Jursinic P, Dennenberg R
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1985 Sep;241(2):540-9. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(85)90579-x.
The concentration of photosystem II was determined in thylakoids of dwarf peas by the use of the following methods: absorption change at 325 nm; atrazine binding; and flash yields of oxygen evolution (Emerson-Arnold method), of protons from oxidation of water, and of reduction of DCIP. For the first time all of the flash-yield measurements have been done on the same sample and give equivalent values for the concentration of photosystem II. Agreement of the absorption change measurement at 325 nm with the other measurements was accomplished by the introduction of important improvements to the methods of Melis and co-workers [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1980) 77, 4712-4716]. The atrazine-binding method gave photosystem II values that were twice as large as any of the other photosystem II measurements. Possible reasons are discussed for this discrepancy in terms of the secondary acceptor (Q400) of Ikegami and Katoh [Plant Cell Physiol. (1973) 14, 829-836]. The concentration of photosystem I was measured by absorption change at 705 nm. From the concentration values of photosystem II and I the system II/I stoichiometry was calculated.
通过以下方法测定矮生豌豆类囊体中光系统II的浓度:325nm处的吸收变化;莠去津结合;以及氧气释放的闪光产率(爱默生-阿诺德方法)、水氧化产生质子的闪光产率和2,6-二氯靛酚还原的闪光产率。首次对同一样品进行了所有闪光产率测量,并得出了光系统II浓度的等效值。通过对梅利斯及其同事的方法[《美国国家科学院院刊》(1980) 77, 4712-4716]进行重要改进,实现了325nm处吸收变化测量与其他测量结果的一致。莠去津结合法得出的光系统II值是其他任何光系统II测量值的两倍。根据池上和加藤[《植物细胞生理学》(1973) 14, 829-836]的二级受体(Q400)讨论了这种差异的可能原因。通过705nm处的吸收变化测量光系统I的浓度。根据光系统II和I的浓度值计算系统II/I的化学计量比。