Ma Zi-Yi, Yang Zhen, Liu Jia, Peng Xue, Nie Xu-Biao, Qi Pai-Pai, Jiang Quan-Bing, Kok Wei-Hao, Liu En, Fan Chao-Qiang
Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Surg Endosc. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11772-8.
BACKGROUND: Electrocoagulation with an electrosurgical knife is the traditional approach to achieve haemostasis during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), as bleeding may obscure the operative field and increase the risks of muscle injury and perforation. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the sequential injection-electrocoagulation procedure during ESD. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 69 patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal ESD were randomized to either the control group (traditional electrocoagulation) or the experimental group ("Sequential injection-electrocoagulation" method) from September 2023 to June 2024. Two endoscopists scored the visibility of each bleeding point from 1 (undetectable) to 4 (easily detectable). RESULTS: The median time to haemostasis at each bleeding point was 17 (11-23) seconds in the experimental group and 22 (14.5-41) seconds in the control group (P < 0.001). The visibility scores were significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (3.24 ± 0.63 vs. 2.82 ± 0.57) (P < 0.001). Muscle injuries occurred more frequently in the control group (P = 0.003). Unfortunately, there was one case of perforation in the control group caused by haemostasis. CONCLUSION: The sequential injection-electrocoagulation strategy shortened the time to hemostasis during ESD, improved the visibility of bleeding points, and minimized the risks of muscle injury and perforation.
背景:在内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)期间,使用电外科刀进行电凝是实现止血的传统方法,因为出血可能会模糊手术视野,并增加肌肉损伤和穿孔的风险。 目的:本研究旨在评估ESD期间序贯注射-电凝 procedure的疗效和安全性。 方法:在这项随机对照试验中,从2023年9月至2024年6月,69例接受上消化道ESD的患者被随机分为对照组(传统电凝)或实验组(“序贯注射-电凝”方法)。两名内镜医师对每个出血点的可见度从1(不可检测)到4(易于检测)进行评分。 结果:实验组每个出血点的中位止血时间为17(11-23)秒,对照组为22(14.5-41)秒(P < 0.001)。实验组的可见度评分显著高于对照组(3.24±0.63对2.82±0.57)(P < 0.001)。对照组肌肉损伤的发生率更高(P = 0.003)。不幸的是,对照组有1例因止血导致穿孔。 结论:序贯注射-电凝策略缩短了ESD期间的止血时间,提高了出血点的可见度,并将肌肉损伤和穿孔的风险降至最低。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-10-31
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-20
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2024-3
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022-4