• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正颌外科中骨膜下种植体与微型钛板负荷分布的比较

Comparison of Load Distribution in Subperiosteal Implants and Mini Plates in Orthognathic Surgery.

作者信息

Kasapoglu Metin Berk, Az Zeynep Afra Akbiyik

机构信息

Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Istanbul, Türkiye.

出版信息

Int J Med Sci. 2025 Apr 22;22(10):2257-2268. doi: 10.7150/ijms.111111. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.7150/ijms.111111
PMID:40386052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12080587/
Abstract

Orthognathic surgery is important for correcting craniofacial deformities and restoring occlusion. However, in edentulous patients with severe maxillary atrophy, traditional fixation methods, such as mini plates, may not provide sufficient stability and support for prosthetic rehabilitation. Advances in additive manufacturing have enabled the development of patient-specific subperiosteal implants, offering improved biomechanical performance and more favourable load distribution. This study utilized finite element analysis to compare the biomechanical performance of traditional mini plates and customized subperiosteal implants in maxillary orthognathic surgery. Computed tomography data were used to construct patient-specific models, and a Le Fort I osteotomy with a 9-mm maxillary advancement was simulated. Displacement and stress distribution were analysed under vertical and oblique loading conditions, focusing on critical regions such as osteotomy sites and screw interfaces. Subperiosteal implants exhibited superior biomechanical performance, with significantly lower displacement (0.58 mm) compared to mini plates (4.50 mm). Stress levels in mini plates frequently exceeded the yield strength of grade IV titanium, whereas subperiosteal implants remained within the elastic limit of Ti6Al4V. Additionally, screw stresses were reduced by 38-42% in the subperiosteal implant group, thereby reducing the risk of mechanical failure. Customized subperiosteal implants provided enhanced stability, reduced stress concentrations, and improved load distribution compared to traditional mini plates. These findings highlight their potential as a transformative solution in orthognathic surgery, particularly for edentulous patients with severe maxillary atrophy. Future research should focus on long-term clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness to further establish their role in maxillofacial reconstruction.

摘要

正颌手术对于矫正颅面畸形和恢复咬合关系至关重要。然而,在患有严重上颌骨萎缩的无牙患者中,传统的固定方法,如微型钢板,可能无法为修复体康复提供足够的稳定性和支撑。增材制造技术的进步使得定制的骨膜下种植体得以开发,其生物力学性能得到改善,载荷分布更有利。本研究利用有限元分析比较了传统微型钢板和定制骨膜下种植体在上颌正颌手术中的生物力学性能。利用计算机断层扫描数据构建患者特异性模型,并模拟了9毫米上颌骨前移的Le Fort I截骨术。在垂直和斜向加载条件下分析位移和应力分布,重点关注截骨部位和螺钉界面等关键区域。骨膜下种植体表现出卓越的生物力学性能,与微型钢板(4.50毫米)相比,位移显著更低(0.58毫米)。微型钢板中的应力水平经常超过IV级钛的屈服强度,而骨膜下种植体仍处于Ti6Al4V的弹性极限范围内。此外,骨膜下种植体组的螺钉应力降低了38 - 42%,从而降低了机械故障风险。与传统微型钢板相比,定制骨膜下种植体提供了更高的稳定性、降低了应力集中并改善了载荷分布。这些发现凸显了它们作为正颌手术变革性解决方案的潜力,特别是对于患有严重上颌骨萎缩的无牙患者。未来的研究应关注长期临床结果和成本效益,以进一步确立它们在颌面重建中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d89/12080587/1a3c6cd01eef/ijmsv22p2257g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d89/12080587/c4e59e2a3b1b/ijmsv22p2257g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d89/12080587/764f02d89d20/ijmsv22p2257g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d89/12080587/68115990b485/ijmsv22p2257g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d89/12080587/b16a3f21a6c9/ijmsv22p2257g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d89/12080587/34655049dcaf/ijmsv22p2257g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d89/12080587/ad03129bf01f/ijmsv22p2257g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d89/12080587/1a3c6cd01eef/ijmsv22p2257g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d89/12080587/c4e59e2a3b1b/ijmsv22p2257g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d89/12080587/764f02d89d20/ijmsv22p2257g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d89/12080587/68115990b485/ijmsv22p2257g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d89/12080587/b16a3f21a6c9/ijmsv22p2257g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d89/12080587/34655049dcaf/ijmsv22p2257g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d89/12080587/ad03129bf01f/ijmsv22p2257g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d89/12080587/1a3c6cd01eef/ijmsv22p2257g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Load Distribution in Subperiosteal Implants and Mini Plates in Orthognathic Surgery.正颌外科中骨膜下种植体与微型钛板负荷分布的比较
Int J Med Sci. 2025 Apr 22;22(10):2257-2268. doi: 10.7150/ijms.111111. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of the biomechanical behavior between commercial and 3D-printed patient-specific Ti6Al4V L-Shaped titanium plates following le fort i osteotomy using finite element analysis: A technical Note.基于有限元分析的 Le Fort I 截骨术后商业及 3D 打印患者特异性 Ti6Al4V L 型钛板生物力学行为的比较:一项技术注释。
Med Eng Phys. 2024 Jul;129:104176. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104176. Epub 2024 May 8.
3
Evaluation of prebent miniplates in fixation of Le Fort I advancement osteotomy with the finite element method.使用有限元方法评估预弯微型钢板在Le Fort I型前徙截骨术固定中的应用
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Oct;43(8):1505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
4
Biomechanical interactions of different mini-plate fixations and maxilla advancements in the Le Fort I Osteotomy: a finite element analysis.Le Fort I型截骨术中不同微型钢板固定与上颌骨前移的生物力学相互作用:有限元分析
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2016 Dec;19(16):1704-1713. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2016.1182631. Epub 2016 May 6.
5
A 3D dynamic finite element analysis of biomechanical behaviour of maxilla and fixative appliances following advancement Le Fort I surgery applied in different lengths.上颌骨和固定矫治器生物力学行为的三维动态有限元分析,应用于不同长度的 Le Fort I 骨切开术。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Oct;125(5):101756. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101756. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
6
Comparison of biomechanical behaviour of maxilla following Le Fort I osteotomy with 2- versus 4-plate fixation using 3D-FEA. Part 1: advancement surgery.使用三维有限元分析比较Le Fort I型截骨术后上颌骨采用双板与四板固定的生物力学行为。第1部分:前徙手术。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Dec;37(12):1117-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.10.004. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
7
Comparison of Stress Distribution Among Standard Dental Implants Placed in Grafted Bone, Zygomatic Implants, and Subperiosteal Implants in the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla: 3D Finite Element Analysis.在牙槽骨萎缩的无牙上颌中,标准牙种植体、颧骨种植体和骨膜下种植体的应力分布比较:三维有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023 Mar-Apr;38(2):347-356. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9987.
8
Biomechanical testing of zirconium dioxide osteosynthesis system for Le Fort I advancement osteotomy fixation.氧化锆骨内固定系统用于 Le Fort I 型截骨术固定的生物力学测试。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Jan;77:34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
9
Biomechanical evaluation of implant options for unilateral maxillary defects: a finite element analysis.单侧上颌骨缺损种植体选择的生物力学评价:有限元分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 1;24(1):1338. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05100-0.
10
Stability of maxillary position after Le Fort I osteotomy using self-reinforced biodegradable poly-70L/30DL-lactide miniplates and screws.使用自增强可生物降解聚-70L/30DL-丙交酯微型钢板及螺钉行勒福Ⅰ型截骨术后上颌位置的稳定性
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 May;69(5):1442-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.033. Epub 2010 Dec 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Full-arch rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxilla with additively manufactured custom-made subperiosteal implants: A multicenter retrospective study.采用增材制造的定制骨膜下植入物对严重萎缩的上颌骨进行全颌修复:一项多中心回顾性研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2024 Sep;52(9):991-998. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2024.06.016. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
2
Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Maxilla with Le Fort I Advancement Surgery and Subperiosteal Implant in a Patient With Ectodermal Dysplasia.Le Fort I 型上颌骨提升术和骨膜下植入物在伴有外胚层发育不良的严重萎缩性上颌骨中的康复。
J Craniofac Surg. 2024;35(5):e484-e486. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010380. Epub 2024 May 31.
3
Relationship between bite force, occlusal contact area, and three-dimensional facial soft tissue in dentofacial deformities.
错颌畸形患者的咬合力、咬合接触面积与三维面部软组织的关系。
Codas. 2024 Apr 29;36(3):e20230203. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20242023203en. eCollection 2024.
4
Clinical performance of additively manufactured subperiosteal implants: a systematic review.增材制造的骨膜下植入物的临床性能:系统评价。
Int J Implant Dent. 2024 Feb 5;10(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00521-6.
5
Customized Subperiosteal Implants for the Rehabilitation of Atrophic Jaws: A Consensus Report and Literature Review.用于萎缩性颌骨修复的定制骨膜下种植体:共识报告与文献综述
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 Jan 22;9(1):61. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9010061.
6
Custom-made Subperiosteal Implants: A Finite Element Analysis on Monoblock and Dual Implant Systems in Atrophic Maxilla.定制性骨膜下植入物:在萎缩性上颌骨中单块和双植入物系统的有限元分析。
Int J Med Sci. 2023 Oct 16;20(13):1755-1762. doi: 10.7150/ijms.89411. eCollection 2023.
7
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of a Premaxillary Device: A New Type of Subperiosteal Implant to Treat Severe Atrophy of the Maxilla.前颌骨装置的有限元分析:一种治疗上颌骨严重萎缩的新型骨膜下种植体
Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Jul 31;8(4):336. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8040336.
8
Biomechanical evaluation of Chinese customized three-dimensional printed titanium miniplate in the Lefort I osteotomy: A finite element analysis.中国定制三维打印钛微型钢板在Le Fort I型截骨术中的生物力学评估:有限元分析
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 9;8(12):e12152. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12152. eCollection 2022 Dec.
9
Submodelling approach to screw-to-bone interaction in additively manufactured subperiosteal implant structures.增材制造骨膜下植入物结构中螺钉-骨相互作用的子模型方法。
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2023 Feb;39(2):e3672. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3672. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
10
How Navigate the Map: The Effect of Surface Topography on the Adhesion of on Biomaterials.如何导航地图:表面形貌对生物材料上细胞黏附的影响
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 18;15(14):4988. doi: 10.3390/ma15144988.