Rheumatology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
School of Technology and Management, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, Viseu, Portugal.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Mar;78(3):365-371. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214502. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
To derive and validate a new disease activity measure for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS), with improved sensitivity to change as compared with SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), while maintaining high specificity and easiness of use.
We studied 520 patients with SLE from two tertiary care centres (derivation and validation cohorts). At each visit, disease activity was scored using the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and SLEDAI 2000 (SLEDAI-2K). To construct the SLE-DAS, we applied multivariate linear regression analysis in the derivation cohort, with PGA as dependent variable. The formula was validated in a different cohort through the study of: (1) correlations between SLE-DAS, PGA and SLEDAI-2K; (2) performance of SLEDAI-2K and SLE-DAS in identifying a clinically meaningful change in disease activity (ΔPGA≥0.3); and (3) accuracy of SLEDAI-2K and SLE-DAS time-adjusted means in predicting damage accrual.
The final SLE-DAS instrument included 17 items. SLE-DAS was highly correlated with PGA (r=0.875, p<0.0005) and SLEDAI-2K (r=0.943, p<0.0005) in the validation cohort. The optimal discriminative ΔSLE-DAS cut-off to detect a clinically meaningful change was 1.72. In the validation cohort, SLE-DAS showed a higher sensitivity than SLEDAI-2K (change ≥4) to detect a clinically meaningful improvement (89.5% vs 47.4%, p=0.008) or worsening (95.5% vs 59.1%, p=0.008), while maintaining similar specificities. SLE-DAS performed better in predicting damage accrual than SLEDAI-2K.
SLE-DAS has a good construct validity and has better performance than SLEDAI-2K in identifying clinically significant changes in disease activity and in predicting damage accrual.
为系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)开发并验证一种新的疾病活动度衡量指标,即系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动度评分(SLE-DAS),与 SLE 疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)相比,其在改变方面具有更高的敏感性,同时保持高特异性和易用性。
我们研究了来自两个三级保健中心的 520 名 SLE 患者(推导和验证队列)。在每次就诊时,使用医师总体评估(PGA)和 SLEDAI 2000(SLEDAI-2K)对疾病活动进行评分。为了构建 SLE-DAS,我们在推导队列中应用了多元线性回归分析,将 PGA 作为因变量。通过研究以下内容,在不同的队列中验证了该公式:(1)SLE-DAS、PGA 和 SLEDAI-2K 之间的相关性;(2)SLEDAI-2K 和 SLE-DAS 在识别疾病活动的临床显著变化(PGA≥0.3)方面的表现;(3)SLEDAI-2K 和 SLE-DAS 时间调整平均值预测损伤积累的准确性。
最终的 SLE-DAS 工具包含 17 个项目。在验证队列中,SLE-DAS 与 PGA(r=0.875,p<0.0005)和 SLEDAI-2K(r=0.943,p<0.0005)高度相关。检测临床有意义变化的最佳区分 ΔSLE-DAS 截止值为 1.72。在验证队列中,SLE-DAS 比 SLEDAI-2K(变化≥4)更能检测到有临床意义的改善(89.5% vs 47.4%,p=0.008)或恶化(95.5% vs 59.1%,p=0.008),同时保持相似的特异性。SLE-DAS 在预测损伤积累方面的表现优于 SLEDAI-2K。
SLE-DAS 具有良好的结构效度,在识别疾病活动的临床显著变化和预测损伤积累方面,其性能优于 SLEDAI-2K。