCBA can only be used at a low replacement level, it offers unique engineering benefits alongside significant energy savings.

摘要

本研究调查了抗硫酸盐矿物掺合料(SP2)和未处理的甘蔗渣灰(SCBA)作为水泥部分替代品对波特兰水泥混凝土物理力学性能和微观结构的影响。制备了四种混凝土混合物用于研究,包括一种对照混合物、SP2混合物(4.7% SP2)、SCBA混合物(5% SCBA)以及SP2 - SCBA混合物(4.7% SP2和5% SCBA)。与其他混合物相比,SP2混合物在所有评估的工程性能方面均表现出优异性能。此外,还进行了对比分析,以评估本研究中使用的未处理SCBA与近期研究中处理后的SCBA的性能。值得注意的是,未处理的SCBA尽管对抗压强度影响极小,但在抗拉强度方面有显著提高。与4.7% SP2混合时,未处理的SCBA混合物与对照混合物相比,劈裂抗拉强度显著提高了37.9%,优于先前研究中使用处理后的SCBA和硅灰的类似混合物。微观结构分析表明,SCBA和SP2 - SCBA混合物中均存在大量海绵状、纤维状的水化结构。这些结构为含SCBA混凝土劈裂抗拉强度的提高提供了合理的解释。研究结果突出了使用未处理的SCBA和处理后的SCBA作为可持续水泥替代品之间的权衡。虽然未处理的SCBA只能在低替代水平下使用,但它在提供独特工程效益的同时还能显著节省能源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/0902b1f74a00/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/5df6f15b5447/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/89f666547017/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/22cdc580561c/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/d1e57e05bd65/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/e95302c4ab3e/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/3e01ffa63dd3/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/ab8b88062722/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/546c25f7ee59/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/203efa10b6a5/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/f1e2d6c20142/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/25900ade56c2/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/08c16cf02684/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/d03b56d0fc18/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/0902b1f74a00/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/5df6f15b5447/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/89f666547017/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/22cdc580561c/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/d1e57e05bd65/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/e95302c4ab3e/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/3e01ffa63dd3/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/ab8b88062722/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/546c25f7ee59/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/203efa10b6a5/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/f1e2d6c20142/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/25900ade56c2/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/08c16cf02684/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/d03b56d0fc18/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa80/12084715/0902b1f74a00/10.1177_00368504251341950-fig15.jpg

相似文献

1
Mechanical properties, sorption characteristics, and microstructure of Portland cement concrete containing sulfate-resistant mineral admixture and sugarcane bagasse ash.含有抗硫酸盐矿物掺和料和甘蔗渣灰的波特兰水泥混凝土的力学性能、吸附特性及微观结构。
Sci Prog. 2025 Apr-Jun;108(2):368504251341950. doi: 10.1177/00368504251341950. Epub 2025 May 16.
2
Influence of Sugarcane Bagasse Ash and Silica Fume on the Mechanical and Durability Properties of Concrete.甘蔗渣灰和硅灰对混凝土力学性能及耐久性的影响
Materials (Basel). 2022 Apr 21;15(9):3018. doi: 10.3390/ma15093018.
3
Use of waste recycling coal bottom ash and sugarcane bagasse ash as cement and sand replacement material to produce sustainable concrete.利用废煤底灰和甘蔗渣灰替代水泥和砂生产可持续混凝土。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(35):52399-52411. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19478-3. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
4
Evaluating the suitability of incorporating sugarcane bagasse ash, polypropylene fibers, and sea sand-seawater in enhancing physico-mechanical properties of lightweight foamed concrete.评估掺入甘蔗渣灰、聚丙烯纤维和海砂-海水对提高轻质泡沫混凝土物理力学性能的适用性。
Sci Prog. 2024 Oct-Dec;107(4):368504241306144. doi: 10.1177/00368504241306144.
5
Experimental Investigation of NaOH and KOH Mixture in SCBA-Based Geopolymer Cement Composite.基于自给式呼吸器的地质聚合物水泥复合材料中氢氧化钠和氢氧化钾混合物的实验研究
Materials (Basel). 2020 Aug 4;13(15):3437. doi: 10.3390/ma13153437.
6
Evaluating the combined effect of sugarcane bagasse ash, metakaolin, and polypropylene fibers in sustainable construction.评估甘蔗渣灰、偏高岭土和聚丙烯纤维在可持续建筑中的综合效果。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 30;14(1):26109. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76360-7.
7
Short-term analysis on the combined use of sugarcane bagasse ash and rice husk ash as supplementary cementitious material in concrete production.甘蔗渣灰和稻壳灰在混凝土生产中作为掺合料的短期分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(3):3555-3564. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15877-0. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
8
Experimental study on fresh, mechanical properties and embodied carbon of concrete blended with sugarcane bagasse ash, metakaolin, and millet husk ash as ternary cementitious material.利用甘蔗渣灰、偏高岭土和小米糠灰作为三元胶凝材料的混凝土的新鲜性能、力学性能和隐含碳的实验研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(4):5224-5239. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15954-4. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
9
Explainable artificial intelligence-based compressive strength optimization and Life-Cycle Assessment of eco-friendly sugarcane bagasse ash concrete.基于可解释人工智能的生态友好型甘蔗渣灰混凝土抗压强度优化及生命周期评估
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Mar;32(11):6922-6947. doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-36148-2. Epub 2025 Mar 1.
10
Mechanical and physical characteristics of concrete mixed with sugarcane bagasse ash and recycled polyethylene terephthalate.掺甘蔗渣灰和回收聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯的混凝土的力学和物理特性
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 18;10(18):e38065. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38065. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the suitability of incorporating sugarcane bagasse ash, polypropylene fibers, and sea sand-seawater in enhancing physico-mechanical properties of lightweight foamed concrete.评估掺入甘蔗渣灰、聚丙烯纤维和海砂-海水对提高轻质泡沫混凝土物理力学性能的适用性。
Sci Prog. 2024 Oct-Dec;107(4):368504241306144. doi: 10.1177/00368504241306144.
2
Mechanical and physical characteristics of concrete mixed with sugarcane bagasse ash and recycled polyethylene terephthalate.掺甘蔗渣灰和回收聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯的混凝土的力学和物理特性
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 18;10(18):e38065. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38065. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
3
Influence of Sugarcane Bagasse Ash and Silica Fume on the Mechanical and Durability Properties of Concrete.
甘蔗渣灰和硅灰对混凝土力学性能及耐久性的影响
Materials (Basel). 2022 Apr 21;15(9):3018. doi: 10.3390/ma15093018.
4
Mechanical and microstructural performance of concrete containing high-volume of bagasse ash and silica fume.含大量蔗渣灰和硅灰的混凝土的力学及微观结构性能
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 6;12(1):5719. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08749-1.
5
Characteristics and Applications of Sugar Cane Bagasse Ash Waste in Cementitious Materials.甘蔗渣灰废料在胶凝材料中的特性及应用
Materials (Basel). 2018 Dec 22;12(1):39. doi: 10.3390/ma12010039.
6
Use of Brazilian sugarcane bagasse ash in concrete as sand replacement.利用巴西甘蔗渣灰替代混凝土中的沙子。
Waste Manag. 2010 Jun;30(6):1114-22. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.026. Epub 2010 Feb 18.