Suppr超能文献

评估医院电子病历系统的可用性和用户满意度:在瓦尔基里项目背景下对两种可用性工具的比较研究

Evaluating Usability and User Satisfaction in Hospital-Based EHR Systems: A Comparative Study of Two Usability Tools in the Context of the Valkyrie Project.

作者信息

Lintvedt Ove, Nordheim Espen Solbakken, Solvoll Terje Geir, Pedersen Rune

机构信息

Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, Tromsø, Norway.

Nord University, Bodø, Norway.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2025 May 12;326:49-53. doi: 10.3233/SHTI250235.

Abstract

Usability and user satisfaction are critical for Electronic Health Records. This study evaluates DIPS Arena, a hospital-based EHR, and compares the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the National Usability-focused HIS-Scale (NuHISS) in predicting satisfaction. A cross-sectional survey of 127 users across three hospitals collected the SUS, the NuHISS, and satisfaction data. The SUS was a stronger predictor of satisfaction explaining 45% of variance. The SUS scores were higher and more consistent, while the NuHISS provided task-specific insights. The SUS effectively predicts satisfaction, but a combined usability approach is recommended. Interoperability challenges in DIPS Arena impact usability and Valkyrie's Virtual Health Record could enhance data integration. Future research should refine usability frameworks with subjective and objective measures.

摘要

可用性和用户满意度对于电子健康记录至关重要。本研究评估了基于医院的电子健康记录系统DIPS Arena,并比较了系统可用性量表(SUS)和以可用性为重点的国家医院信息系统量表(NuHISS)在预测满意度方面的表现。一项针对三家医院127名用户的横断面调查收集了SUS、NuHISS和满意度数据。SUS是满意度的更强预测指标,解释了45%的方差。SUS得分更高且更一致,而NuHISS提供了特定任务的见解。SUS能有效预测满意度,但建议采用综合可用性方法。DIPS Arena中的互操作性挑战影响可用性,而瓦尔基里虚拟健康记录可以增强数据集成。未来的研究应该用主观和客观测量方法完善可用性框架。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验