Jesus Diogo, Matos Ana, Henriques Carla, Doria Andrea, Ines Luis Sousa
Rheumatology Department, Unidade Local de Saude da Regiao de Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilha, Portugal.
Lupus Sci Med. 2025 May 16;12(1):e001499. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2025-001499.
This study aimed to derive and validate a cut-off for severe disease activity (SDA) using the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) and compare its accuracy and impact on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) with the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) and SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K).
We performed a post hoc analysis of pooled placebo arm data from the MUSE (A Phase II, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MEDI-546 in Subjects with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus), TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 (Treatment of Uncontrolled Lupus via the Interferon Pathway) trials, including 438 patients with moderate-to-severe SLE. SLE-DAS was scored retrospectively, and a cut-off for SDA was derived using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves against the BILAG-2004 numerical score >11 as gold standard. Multiple linear regression analysis and Cohen's d effect size were applied to evaluate the effectiveness of SLE-DAS, BILAG-2004 and SLEDAI-2K SDA classifications in capturing HR-QoL patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
The optimal SLE-DAS cut-off for SDA was >9.90 (area under the ROC curve=0.847, sensitivity=77.8%, specificity=79.6%). Patients classified as SDA by both SLE-DAS and BILAG-2004 or only by SLE-DAS exhibited similar disease activity, while those classified by BILAG-2004 alone had less severe disease and better HR-QoL. The SLE-DAS cut-off was associated with worse HR-QoL across multiple PROs more consistently than BILAG-2004 or SLEDAI-2K.
The SLE-DAS cut-off for SDA provides an accurate definition of SDA in SLE, with good discriminative power and consistent associations with worse HR-QoL. This SLE-DAS definition enhances disease activity classification and offers a practical tool for guiding treatment decisions in clinical practice, as well as selecting patients with SDA for inclusion in clinical trials.
本研究旨在使用系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动评分(SLE-DAS)得出并验证重度疾病活动度(SDA)的临界值,并将其准确性以及对健康相关生活质量(HR-QoL)的影响与2004年不列颠群岛狼疮评估组(BILAG-2004)和2000年系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数(SLEDAI-2K)进行比较。
我们对MUSE(一项评估MEDI-546治疗系统性红斑狼疮受试者的疗效和安全性的II期随机研究)、TULIP-1和TULIP-2(通过干扰素途径治疗难治性狼疮)试验中合并的安慰剂组数据进行了事后分析,纳入了438例中重度系统性红斑狼疮患者。对SLE-DAS进行回顾性评分,并以BILAG-2004数值评分>11作为金标准,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线得出SDA的临界值。应用多元线性回归分析和科恩d效应量来评估SLE-DAS、BILAG-2004和SLEDAI-2K的SDA分类在获取HR-QoL患者报告结局(PROs)方面的有效性。
SDA的最佳SLE-DAS临界值>9.90(ROC曲线下面积=0.847,灵敏度=77.8%,特异度=79.6%)。被SLE-DAS和BILAG-2004均分类为SDA或仅被SLE-DAS分类为SDA的患者表现出相似的疾病活动度,而仅被BILAG-2004分类的患者疾病严重程度较低且HR-QoL较好。与BILAG-2004或SLEDAI-2K相比,SLE-DAS临界值在多个PROs方面与较差的HR-QoL的关联更一致。
SDA的SLE-DAS临界值为系统性红斑狼疮中的SDA提供了准确的定义,具有良好的判别能力,且与较差的HR-QoL有一致的关联。这种SLE-DAS定义增强了疾病活动度分类,并为临床实践中的治疗决策提供了实用工具,以及为选择SDA患者纳入临床试验提供了依据。