Chen Yen T, Shah Nirali, Hassett Afton L, Huang Suiyuan, Khanna Dinesh, Murphy Susan L
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Scleroderma Program, Ann Arbor, MI.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Scleroderma Program, Ann Arbor, MI.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.05.002.
To examine moderators of intervention effects in fatigue from a randomized controlled trial comparing an online peer-led fatigue self-management intervention to a waitlist control in people with systemic sclerosis (SSc).
Secondary analysis of a 12-week, parallel, single-blind randomized controlled trial.
Community.
Adults with SSc with moderate to severe fatigue (N=173) recruited from SSc specialty centers, a registry, and social media.
A 12-week, online, peer-led fatigue self-management intervention was randomized in a 2:1 ratio: intervention (n=115) and waitlist control (n=58).
The outcome measure was change in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale assessed at baseline, week 6, and week 12. Potential moderators assessed at baseline included demographic, clinical, psychological, and social variables.
Baseline levels of informational support moderated the treatment effect to predict change in fatigue at week 12 (P=.015). Participants who had average to high levels of informational support at baseline reported greater improvements in fatigue at week 12 compared with their counterparts in both treatment groups, whereas the between-moderator difference in the intervention group is significantly larger than in the waitlist control. No other variables were found to significantly moderate the outcomes.
Participants with baseline average to high informational support experienced greater improvements in fatigue at week 12 compared with their counterparts, particularly in the intervention group. This suggests that higher informational support may enhance coping and emotional reassurance. Future research could tailor fatigue interventions based on baseline informational support to optimize treatment efficacy in diverse SSc populations.
在一项随机对照试验中,研究系统性硬化症(SSc)患者疲劳干预效果的调节因素,该试验比较了在线同伴主导的疲劳自我管理干预与候补对照组。
对一项为期12周的平行单盲随机对照试验进行二次分析。
社区。
从SSc专科中心、登记处和社交媒体招募的患有中度至重度疲劳的成年SSc患者(N = 173)。
一项为期12周的在线同伴主导的疲劳自我管理干预以2:1的比例随机分组:干预组(n = 115)和候补对照组(n = 58)。
结局指标是在基线、第6周和第12周评估的慢性病治疗功能评估-疲劳量表的变化。在基线时评估的潜在调节因素包括人口统计学、临床、心理和社会变量。
信息支持的基线水平调节了治疗效果,以预测第12周时疲劳的变化(P = 0.015)。与两个治疗组的对应参与者相比,基线时信息支持水平处于平均至高的参与者在第12周时报告的疲劳改善更大,而干预组中调节因素之间的差异明显大于候补对照组。未发现其他变量对结局有显著调节作用。
与对应参与者相比,基线时信息支持处于平均至高的参与者在第12周时疲劳改善更大,尤其是在干预组。这表明更高的信息支持可能会增强应对能力和情绪安抚。未来的研究可以根据基线信息支持来调整疲劳干预措施,以优化不同SSc人群的治疗效果。