Oh Do-Youn, He Aiwu Ruth, Qin Shukui, Chen Li-Tzong, Okusaka Takuji, Kim Jin Won, Suksombooncharoen Thatthan, Lee Myung Ah, Kitano Masayuki, Burris Howard A, Bouattour Mohamed, Tanasanvimon Suebpong, Zaucha Renata, Avallone Antonio, Cundom Juan, Kuzko Aleksandra, Wang Julie, Xynos Ioannis, Vogel Arndt, Valle Juan W
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
J Hepatol. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2025.05.003.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: At the TOPAZ-1 (NCT03875235) primary analysis, durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GemCis) significantly improved overall survival (OS) in advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC). We report updated exploratory analyses of OS and safety, extended long-term survivors (eLTS), and subsequent anticancer therapy use.
Participants with aBTC received durvalumab+GemCis or placebo+GemCis every 3 weeks (≤8 cycles), then durvalumab or placebo monotherapy every 4 weeks until progressive disease or other discontinuation criteria were met. OS and serious adverse events were assessed in the full analysis and safety analysis sets, respectively. eLTS outcomes were assessed (full analysis set participants alive ≥30 months after randomisation).
A total of 685 participants were randomised: durvalumab+GemCis (n = 341); placebo+GemCis (n = 344). After a median 41.3 (95% CI 39.3-44.1) months' follow-up in all participants, median OS (95% CI) for durvalumab+GemCis vs. placebo+GemCis was 12.9 (11.6-14.1) vs. 11.3 (10.1-12.5) months (hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI 0.63-0.87]); 36-month OS rate was 14.6% vs. 6.9%, respectively. In participants who achieved disease control (566/685; 82.6%), the 36-month OS rate was higher for durvalumab+GemCis (17.0%) vs. placebo+GemCis (7.6%). Overall, 12.8% were eLTS, with more eLTS in the durvalumab+GemCis (17.0%) vs. placebo+GemCis (8.7%) arms; eLTS included all clinically relevant subgroups. Durvalumab+GemCis improved OS regardless of subsequent anticancer therapy use. In eLTS, serious adverse events were comparable between arms and less frequent than in the full safety analysis set.
Survival benefit and manageable safety continued with durvalumab+GemCis vs. placebo+GemCis approximately 3 years after the last participant was randomised. All clinically relevant subgroups were represented in eLTS, supporting standard-of-care status for durvalumab+GemCis in aBTC.
Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GemCis) was approved for use in advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC) after the primary analysis of the randomised, double-blind, phase III TOPAZ-1 study demonstrated that it significantly improved overall survival (OS) vs. placebo plus GemCis. This update, with analyses of OS and safety, extended long-term survivors, and subsequent anticancer therapy use, took place at a median follow-up of 41.3 months, which, to our knowledge, represents the longest follow-up to date in participants with aBTC. Survival benefit and manageable safety continued with durvalumab plus GemCis, all clinically relevant subgroups were represented in extended long-term survivors, and OS benefit with durvalumab plus GemCis was consistent regardless of subsequent anticancer therapy use. These long-term follow-up results support the standard-of-care status for durvalumab plus GemCis in aBTC, and enable physicians, patients and caregivers to make informed treatment decisions.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03875235; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03875235.
在TOPAZ-1(NCT03875235)的主要分析中,度伐利尤单抗联合吉西他滨和顺铂(GemCis)显著改善了晚期胆管癌(aBTC)患者的总生存期(OS)。我们报告了OS和安全性的更新探索性分析、延长长期生存者(eLTS)以及后续抗癌治疗的使用情况。
aBTC患者每3周接受度伐利尤单抗+GemCis或安慰剂+GemCis治疗(≤8个周期),然后每4周接受度伐利尤单抗或安慰剂单药治疗,直至疾病进展或满足其他停药标准。分别在全分析集和安全性分析集中评估OS和严重不良事件。评估eLTS结局(全分析集中随机分组后存活≥30个月的参与者)。
共685名参与者被随机分组:度伐利尤单抗+GemCis组(n = 341);安慰剂+GemCis组(n = 344)。所有参与者经过中位41.3(95%CI 39.3 - 44.1)个月的随访后,度伐利尤单抗+GemCis组与安慰剂+GemCis组的中位OS(95%CI)分别为12.9(11.6 - 14.1)个月和11.3(10.1 - 12.5)个月(风险比,0.74 [95%CI 0.63 - 0.87]);36个月OS率分别为14.6%和6.9%。在疾病得到控制的参与者中(566/685;82.6%),度伐利尤单抗+GemCis组的36个月OS率(17.0%)高于安慰剂+GemCis组(7.6%)。总体而言,12.8%为eLTS,度伐利尤单抗+GemCis组的eLTS比例(17.0%)高于安慰剂+GemCis组(8.7%);eLTS包括所有临床相关亚组。无论后续是否使用抗癌治疗,度伐利尤单抗+GemCis均能改善OS。在eLTS中,两组的严重不良事件相当,且比全安全性分析集中的频率更低。
在最后一名参与者随机分组约3年后,与安慰剂+GemCis相比,度伐利尤单抗+GemCis持续显示出生存获益且安全性可控。所有临床相关亚组均有eLTS,支持度伐利尤单抗+GemCis在aBTC中的标准治疗地位。
在随机、双盲、III期TOPAZ-1研究的主要分析表明度伐利尤单抗联合吉西他滨和顺铂(GemCis)对比安慰剂联合GemCis显著改善总生存期(OS)后,其被批准用于晚期胆管癌(aBTC)。本次更新包括OS和安全性分析、延长长期生存者以及后续抗癌治疗的使用情况,中位随访时间为41.3个月;据我们所知,这是迄今为止aBTC参与者最长的随访时间。度伐利尤单抗联合GemCis持续显示出生存获益且安全性可控,所有临床相关亚组均有延长长期生存者,且无论后续是否使用抗癌治疗,度伐利尤单抗联合GemCis的OS获益均一致。这些长期随访结果支持度伐利尤单抗联合GemCis在aBTC中的标准治疗地位,并使医生、患者和护理人员能够做出明智的治疗决策。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03875235;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03875235