通过应对现有的不信任来在危机期间建立信任。

Building trust during crises by engaging with existing distrust.

作者信息

Kattumana Tarun, Larson Heidi J

机构信息

Husserl Archives and Center for Phenomenology and Continental Philosophy, Institute for Philosophy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Access-To-Medicines Research Centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 May 2;13:1570243. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1570243. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

It has often been argued that trust cannot be built during crises. While this line of thinking recognizes the importance of building trust before or after crises, it negates the possibility of building trust during a crisis. This paper offers two scenarios to argue for the possibilities of building trust during crises by engaging with existing distrust, with special reference to examples during the COVID-19 pandemic. The first considers distrust towards vaccines and public health interventions among Black Americans that was addressed through interventions that partnered with trusted third parties during the COVID-19 pandemic. The second discusses the Indian transgender community where trust networks built between public health organizations and activists groups was mobilized to engage with existing distrust during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the success of these interventions, this perspective paper ends by clarifying that engaging with distrust does not have to result in achieving public health goals with a brief considerations of two cases: the polio vaccine boycott in Nigeria (2003) and medical populism in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. These examples highlight that if existing distrust toward the medical system is not addressed, then space is created during crises-periods for distrust to be mobilized in ways that compromise public health goals.

摘要

人们常常认为,信任无法在危机期间建立。虽然这种思路认识到在危机之前或之后建立信任的重要性,但它否定了在危机期间建立信任的可能性。本文提供了两种情形,通过应对现有的不信任来论证在危机期间建立信任的可能性,并特别提及了新冠疫情期间的例子。第一个情形考虑了美国黑人对疫苗和公共卫生干预措施的不信任,这种不信任在新冠疫情期间通过与可信赖的第三方合作的干预措施得到了解决。第二个情形讨论了印度的跨性别群体,在新冠疫情期间,公共卫生组织和维权团体之间建立的信任网络被动员起来应对现有的不信任。尽管这些干预措施取得了成功,但这篇观点文章最后澄清,应对不信任不一定会实现公共卫生目标,并简要考虑了两个案例:2003年尼日利亚的脊髓灰质炎疫苗抵制事件以及新冠疫情期间美国的医疗民粹主义。这些例子表明,如果对医疗系统现有的不信任得不到解决,那么在危机时期就会为不信任的动员创造空间,从而损害公共卫生目标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索