Suppr超能文献

两种牙槽嵴顶窦底提升技术的临床和影像学评估:骨凿法与骨致密化法。一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Clinical and radiographic evaluation for two crestal sinus lift techniques: osteotome versus osseodensification. a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Cobo-Vázquez Carlos Manuel, García-Rodríguez Sonia, Colmenares-Otero María Eugenia, Sáez-Alcaide Luis Miguel, Cortés-Bretón-Brinkmann Jorge, Madrigal Martínez-Pereda Cristina, Meniz-Garcia Cristina

机构信息

Department of Clinical Specialities. Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Plaza Ramón y Cajal, 3, 28040, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Implant Dent. 2025 May 16;11(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40729-025-00615-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Maxillary sinus floor elevation is a safe and effective surgical technique for achieving vertical bone height, performed through either a lateral or crestal approach. The latter includes both the osteotome technique and osseodensification. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the outcomes of the classic crestal sinus lift technique and the osseodensification sinus lift approach in terms of the bone gain, marginal bone loss, survival rate, follow-up time and complications.

METHODS

This review was performed following PRISMA guidelines. An electronic search was conducted across three databases: (1) The National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed); (2) SCOPUS; and (3) Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and the Cochrane Collaboration tool for evaluating risk of bias. A meta-analysis for random effects was carried out for implant survival, residual bone height and bone gain.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included, ten studies performed the osteotome (OST) approach and three performed the osseodensification (OD) approach, with a total of 519 sites treated. The residual bone height was 5.94 and 5.00 mm for OD and OST, respectively. For bone gain, similar results were found for both groups, being 3.37 mm for OD and 3.18 mm for OST. For both groups, the most used diameter and length of the implant was 4 and 10 mm, respectively, and the implant survival rates ranged from 94.1% to 100%. OST technique reflected a complication rate of 14.32%, compared to the OD technique, which showed a complication rate of 2.78%.

CONCLUSIONS

It can be concluded that the maxillary sinus lift by osseodesinfication approach is a safe, predictable and successful technique compared to the osteotome approach, with similar outcomes regarding bone gain which is an important parameter for implant placement.

摘要

目的

上颌窦底提升术是一种用于增加垂直骨高度的安全有效的手术技术,可通过外侧或牙槽嵴顶入路进行。后者包括骨凿技术和骨致密化技术。本系统评价的目的是比较经典牙槽嵴顶窦底提升技术和骨致密化窦底提升技术在骨增量、边缘骨丢失、存留率、随访时间和并发症方面的结果。

方法

本评价按照PRISMA指南进行。通过三个数据库进行电子检索:(1)美国国立医学图书馆(MEDLINE/PubMed);(2)Scopus;(3)Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表和Cochrane协作网偏倚风险评估工具。对种植体存留率、剩余骨高度和骨增量进行随机效应荟萃分析。

结果

共纳入13项研究,其中10项研究采用骨凿(OST)入路,3项研究采用骨致密化(OD)入路,共治疗519个位点。OD组和OST组的剩余骨高度分别为5.94 mm和5.00 mm。在骨增量方面,两组结果相似,OD组为3.37 mm,OST组为3.18 mm。两组最常用的种植体直径和长度分别为4 mm和10 mm,种植体存留率在94.1%至100%之间。OST技术的并发症发生率为14.32%,而OD技术的并发症发生率为2.78%。

结论

可以得出结论,与骨凿技术相比,骨致密化上颌窦提升术是一种安全、可预测且成功的技术,在骨增量方面结果相似,而骨增量是种植体植入的一个重要参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ab/12084192/828393a7c886/40729_2025_615_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验