Singh N N, Winton A S, Singh J
Appl Res Ment Retard. 1985;6(3):283-93. doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(85)90002-5.
The impact of two variations of teacher attention to oral reading errors and a no-treatment control condition were compared in an alternating treatments design. For four moderately mentally retarded children, each uncorrected oral reading error was followed by: (a) immediate teacher attention, with the teacher correcting the error word as soon as it occurred, (b) delayed teacher attention, with the teacher correcting the error word at the end of the sentence in which it occurred or within 10 to 15 seconds if the subject paused following an error, or (c) no teacher attention. Both immediate and delayed teacher attention were effective in reducing the number of uncorrected oral reading errors and increasing the number of self-corrections when compared to the no-treatment control. However, the delayed condition had greater effect than the immediate condition on both measures. In a later remediation phase, when only the delayed treatment was given, uncorrected errors remained at low levels whereas self-corrections generally increased. Total errors, whether subsequently self-corrected or not, with one exception, decreased during the study.
在交替治疗设计中,比较了教师对口头阅读错误的两种不同关注方式以及无治疗对照条件的影响。对于四名中度智力障碍儿童,每次未纠正的口头阅读错误之后会出现以下情况:(a) 教师立即关注,错误单词一出现教师就进行纠正;(b) 教师延迟关注,在错误单词所在句子结束时或如果受试者在错误后停顿,则在10至15秒内纠正错误单词;或者 (c) 教师不关注。与无治疗对照相比,教师立即关注和延迟关注在减少未纠正的口头阅读错误数量和增加自我纠正数量方面均有效。然而,在这两项指标上,延迟条件比立即条件的效果更大。在随后的补救阶段,仅给予延迟治疗时,未纠正的错误保持在低水平,而自我纠正通常会增加。在研究期间,除一个例外,无论随后是否自我纠正,总错误数都有所减少。