Suppr超能文献

三种不同股骨柄在高位髋关节全髋关节置换术中伴股骨缩短的长期临床比较

Long-term clinical comparison of three different femoral stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty with femoral shortening in patients with high-riding hips.

作者信息

Albayrak Kutalmis, Alpay Yakup, Turk Ozgur Ismail, Mert Muhammed, Akbulut Deniz, Albayrak Akif

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences Baltalimani Bone Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 May 17;20(1):479. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05889-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Developmental hip dysplasia is a common cause of hip arthrosis in young adults, necessitating total hip arthroplasty (THA) for improved function and pain relief. In cases of high-riding hips, transverse femoral shortening osteotomy is often required to facilitate reduction and prevent neurovascular complications. However, the choice of femoral stem in such cases remains controversial due to variations in design and osteoconductive properties. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of three different femoral stems used in THA with transverse femoral shortening osteotomy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 107 patients who underwent THA with transverse femoral shortening osteotomy between 2004 and 2014. Patients were divided into three groups based on the femoral stem used: Group 1 (Summit Tapered Stem (Depuy) (n = 39), Group 2 (SL-PLUS Rectangular Stem (Smith & Nephew) (n = 31), and Group 3 (Wagner Cone Prosthesis (Zimmer) (n = 37). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), and radiological evaluations included osteointegration and union rates. One-way ANOVA was used to compare continuous variables among groups, and post-hoc Tukey's HSD test was applied for pairwise comparisons. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate implant survivorship.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative HHS significantly improved from 42.7 ± 6.7 to 84.6 ± 11.5 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Group 3 had significantly higher final HHS compared to Group 1 (p = 0.0002), while no significant differences were observed between Group 1 and Group 2 (p = 0.1947) or Group 2 and Group 3 (p = 0.0723). The overall 10-year survival rate was 87.8%, with Group 3 demonstrating the highest survivorship (91%) and Group 2 the lowest (83%). Intraoperative femoral fissure or fracture rates were significantly higher in Group 1 compared to Group 3 (p = 0.0006), and with a significantly increased need for additional plating in Group 1 (p = 0.0031).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that cylindrical fully porous-coated femoral stems (Wagner Cone Prosthesis) provide better clinical outcomes, fewer intraoperative complications, and higher long-term survival rates compared to tapered and rectangular stems in THA with femoral shortening osteotomy. These findings highlight the importance of implant selection in optimizing patient outcomes.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

摘要

背景

发育性髋关节发育不良是年轻成年人髋关节骨关节炎的常见病因,需要进行全髋关节置换术(THA)以改善功能和缓解疼痛。对于高位髋关节病例,通常需要进行股骨横向缩短截骨术以促进复位并预防神经血管并发症。然而,由于设计和骨传导特性的差异,此类病例中股骨柄的选择仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较在THA中联合股骨横向缩短截骨术使用的三种不同股骨柄的临床和放射学结果。

方法

对2004年至2014年间接受THA联合股骨横向缩短截骨术的107例患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。根据所使用的股骨柄将患者分为三组:第1组(Summit锥形柄(Depuy))(n = 39),第2组(SL-PLUS矩形柄(史赛克))(n = 31),第3组(Wagner锥形假体(捷迈))(n = 37)。使用Harris髋关节评分(HHS)评估临床结果,放射学评估包括骨整合和愈合率。采用单因素方差分析比较各组间的连续变量,并使用事后Tukey's HSD检验进行两两比较。进行Kaplan-Meier生存分析以评估植入物的生存率。

结果

术前平均HHS从42.7±6.7显著提高至术后的84.6±11.5(p < 0.001)。与第1组相比第3组的最终HHS显著更高(p = 0.0002),而第1组和第2组之间(p = 0.1947)或第2组和第3组之间(p = 0.0723)未观察到显著差异。总体10年生存率为87.8%,第3组的生存率最高(91%),第2组最低(83%)。与第3组相比第1组术中股骨裂纹或骨折发生率显著更高(p = 0.0006),且第1组额外使用钢板的需求显著增加(p = 0.0031)。

结论

本研究表明,在THA联合股骨缩短截骨术中,与锥形柄和矩形柄相比,圆柱形全多孔涂层股骨柄(Wagner锥形假体)具有更好的临床结果、更少的术中并发症和更高的长期生存率。这些发现突出了植入物选择对优化患者预后的重要性。

临床试验编号

不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e29/12084919/aaffbd0adac4/13018_2025_5889_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验