Liu Ziwen, Zhang Zepei, Yang Yuming, Meng Lin, Du Juan, Miao Jun
Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Jiefangnanlu 406, Hexi District, Tianjin, China.
Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Comput Biol Med. 2025 Jun;192(Pt B):110344. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110344. Epub 2025 May 15.
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an established surgical method for restoring neurological function and reconstructing cervical curvature. However, a limited number of studies have investigated the biomechanical changes after ACDF involving multiple surgical segments. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of surgical devices, number of surgical segments and motions on the strain and stress distribution of the implants. A validated finite element cervical spine model (C2-C7) was used to develop four postoperative models involving zero-profile (ZP) devices or cage and plate (CP) constructs across two- and three-segment ACDF. We analyzed postoperative range of motion (ROM) and implant strain-stress characteristics. ZP devices yielded higher ROM values on fused segments compared to CP devices. The ZP group exhibited higher maximum strain values and predicted effective strain area (Pesa) on bone graft surfaces compared to the CP group. Similarly, maximum and average stress values were greater in the ZP group, with minimal influence from the number of surgical segments on strain and stress distributions. Two-way ANOVA showed that the type of surgical device significantly affected stress values across multiple moment sizes during extension and flexion, while the number of surgical segments was significant only under specific conditions, such as extension at 1.0 Nm and 1.5 Nm and flexion at 1.5 Nm. Our study found that increasing the number of surgical segments had little impact on implant biomechanics. ZP devices significantly increased strain and stress values on bone grafts, with higher stress and larger Pesa area at the graft-endplate interface, promoting bone growth in fused segments. In contrast, CP devices showed lower stress and strain values, warranting caution in multi-segment surgeries.
颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)是一种用于恢复神经功能和重建颈椎曲度的成熟手术方法。然而,仅有少数研究调查了多节段ACDF术后的生物力学变化。因此,本研究旨在探讨手术器械、手术节段数量和运动对植入物应变和应力分布的影响。使用经过验证的有限元颈椎模型(C2-C7)建立了四个术后模型,涉及两节段和三节段ACDF的零轮廓(ZP)器械或椎间融合器加钢板(CP)结构。我们分析了术后活动范围(ROM)和植入物的应变-应力特征。与CP器械相比,ZP器械在融合节段产生更高的ROM值。与CP组相比,ZP组在植骨表面表现出更高的最大应变值和预测有效应变面积(Pesa)。同样,ZP组的最大应力值和平均应力值更大,手术节段数量对应变和应力分布的影响最小。双向方差分析表明,手术器械类型在伸展和屈曲过程中对多个力矩大小下的应力值有显著影响,而手术节段数量仅在特定条件下有显著影响,如在1.0 Nm和1.5 Nm伸展以及1.5 Nm屈曲时。我们的研究发现,增加手术节段数量对植入物生物力学影响不大。ZP器械显著增加了植骨上的应变和应力值,在植骨-终板界面处应力更高且Pesa面积更大,促进了融合节段的骨生长。相比之下,CP器械显示出较低的应力和应变值,在多节段手术中需谨慎使用。