Werner Rachel M, Kim Seiyoun, Konetzka R Tamara
Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2510933. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.10933.
IMPORTANCE: A growing number of people with dementia are opting to live at home and receive care in the community rather than enter a nursing home. Adequately supporting their care at home can be challenging, and Medicare-funded home health care is one common source of care. OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in the use of home-based care among traditional Medicare beneficiaries with dementia compared with those without dementia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional study of home health care use from January 1, 2010, to June 30, 2022, was conducted among 13 604 086 traditional Medicare beneficiaries aged 68 years or older who were receiving home health care during the study period. Statistical analysis took place from February 2024 to March 2025. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Receipt of Medicare-funded home health care, as home health "spells" (the initial Medicare-certified home health episode and all subsequent recertifications were considered 1 home health spell for analysis). RESULTS: Among the 13 604 086 traditional Medicare beneficiaries included in the study (mean [SD] age, 79.4 [7.7] years; 60.4% women), 27.7% had a diagnosis of dementia. Compared with beneficiaries using home health care without a diagnosis of dementia, those with a diagnosis of dementia were older (mean [SD] age, 82.2 [7.5] vs 78.4 [7.5] years), and a higher percentage were female (61.9% vs 59.9%) and dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid (17.0% vs 11.1%). There were 30 549 666 new home health spells during the study. Individuals with dementia more commonly used community-initiated home health care than postacute care (53.8% vs 46.2%). Among individuals with a diagnosis of dementia, the initiation of home health spells increased between 2010 and 2019 by 16.8% (from 35.4 to 40.2 spells per 1000 beneficiaries) for community-initiated care and by 21.4% (from 28.9 to 35.1 spells per 1000 beneficiaries) for postacute care. Between 2020 and 2022, home health care use decreased among individuals with dementia; community-initiated spells decreased from 40.2 to 33.6 spells per 1000 beneficiaries, and postacute spells decreased from 35.1 to 28.5 spells per 1000 beneficiaries. In comparison, home health use among individuals without a diagnosis of dementia was relatively low and gradually decreased over the study period: between 2010 and 2019, home health spells decreased by 20.1% (from 8.9 to 7.1 spells per 1000 beneficiaries) for community-initiated care and by 20.7% (from 12.8 to 10.1 spells per 1000 beneficiaries) for postacute care. Home health spells were longer for people with dementia compared with people without dementia (community-initiated care: median, 47 days [IQR, 27-80 days] to 52 days [IQR, 29-89 days] vs 44 days [IQR, 25-76 days] to 50 days [IQR, 27-91 days]; postacute care: median, 40 days [IQR, 23-59 days] to 43 days [IQR, 25-59 days] vs 32 days [IQR, 19-56 days] to 34 days [IQR, 20-56 days]) and increased after 2020 (community-initiated care: median, 55 days [IQR, 33-111 days] vs 53 days [IQR, 27-98 days]; postacute care: median, 48 days [IQR, 27-59 days] vs 42 days [IQR, 24-58 days]). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that home health use is high and has increased among people with dementia. Decreasing rates of home health use since 2020 in this high-need population suggest a need for ongoing monitoring of service use and outcomes for people with dementia.
重要性:越来越多的痴呆症患者选择居家生活并在社区接受护理,而非进入养老院。在家中为他们提供充分的护理具有挑战性,而医疗保险资助的家庭健康护理是一种常见的护理来源。 目的:比较患有痴呆症的传统医疗保险受益人与未患痴呆症的受益人在使用居家护理方面的趋势。 设计、背景和参与者:对2010年1月1日至2022年6月30日期间接受家庭健康护理的13604086名68岁及以上的传统医疗保险受益人进行了一项关于家庭健康护理使用情况的横断面研究。统计分析于2024年2月至2025年3月进行。 主要结果和指标:接受医疗保险资助的家庭健康护理,以家庭健康“轮次”计算(最初经医疗保险认证的家庭健康护理事件及所有后续重新认证被视为1个家庭健康轮次用于分析)。 结果:在纳入研究的13604086名传统医疗保险受益人中(平均[标准差]年龄为79.4[7.7]岁;60.4%为女性),27.7%被诊断患有痴呆症。与未被诊断患有痴呆症而使用家庭健康护理的受益人相比,被诊断患有痴呆症的受益人年龄更大(平均[标准差]年龄为82.2[7.5]岁对78.4[7.5]岁),女性比例更高(61.9%对59.9%),并且同时符合医疗保险和医疗补助资格的比例更高(17.0%对11.1%)。研究期间共有30549666个新的家庭健康轮次。患有痴呆症的个体比急性后期护理更常使用社区发起的家庭健康护理(53.8%对46.2%)。在被诊断患有痴呆症的个体中,2010年至2019年间,社区发起的护理中家庭健康轮次的启动增加了16.8%(从每1000名受益人35.4次增加到40.2次),急性后期护理中增加了21.4%(从每1000名受益人28.9次增加到35.1次)。2020年至2022年间,患有痴呆症的个体的家庭健康护理使用减少;社区发起的轮次从每1000名受益人40.2次减少到33.6次,急性后期轮次从每1000名受益人35.1次减少到28.5次。相比之下,未被诊断患有痴呆症的个体的家庭健康护理使用相对较低,且在研究期间逐渐减少:2010年至2019年间,社区发起的护理中家庭健康轮次减少了20.1%(从每1000名受益人8.9次减少到7.1次),急性后期护理中减少了20.7%(从每1000名受益人12.8次减少到10.1次)。与未患痴呆症的人相比,患有痴呆症的人的家庭健康轮次更长(社区发起的护理:中位数为47天[四分位间距,27 - 80天]对52天[四分位间距,29 - 89天],而未患痴呆症的人为44天[四分位间距,25 - 76天]对50天[四分位间距,27 - 91天];急性后期护理:中位数为40天[四分位间距,23 - 59天]对43天[四分位间距,25 - 59天],而未患痴呆症的人为32天[四分位间距,19 - 56天]对34天[四分位间距,20 - 56天]),并且在2020年后增加(社区发起的护理:中位数为55天[四分位间距,33 - 111天]对53天[四分位间距,27 - 98天];急性后期护理:中位数为48天[四分位间距,27 - 59天]对42天[四分位间距,24 - 58天])。 结论:本研究表明痴呆症患者的家庭健康护理使用率较高且呈上升趋势。2020年以来这一高需求人群的家庭健康护理使用率下降,提示需要持续监测痴呆症患者的服务使用情况和结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025-5-1
JAMA Netw Open. 2024-11-4
Health Technol Assess. 2001
JAMA Netw Open. 2024-12-2
JAMA Netw Open. 2025-5-1
JAMA Netw Open. 2025-8-1
Am J Health Econ. 2025
Med Care Res Rev. 2025-6
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024-3-1
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020-10