Wang Xi, Liu Chenxi, Zheng Shuangjiang, Zhang Xinyi, Lin Rujiao, Duan Lixia, Wang Dan, Wang Qianning, Zhong Weidong, Ding Xin
School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Major Disciplinary Platform Under Double First-Class Initiative for Liberal Arts at Huazhong, University of Science and Technology (Research Center for High-Quality Development of Hospitals), Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 17;15(1):17220. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01767-9.
To understand the reasons for the public's irrational use of antibiotics based on the health belief model (HBM). A questionnaire survey was conducted based on cluster random sampling in Chongqing, China. The public's antibiotic use behaviors, knowledge, perceived threat of diseases [both short-term upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) and long-term antibiotic resistance (AR)], perceived value of antibiotic use (benefits and harm), self-efficacy, antibiotic availability and social influences were measured. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was applied to test the fitness of the survey data with the theoretical framework based on the HBM. A total of 815 respondents were enrolled. The irrational use of antibiotics was prevalent among the public (mean: 2.95, SD = 2.12). The public had limited knowledge about antibiotic use (average 29.17% correct answers to 8 questions), a high perceived threat of AR (mean = 2.46, SD = 0.64) and a moderate perceived threat of URTIs (mean = 2.13, SD = 1.04). They also perceived high benefits (mean = 2.57, SD = 0.68) and moderate harm (mean = 2.16, SD = 0.83) from antibiotic use. In addition, respondents had easy access to antibiotics (mean = 2.38, SD = 0.80), perceived a high prevalence of use of antibiotics by relatives (mean = 2.40, SD = 0.65) and had a moderate level of self-efficacy in using antibiotics (mean = 1.97, SD = 0.75). The SEM results showed that higher levels of the perceived threat of URTIs, perceived benefits of antibiotic use, self-efficacy, antibiotic availability and social influence were associated with more irrational antibiotic use behavior (p < 0.005). Moreover, higher knowledge indirectly led to irrational use of antibiotics by promoting self-efficacy (p < 0.001) and the perceived threat of URTIs (p < 0.005). To curb the irrational use of antibiotics, improving knowledge alone is insufficient. A systematic approach addressing multiple dimensions of health beliefs is critical. This includes: (1) targeted public education campaigns emphasizing the limited efficacy of antibiotics for viral infections and reframing perceptions of antibiotic "benefits"; (2) regulatory measures to restrict non-prescription antibiotic sales in pharmacies; (3) clinical guidelines and training to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions by healthcare providers; and (4) community-level interventions leveraging social norms to discourage inappropriate antibiotic use. Policymakers should prioritize interventions that address both individual perceptions (e.g., fear of untreated infections) and systemic drivers (e.g., antibiotic accessibility).
基于健康信念模型(HBM)来理解公众不合理使用抗生素的原因。在中国重庆采用整群随机抽样的方法进行了问卷调查。测量了公众的抗生素使用行为、知识、对疾病的感知威胁(短期上呼吸道感染和长期抗生素耐药性)、抗生素使用的感知价值(益处和危害)、自我效能感、抗生素可及性和社会影响。应用结构方程模型(SEM)来检验调查数据与基于HBM的理论框架的拟合度。共纳入815名受访者。公众中不合理使用抗生素的情况普遍存在(均值:2.95,标准差=2.12)。公众对抗生素使用的知识有限(8个问题的平均正确回答率为29.17%),对耐药性的感知威胁较高(均值=2.46,标准差=0.64),对上呼吸道感染的感知威胁为中等水平(均值=2.13,标准差=1.04)。他们还认为使用抗生素有较高的益处(均值=2.57,标准差=0.68)和中等程度的危害(均值=2.16,标准差=0.83)。此外,受访者很容易获得抗生素(均值=2.38,标准差=0.80),认为亲属使用抗生素的情况很普遍(均值=2.40,标准差=0.65),并且在使用抗生素方面的自我效能感处于中等水平(均值=1.97,标准差=0.75)。SEM结果表明,对上呼吸道感染的感知威胁、抗生素使用的感知益处、自我效能感、抗生素可及性和社会影响水平较高与更不合理的抗生素使用行为相关(p<0.005)。此外,较高的知识水平通过提高自我效能感(p<0.001)和对上呼吸道感染的感知威胁(p<0.005)间接导致抗生素的不合理使用。为了遏制抗生素的不合理使用,仅提高知识水平是不够的。采取一种解决健康信念多个维度的系统方法至关重要。这包括:(1)有针对性的公众教育活动,强调抗生素对病毒感染的疗效有限,并重新构建对抗生素“益处”的认知;(2)限制药店非处方抗生素销售的监管措施;(3)临床指南和培训,以减少医疗服务提供者不必要的抗生素处方;(4)利用社会规范劝阻不当抗生素使用的社区层面干预措施。政策制定者应优先考虑既能解决个人认知(如对未治疗感染的恐惧)又能解决系统性驱动因素(如抗生素可及性)的干预措施。