Neeman Binyamin B, Kocherov Stanislav, Jaber Jawdat, Neheman Amos, Chertin Boris
Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Faculty of Medical Science, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Department of Urology, Shamir Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Curr Urol. 2025 May;19(3):173-176. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000174. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
The main goal of managing an obstructed megaureter (OMU) is to preserve the function of the affected kidney. To preserve the upper urinary tract, end cutaneous ureterostomy (ECU) seems to be a promising temporizing option. We aimed to evaluate our experience with ECU in patients with primary and secondary OMU and to demonstrate an efficacy of robot-assisted laparoscopic takedown ureterostomy and subsequent extravesical ureteric reimplantation.
Retrospective analysis of patients that underwent ECU due to primary or secondary megaureter between 2003 and 2020. Nineteen patients (12 males, 7 females) with a mean age of 4.2 ± 3.5 months (mean ± standard deviation) underwent ECU of 27 renal units. Of those, 11 (57.9%) had primary OMU and 8 (42.1%) had secondary OMU. Undiversion was performed in 16 (84%) out of 19 patients (20 renal units out of 27 [74%]).
In the vast majority of the cases, we have observed improvement in the hydronephrosis and renal function after ureterostomy. After reimplantation ultrasonography showed either stable or further improvement in hydronephrosis in 80% of patients. Robot-assisted laparoscopic patients had shorter admission period and indwelling catheter time after the surgery.
End cutaneous ureterostomy is a safe and effective temporary procedure for the treatment of progressive primary and secondary megaureters. Robot-assisted laparoscopic takedown of ureterostomy with subsequent reimplantation seems to be a good alternative for undiversion and subsequent reimplantation in these patients.
处理梗阻性巨输尿管(OMU)的主要目标是保留患肾的功能。为了保留上尿路,经皮输尿管造口术(ECU)似乎是一种有前景的临时选择。我们旨在评估我们在原发性和继发性OMU患者中应用ECU的经验,并证明机器人辅助腹腔镜输尿管造口拆除术及随后的膀胱外输尿管再植术的有效性。
对2003年至2020年间因原发性或继发性巨输尿管而接受ECU的患者进行回顾性分析。19例患者(12例男性,7例女性),平均年龄4.2±3.5个月(平均值±标准差),对27个肾单位进行了ECU。其中,11例(57.9%)为原发性OMU,8例(42.1%)为继发性OMU。19例患者中有16例(84%)(27个肾单位中的20个[74%])进行了去转流术。
在绝大多数病例中,我们观察到输尿管造口术后肾积水和肾功能有所改善。再植术后超声检查显示,80%的患者肾积水稳定或进一步改善。机器人辅助腹腔镜手术患者术后住院时间和留置导尿管时间较短。
经皮输尿管造口术是治疗进展性原发性和继发性巨输尿管的一种安全有效的临时手术。机器人辅助腹腔镜输尿管造口拆除术及随后的再植术似乎是这些患者去转流术及随后再植术的一个良好替代方案。