• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Institutional Distrust among African Americans and Building Trustworthiness in the COVID-19 Response: Implications for Ethical Public Health Practice.非裔美国人对机构的不信任与在新冠疫情应对中建立可信度:对道德公共卫生实践的启示。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021;32(1):90-98. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2021.0010.
2
Raising the ivory tower: the production of knowledge and distrust of medicine among African Americans.打破象牙塔:非裔美国人的知识生产与对医学的不信任
J Med Ethics. 2007 Mar;33(3):177-80. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.016329.
3
Understanding African Americans' views of the trustworthiness of physicians.了解非裔美国人对医生可信度的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jun;21(6):642-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00485.x.
4
Factors affecting African-American participation in AIDS research.影响非裔美国人参与艾滋病研究的因素。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000 Jul 1;24(3):275-84. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200007010-00014.
5
Trust influences response to public health messages during a bioterrorist event.信任会影响在生物恐怖事件期间对公共卫生信息的反应。
J Health Commun. 2007 Apr-May;12(3):217-32. doi: 10.1080/10810730701265978.
6
Race, medical researcher distrust, perceived harm, and willingness to participate in cardiovascular prevention trials.种族、对医学研究人员的不信任、感知到的危害以及参与心血管预防试验的意愿。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2008 Jan;87(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e3181625d78.
7
Why are African Americans under-represented in medical research studies? Impediments to participation.为什么非裔美国人在医学研究中的代表性不足?参与的障碍。
Ethn Health. 1997 Mar-Jun;2(1-2):31-45. doi: 10.1080/13557858.1997.9961813.
8
Earning the Trust of African American Communities to Increase Representation in Dementia Research.赢得非裔美国人社区的信任以增加痴呆症研究中的代表性。
Ethn Dis. 2020 Nov 19;30(Suppl 2):719-734. doi: 10.18865/ed.30.S2.719. eCollection 2020.
9
Untangling the associations among distrust, race, and neighborhood social environment: a social disorganization perspective.解开不信任、种族和邻里社会环境之间的关联:社会失序视角。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 May;74(9):1342-52. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.012. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
10
Examining the Role of Family History of US Enslavement in Health Care System Distrust Today.考察美国奴隶制家族史在当今医疗保健系统不信任中的作用。
Ethn Dis. 2021 Jul 15;31(3):417-424. doi: 10.18865/ed.31.3.417. eCollection 2021 Summer.

引用本文的文献

1
The complexities of 'trust' in the context of COVID-19 vaccination choices among Black women in Alameda County, CA.加利福尼亚州阿拉米达县黑人女性在新冠疫苗接种选择背景下“信任”的复杂性。
Crit Public Health. 2025;35(1). doi: 10.1080/09581596.2025.2486498. Epub 2025 Apr 12.
2
The Influence of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Influenza Vaccination Refusal and Patient Satisfaction.2019年冠状病毒病大流行对流感疫苗接种拒绝率及患者满意度的影响
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Jun 18;12(7):ofaf351. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf351. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
The impact of COVID-19 on parents from Black ethnic backgrounds in the UK: what we have learned and why it still matters.新冠疫情对英国黑人族裔父母的影响:我们所了解到的情况以及为何这仍很重要。
BJPsych Open. 2025 Jul 8;11(4):e143. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2025.10049.
4
Expanded Child Tax Credit, Family Health, and Material Hardships.扩大的儿童税收抵免、家庭健康与物质困难。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2518335. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.18335.
5
Building trust during crises by engaging with existing distrust.通过应对现有的不信任来在危机期间建立信任。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 2;13:1570243. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1570243. eCollection 2025.
6
Integrating public preferences to overcome racial disparities in research: findings from a US survey on enhancing trust in research data-sharing practices.整合公众偏好以克服研究中的种族差异:一项关于增强对研究数据共享实践信任度的美国调查结果
JAMIA Open. 2025 May 2;8(3):ooaf031. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf031. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Measuring (Mis)trust in the age of COVID-19: viewpoints of vaccine clinical trial participation among individuals living with sickle cell disease.衡量新冠疫情时代的(不)信任:镰状细胞病患者对参与疫苗临床试验的看法
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 28;25(1):1568. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22731-2.
8
Perspectives on COVID-19 Vaccination Among Unvaccinated and Under-Vaccinated African American/Black and Latine Frontline Essential Workers: A Qualitative Exploration.未接种和未充分接种疫苗的非裔美国/黑人及拉丁裔一线 essential workers 对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的看法:一项定性探索。 注:这里“essential workers”直译为“必要工作者”,结合语境可能是“一线关键工作者”之类更合适的表达,但按要求不做额外解释,保留原文。
AIDS Behav. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04708-9.
9
Promoting Equitable Access to Behavioral Health in Rural Communities: Lessons from a Qualitative Study of Oregon's Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Program.促进农村社区行为健康的公平可及性:俄勒冈州认证社区行为健康诊所项目定性研究的经验教训
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 10. doi: 10.1007/s11414-025-09933-7.
10
The Permissibility of Biased AI in a Biased World: An Ethical Analysis of AI for Screening and Referrals for Diabetic Retinopathy in Singapore.在存在偏见的世界中,有偏见的人工智能的可容许性:对新加坡糖尿病视网膜病变筛查和转诊人工智能的伦理分析
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2024 Oct 31;17(1):167-185. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00315-3. eCollection 2025 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Trials Participation Among African Americans and the Ethics of Trust: Leadership Perspectives.非裔美国人参与临床试验及信任伦理:领导者视角
J Healthc Sci Humanit. 2020 Fall;10(1):104-123.
2
The African American Petri Dish.非裔美国人培养皿。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2020;31(2):491-502. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2020.0037.
3
COVID-19 and African Americans.新冠病毒与非裔美国人。
JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1891-1892. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6548.
4
Awareness, Attitudes, and Actions Related to COVID-19 Among Adults With Chronic Conditions at the Onset of the U.S. Outbreak: A Cross-sectional Survey.美国疫情暴发初期慢性病成人对 COVID-19 的认知、态度和行为:一项横断面调查。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jul 21;173(2):100-109. doi: 10.7326/M20-1239. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
5
How to fight an infodemic.如何应对信息疫情。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):676. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X.
6
Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: from phenomena to molecular mechanisms.跨代表观遗传遗传:从现象到分子机制。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019 Dec;59:189-206. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2019.09.012. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
7
Exploring racial influences on flu vaccine attitudes and behavior: Results of a national survey of White and African American adults.探究种族对流感疫苗态度和行为的影响:一项针对白人和非裔美国成年人的全国性调查结果
Vaccine. 2017 Feb 22;35(8):1167-1174. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.12.046. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
8
The Influence of Spiritual Framing on African American Women's Mammography Intentions: A Randomized Trial.精神框架对非裔美国女性乳房X光检查意愿的影响:一项随机试验。
J Health Commun. 2016 Jun;21(6):620-8. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1114055. Epub 2016 May 4.
9
Structural competency: theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality.结构能力:理论化一种新的医学方法,以应对污名和不平等。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Feb;103:126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.032.
10
What are health disparities and health equity? We need to be clear.健康差异和健康公平是什么?我们需要明确这一点。
Public Health Rep. 2014 Jan-Feb;129 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):5-8. doi: 10.1177/00333549141291S203.

非裔美国人对机构的不信任与在新冠疫情应对中建立可信度:对道德公共卫生实践的启示。

Institutional Distrust among African Americans and Building Trustworthiness in the COVID-19 Response: Implications for Ethical Public Health Practice.

出版信息

J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021;32(1):90-98. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2021.0010.

DOI:10.1353/hpu.2021.0010
PMID:33678683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7988507/
Abstract

African Americans are disproportionately affected by COVID-19-related disease and mortality due to long-standing social, political, economic, and environmental injustice; and COVID-19 inequities are exacerbated by institutional distrust. In the absence of trust, public health authorities have not adequately fulfilled their professional and ethical obligations to protect African American communities from the negative effects of COVID-19. As institutional distrust is shaped by individual and collective experiences of untrustworthiness, we propose a paradigm shift from increasing trust among African Americans to increasing trustworthiness among medical and public health institutions/systems throughout the United States. This narrative review extends the literature describing how social determinants contribute to COVID-19 inequities by demonstrating how institutional distrust develops over time and is reinforced through systems of injustice. Additionally, we illustrate consequences of institutional distrust for COVID-19 inequities and provide recommendations for building trustworthiness through ethical public health practice.

摘要

非裔美国人因长期存在的社会、政治、经济和环境不公正而不成比例地受到与 COVID-19 相关的疾病和死亡率的影响;由于机构不信任,COVID-19 的不平等现象更加恶化。在缺乏信任的情况下,公共卫生当局没有充分履行其专业和道德义务,无法保护非裔美国社区免受 COVID-19 的负面影响。由于机构不信任是由个人和集体的不可信经历所塑造的,我们建议将模式从增加非裔美国人之间的信任转变为增加整个美国医疗和公共卫生机构/系统的可信度。本叙述性评论扩展了描述社会决定因素如何导致 COVID-19 不平等的文献,展示了机构不信任是如何随着时间的推移而发展的,并通过不公正的制度得到加强。此外,我们说明了机构不信任对 COVID-19 不平等的后果,并提供了通过道德公共卫生实践建立可信度的建议。