Poulos Allison, Wilson Kylie, Kulinna Pamela Hodges, Schulke Marissa, Perlman Dana, Carson Russ
College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, U.S.A.
Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University, U.S.A.
J Healthy Eat Act Living. 2024 Dec 1;4(3):128-140. eCollection 2024.
Programs implemented in afterschool settings can support children's health; however, their effectiveness may depend on the degree of implementation which can vary by school. In this cluster-randomized controlled trial, we assessed the effect of a play-based curricular intervention on physical activity (PA) levels among children (N=133) attending seven intervention and seven comparison afterschool programs in Arizona (U.S.) using general linear mixed models, and examined how degree of intervention implementation impacted children's PA using linear regression models. PA was measured using wrist-worn accelerometers and degree of implementation was measured using a researcher-developed 100-point index with data from surveys and training attendance from each school. After the intervention, children receiving the curriculum increased their light PA by 4.7 minutes and decreased their sedentary time by an average of 10.2 minutes daily. When degree of implementation was considered, we found variability between schools in children's sedentary time and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) after the intervention. Based on the average time spent in the afterschool programs daily (2.9 hours), children averaged 5.2 more MVPA minutes and 7.0 less sedentary minutes for every 10-point increase in implementation index score. Considering the 30-point variability in scores between schools, this translated to children spending up to 16 minutes more in MVPA and 21 minutes less being sedentary of the average 2.9 hours spent in afterschool programs with the highest level of implementation compared to the lowest. Degree of implementation matters when integrating curricula in afterschool settings that target children's movement. Stronger implementation may reduce children's sedentary behavior and increase MVPA.
在课外环境中实施的项目可以促进儿童健康;然而,其效果可能取决于实施程度,而实施程度可能因学校而异。在这项整群随机对照试验中,我们使用一般线性混合模型评估了一项基于游戏的课程干预对美国亚利桑那州7个干预性课外项目和7个对照性课外项目中133名儿童身体活动(PA)水平的影响,并使用线性回归模型研究了干预实施程度如何影响儿童的身体活动。使用腕戴式加速度计测量身体活动,使用研究人员制定的100分指数测量实施程度,该指数的数据来自调查以及各学校的培训出勤情况。干预后,接受该课程的儿童轻度身体活动时间每天增加4.7分钟,久坐时间平均减少10.2分钟。在考虑实施程度时,我们发现干预后各学校儿童的久坐时间和中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)存在差异。根据每天在课外项目中花费的平均时间(2.9小时),实施指数得分每提高10分,儿童的中度至剧烈身体活动时间平均增加5.2分钟,久坐时间减少7.0分钟。考虑到各学校得分的30分差异,这意味着与实施程度最低的学校相比,在实施程度最高的学校,儿童在每天平均2.9小时的课外项目中,中度至剧烈身体活动时间最多可增加16分钟,久坐时间减少21分钟。在针对儿童运动的课外环境中整合课程时,实施程度很重要。更强有力的实施可能会减少儿童的久坐行为并增加中度至剧烈身体活动。