• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国按出生队列对乙型肝炎病毒感染进行序贯筛查策略的成本效益分析

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sequential Screening Strategies for Hepatitis B Virus Infection by Birth Cohort - China.

作者信息

Wang Lei, Zheng Hui, Xia Lanfang, Zhang Guomin, Wang Fuzhen, Yin Zundong, Wang Huaqing

机构信息

National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases (NITFID), National Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.

出版信息

China CDC Wkly. 2025 Apr 25;7(17):586-591. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2025.096.

DOI:10.46234/ccdcw2025.096
PMID:40376255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12075484/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Eliminating hepatitis B virus (HBV) as a major public health threat is a global health priority that requires cost-effective screening strategies. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of sequential birth cohort HBV screening strategies in China.

METHODS

Using a Markov model, we compared five screening strategies with current practice, calculating HBV-related deaths averted, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

The sequential birth cohort screening strategy (Sequential Screening 1: screening the 1991-2000 cohort in 2025-2026, the 1971-1990 cohort in 2027-2028, and the 1951-1970 cohort in 2029-2030) was the most cost-effective, with an ICER of 58,523 Chinese Yuan (CNY) per QALY at a willingness-to-pay threshold of three times the per-capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP). An alternative strategy that prioritized the 1951-1970 cohort in 2025-2026 averted the most HBV-related deaths (approximately 3.44 million) and gained 24.9 million QALYs, with an ICER of 60,113 CNY per QALY, also showing cost-effectiveness.

DISCUSSION

Our findings support sequential birth cohort screening as an optimal and innovative approach to achieving the WHO HBV elimination targets, offering evidence-informed guidance for policymakers to optimize screening programs and resource allocation.

摘要

引言

消除乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)这一重大公共卫生威胁是一项全球卫生重点工作,需要具备成本效益的筛查策略。本研究评估了中国按出生队列顺序进行HBV筛查策略的成本效益。

方法

我们使用马尔可夫模型,将五种筛查策略与当前做法进行比较,计算避免的HBV相关死亡人数、获得的质量调整生命年(QALY)以及增量成本效益比(ICER)。进行了单向确定性和概率敏感性分析,以评估结果的稳健性。

结果

按出生队列顺序进行筛查的策略(顺序筛查1:在2025 - 2026年筛查1991 - 2000年出生队列,在2027 - 2028年筛查1971 - 1990年出生队列,在2029 - 2030年筛查1951 - 1970年出生队列)是最具成本效益的,在支付意愿阈值为人均国内生产总值(GDP)三倍的情况下,每QALY的ICER为58,523元人民币(CNY)。另一种在2025 - 2026年优先筛查1951 - 1970年出生队列的策略避免了最多的HBV相关死亡(约344万),并获得了2490万个QALY,每QALY的ICER为60,113元人民币,也显示出成本效益。

讨论

我们的研究结果支持按出生队列顺序进行筛查,这是实现世界卫生组织HBV消除目标的一种最佳且创新的方法,为政策制定者优化筛查计划和资源分配提供了基于证据的指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51f9/12075484/1c58914eb0d3/ccdcw-7-17-586-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51f9/12075484/c3d187e47611/ccdcw-7-17-586-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51f9/12075484/86ef49644d34/ccdcw-7-17-586-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51f9/12075484/1c58914eb0d3/ccdcw-7-17-586-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51f9/12075484/c3d187e47611/ccdcw-7-17-586-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51f9/12075484/86ef49644d34/ccdcw-7-17-586-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51f9/12075484/1c58914eb0d3/ccdcw-7-17-586-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sequential Screening Strategies for Hepatitis B Virus Infection by Birth Cohort - China.中国按出生队列对乙型肝炎病毒感染进行序贯筛查策略的成本效益分析
China CDC Wkly. 2025 Apr 25;7(17):586-591. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2025.096.
2
Cost-effectiveness of universal screening for chronic hepatitis B virus infection in China: an economic evaluation.中国慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染的普遍筛查的成本效益:经济评估。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Feb;10(2):e278-e287. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00517-9.
3
Cost-effectiveness of couple-based immunization strategy to prevent mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus in China: A decision-analytic Markov model.中国基于夫妇的免疫策略预防乙型肝炎病毒母婴传播的成本效益:一项决策分析马尔可夫模型
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Feb 4;19:100264. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100264. eCollection 2020 Feb.
4
Treat All versus targeted strategies to select HBV-infected people for antiviral therapy in The Gambia, west Africa: a cost-effectiveness analysis.在西非冈比亚,对 HBV 感染者进行抗病毒治疗的全人群策略与靶向策略的成本效益分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2024 Jan;12(1):e66-e78. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00467-9.
5
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
6
Cost-effectiveness of community-based screening and treatment for chronic hepatitis B in The Gambia: an economic modelling analysis.冈比亚基于社区的慢性乙型肝炎筛查和治疗的成本效益:经济建模分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Aug;4(8):e568-78. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30101-2.
7
Decision tree-Markov model of perinatal depression screening: a cost-utility analysis.决策树-马尔可夫模型在围生期抑郁筛查中的应用:成本效用分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 20;12:1308867. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1308867. eCollection 2024.
8
Cost-effectiveness of a population-based AAA screening program for men over 65 years old in Iran.伊朗针对65岁以上男性的基于人群的腹主动脉瘤筛查项目的成本效益。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 May 13;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00283-7.
9
The cost-effectiveness of universal hepatitis B screening for reaching WHO diagnosis targets in Australia by 2030.到2030年在澳大利亚进行普遍乙肝筛查以实现世界卫生组织诊断目标的成本效益。
Med J Aust. 2023 Mar 6;218(4):168-173. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51825. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
10
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hepatitis E Vaccination Strategies for Swine Workers.养猪工人戊型肝炎疫苗接种策略的成本效益分析
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2025 Mar 10;2025:9371055. doi: 10.1155/tbed/9371055. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
New progress in HBV control and the cascade of health care for people living with HBV in China: evidence from the fourth national serological survey, 2020.中国乙肝控制新进展及乙肝感染者医疗保健级联服务:来自2020年第四次全国血清学调查的证据
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 Sep 14;51:101193. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101193. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Understanding modelled economic evaluations: a reader's guide for clinicians.理解模型化经济评估:临床医生阅读指南
Med J Aust. 2024 Sep 16;221(6):302-307. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52409. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
3
Progress towards elimination of viral hepatitis: a Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology Commission update.
消除病毒性肝炎的进展:《柳叶刀·胃肠病学和肝病学》委员会最新报告
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Apr;9(4):346-365. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00321-7. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
4
Evidence for Benefits of Early Treatment Initiation for Chronic Hepatitis B.早期治疗慢性乙型肝炎的益处证据。
Viruses. 2023 Apr 18;15(4):997. doi: 10.3390/v15040997.
5
Universal testing for hepatitis B must be accompanied by better linkage with care.乙型肝炎的普遍检测必须与更好的医疗服务衔接相结合。
Med J Aust. 2023 Mar 6;218(4):165-166. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51848. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
6
Cost-effectiveness of universal screening for chronic hepatitis B virus infection in China: an economic evaluation.中国慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染的普遍筛查的成本效益:经济评估。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Feb;10(2):e278-e287. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00517-9.
7
Cost-effectiveness of Hepatitis B Virus Infection Screening and Treatment or Vaccination in 6 High-risk Populations in the United States.美国6种高危人群中乙型肝炎病毒感染筛查、治疗或疫苗接种的成本效益
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Dec 26;6(1):ofy353. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy353. eCollection 2019 Jan.
8
Thresholds for the cost-effectiveness of interventions: alternative approaches.干预措施成本效益的阈值:替代方法
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Feb 1;93(2):118-24. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.138206. Epub 2014 Dec 15.