Hochwarter Stefan, Gutheil Julian, Stampfer Philip, Truskaller Thomas, Deutsch Markus, Feichtner Franz
Institute for Biomedicine and Health Sciences (HEALTH), Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft m.b.H., Graz, Austria.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2025 May 15;327:308-312. doi: 10.3233/SHTI250334.
This study evaluates the usability of a Therapy and Monitoring System (TMS) designed to enhance interdisciplinary collaboration in acute geriatric wards. Developed through an iterative co-creation process with end-users, TMS integrates features such as profession-specific views, geriatric assessment tools, and electronic health record (EHR) integration. Using the System Usability Scale (SUS), data were collected from 53 participants across three hospitals in Austria, representing professions such as nursing, medicine, psychology, and occupational therapy. The overall mean SUS score was 69.2 (SD 14.5), indicating moderate usability, with notable differences between professions. Nurses and medical doctors reported lower usability scores compared to psychologists and occupational therapists. Qualitative findings highlighted benefits such as improved interdisciplinary collaboration and documentation efficiency, alongside challenges like double documentation and technical limitations. These insights provide a basis for refining TMS to better support multi-professional workflows, with future iterations focusing on addressing integration barriers and user feedback.
本研究评估了一种治疗与监测系统(TMS)的可用性,该系统旨在加强急性老年病房中的跨学科协作。通过与最终用户进行迭代共创过程开发的TMS集成了特定专业视图、老年评估工具和电子健康记录(EHR)集成等功能。使用系统可用性量表(SUS),从奥地利三家医院的53名参与者那里收集了数据,这些参与者代表了护理、医学、心理学和职业治疗等专业。总体平均SUS得分为69.2(标准差14.5),表明可用性中等,不同专业之间存在显著差异。与心理学家和职业治疗师相比,护士和医生报告的可用性得分较低。定性研究结果突出了跨学科协作和文档效率提高等好处,同时也指出了双重文档记录和技术限制等挑战。这些见解为改进TMS以更好地支持多专业工作流程提供了基础,未来的迭代将专注于解决集成障碍和用户反馈。