Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 18;13(1):e062688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062688.
Antibiotic prescribing in primary care contributes significantly to antibiotic overuse. Nudge interventions alter the decision-making environment to achieve behaviour change without restricting options. Our objectives were to conduct a systematic review to describe the types of nudge interventions used to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in primary care, their key features, and their effects on antibiotic prescribing overall.
Medline, Embase and grey literature were searched for randomised trials or regression discontinuity studies in April 2021. Risk of bias was assessed independently by two researchers using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care group's tool. Results were synthesised to report the percentage of studies demonstrating a reduction in overall antibiotic prescribing for different types of nudges. Effects of social norm nudges were examined for features that may enhance effectiveness.
Nineteen studies were included, testing 23 nudge interventions. Four studies were rated as having a high risk of bias, nine as moderate risk of bias and six as at low risk. Overall, 78.3% (n=18, 95% CI 58.1 to 90.3) of the nudges evaluated resulted in a reduction in overall antibiotic prescribing. Social norm feedback was the most frequently applied nudge (n=17), with 76.5% (n=13; 95% CI 52.7 to 90.4) of these studies reporting a reduction. Other nudges applied were changing option consequences (n=3; with 2 reporting a reduction), providing reminders (n=2; 2 reporting a reduction) and facilitating commitment (n=1; reporting a reduction). Successful social norm nudges typically either included an injunctive norm, compared prescribing to physicians with the lowest prescribers or targeted high prescribers.
Nudge interventions are effective for improving antibiotic prescribing in primary care. Expanding the use of nudge interventions beyond social norm nudges could reap further improvements in antibiotic prescribing practices. Policy-makers and managers need to be mindful of how social norm nudges are implemented to enhance intervention effects.
初级保健中的抗生素处方极大地促成了抗生素的过度使用。推动干预措施改变决策环境,以实现行为改变,而不限制选择。我们的目标是进行系统评价,以描述用于减少初级保健中不必要的抗生素处方的推动干预措施的类型、其主要特征以及它们对总体抗生素处方的影响。
2021 年 4 月,我们在 Medline、Embase 和灰色文献中搜索了随机试验或回归不连续性研究。两名研究人员使用 Cochrane 有效实践和组织护理组的工具独立评估偏倚风险。结果综合报告了不同类型的推动干预措施中显示总体抗生素处方减少的研究百分比。对于可能增强有效性的社会规范推动措施的特征,检验了社会规范推动措施的效果。
共纳入 19 项研究,测试了 23 种推动干预措施。4 项研究被评为高偏倚风险,9 项为中偏倚风险,6 项为低偏倚风险。总体而言,评估的推动措施中有 78.3%(n=18,95%置信区间 58.1 至 90.3)导致总体抗生素处方减少。社会规范反馈是应用最广泛的推动措施(n=17),其中 76.5%(n=13;95%置信区间 52.7 至 90.4)的研究报告显示减少。应用的其他推动措施包括改变选择结果(n=3;有 2 项报告减少)、提供提醒(n=2;有 2 项报告减少)和促进承诺(n=1;报告减少)。成功的社会规范推动措施通常包括指令性规范,将处方与最低处方医生进行比较,或针对高处方医生。
推动干预措施对改善初级保健中的抗生素处方是有效的。将推动干预措施的使用扩展到社会规范推动措施之外,可能会进一步改善抗生素处方实践。政策制定者和管理者需要注意如何实施社会规范推动措施,以增强干预效果。