• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奶牛场的空气质量监测:商业奶牛场隧道通风牛舍和挤奶厅空气质量动态描述

Air quality monitoring in dairy farms: Description of air quality dynamics in a tunnel-ventilated housing barn and milking parlor of a commercial dairy farm.

作者信息

Jannat A, Johnson Amanda, Manriquez D

机构信息

AgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

AgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2025 Aug;108(8):8567-8581. doi: 10.3168/jds.2025-26372. Epub 2025 May 16.

DOI:10.3168/jds.2025-26372
PMID:40383385
Abstract

This study aimed to describe air quality dynamics in a commercial dairy farm focusing on 2 locations: a tunnel-ventilated barn (TVB) and a milking parlor (MKP). Assessed air quality components included carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO), methane (CH), ammonia (NH), particulate matter 2.5 µg/m (PM2.5), total volatile organic compounds (VOC), and temperature-humidity index (THI), which were continuously monitored from August 16 to December 22, 2023, using a multiple air quality sensor platform. Descriptive analysis revealed significant hourly variability in the air quality dynamics during the study period. Mixed-effects models revealed no significant differences in the overall CO and THI measurements between the barn and milking parlor. However, the location significantly influenced overall concentrations of other air components including CO, CH, PM2.5, VOC, and NH. Overall comparisons between TVB and MKP showed that the TVB had a higher overall CO concentration mean during the observation period compared with the MKP (LSM ± SEM; 640 ± 9.02 vs. 612 ± 9.01 ppm), while the MKP recorded highest CH levels (11.03 ± 0.52 vs. 8.87 ± 0.52 ppm). In the TVB, the NH levels ranged from 0.401 to 44.9 ppm, whereas no NH was detected in the MKP. The MKP recorded higher overall PM2.5 compared with the TVB (5.51 ± 0.31vs. 3.21 ± 0.31µg/m). The VOC levels exhibited higher overall means in the TVB compared with the MKP (153 ± 2.18 vs. 144 ± 2.16 ppm) but were characterized by substantial variability in both locations. Temporal trends suggested that the monitored air components might be influenced by farm activities such as feeding, cleaning, and milking as identifiable peaks we observed at specific hours of the day. We identified hourly pattern dynamics of CO, CO, CH, NH, PM2.5, VOC, and THI within the TVB and the MKP. Understanding these dynamics provides the opportunity to develop mitigation strategies for enhancing air quality within dairy facilities.

摘要

本研究旨在描述一家商业奶牛场的空气质量动态,重点关注两个地点:一个隧道通风牛舍(TVB)和一个挤奶厅(MKP)。评估的空气质量成分包括一氧化碳(CO)、二氧化碳(CO₂)、甲烷(CH₄)、氨(NH₃)、细颗粒物2.5微克/立方米(PM2.5)、总挥发性有机化合物(VOC)和温湿度指数(THI),使用多空气质量传感器平台于2023年8月16日至12月22日对其进行连续监测。描述性分析显示,在研究期间空气质量动态存在显著的每小时变化。混合效应模型显示,牛舍和挤奶厅之间的总体CO和THI测量值没有显著差异。然而,该位置对包括CO₂、CH₄、PM2.5、VOC和NH₃在内的其他空气成分的总体浓度有显著影响。TVB和MKP之间的总体比较表明,在观察期内,TVB的总体CO浓度平均值高于MKP(最小二乘均值±标准误;640±9.02 vs. 612±9.01 ppm),而MKP记录到的CH₄水平最高(11.03±0.52 vs. 8.87±0.52 ppm)。在TVB中,NH₃水平范围为0.401至44.9 ppm,而在MKP中未检测到NH₃。与TVB相比,MKP记录到的总体PM2.5更高(5.51±0.31 vs. 3.21±0.31微克/立方米)。与MKP相比,TVB中的VOC水平总体平均值更高(153±2.18 vs. 144±2.16 ppm),但在两个地点都表现出很大的变异性。时间趋势表明,监测到的空气成分可能受到农场活动的影响,如喂食、清洁和挤奶活动,我们在一天中的特定时间观察到了可识别的峰值。我们确定了TVB和MKP内CO、CO₂、CH₄、NH₃、PM2.5、VOC和THI的每小时模式动态。了解这些动态为制定改善奶牛场设施空气质量的缓解策略提供了机会。

相似文献

1
Air quality monitoring in dairy farms: Description of air quality dynamics in a tunnel-ventilated housing barn and milking parlor of a commercial dairy farm.奶牛场的空气质量监测:商业奶牛场隧道通风牛舍和挤奶厅空气质量动态描述
J Dairy Sci. 2025 Aug;108(8):8567-8581. doi: 10.3168/jds.2025-26372. Epub 2025 May 16.
2
Invited review: Combined mitigation of methane and ammonia emissions from dairy barns through barn design, ventilation and air treatment systems.特邀综述:通过牛舍设计、通风和空气处理系统联合减轻奶牛场甲烷和氨排放
J Dairy Sci. 2025 Jul;108(7):6565-6586. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-26154. Epub 2025 May 8.
3
Approaches for predicting dairy cattle methane emissions: from traditional methods to machine learning.预测奶牛甲烷排放的方法:从传统方法到机器学习。
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae219.
4
Short-term associations between ambient ammonia concentrations and growing-finishing pig performance and health.环境氨浓度与生长育肥猪生产性能和健康之间的短期关联。
Prev Vet Med. 2025 Sep;242:106555. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106555. Epub 2025 May 5.
5
Effects of city design on transport mode choice and exposure to health risks during and after a crisis: a retrospective observational analysis.危机期间及之后城市设计对交通方式选择和健康风险暴露的影响:一项回顾性观察分析
Lancet Planet Health. 2025 Jun;9(6):e467-e479. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00088-9.
6
Simulation of management practices to reduce nitrogen losses to water and air on well-drained grass-based dairy farms in derogation.模拟管理措施以减少减损情况下排水良好的草地型奶牛场氮素向水和空气的流失。
J Dairy Sci. 2025 Aug;108(8):8548-8566. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-25853. Epub 2025 May 12.
7
A systematic review of ventilation conditions and airborne particulate matter levels in urban offices.一项关于城市办公场所通风条件和空气中颗粒物水平的系统评价。
Indoor Air. 2022 Nov;32(11):e13148. doi: 10.1111/ina.13148.
8
A New Wearable System for Personal Air Pollution Exposure Estimation: Pilot Observational Study.一种用于个人空气污染暴露估计的新型可穿戴系统:初步观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Jul 4;13:e60426. doi: 10.2196/60426.
9
Volatile organic compound emissions from a multi-unit residential building to ambient air.多单元住宅楼向环境空气中排放挥发性有机化合物。
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2025 Apr 15. doi: 10.1039/d4em00689e.
10
Heat abatement during the pre-weaning period: effects on the nasal microbiota of Holstein male calves.断奶前阶段的热缓解:对荷斯坦公牛犊鼻腔微生物群的影响
J Anim Sci. 2025 Jan 4;103. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaf121.