• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前颌骨装置的有限元分析:一种治疗上颌骨严重萎缩的新型骨膜下种植体

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of a Premaxillary Device: A New Type of Subperiosteal Implant to Treat Severe Atrophy of the Maxilla.

作者信息

Cipollina Alessandro, Ceddia Mario, Di Pietro Natalia, Inchingolo Francesco, Tumedei Margherita, Romasco Tea, Piattelli Adriano, Specchiulli Alessandro, Trentadue Bartolomeo

机构信息

Independent Researcher, 92019 Sciacca, Italy.

Department of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Politecnico di Bari University, 70125 Bari, Italy.

出版信息

Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Jul 31;8(4):336. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8040336.

DOI:10.3390/biomimetics8040336
PMID:37622941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10452205/
Abstract

Extreme atrophy of the maxilla still poses challenges for clinicians. Some of the techniques used to address this issue can be complex, risky, expensive, and time consuming, often requiring skilled surgeons. While many commonly used techniques have achieved very high success rates, complications may arise in certain cases. In this context, the premaxillary device (PD) technique offers a simpler approach to reconstruct severely atrophic maxillae, aiming to avoid more complicated and risky surgical procedures. Finite element analysis (FEA) enables the evaluation of different aspects of dental implant biomechanics. Our results demonstrated that using a PD allows for an optimal distribution of stresses on the basal bone, avoiding tension peaks that can lead to bone resorption or implant failure. ANSYS was used to perform localized finite element analysis (FEA), enabling a more precise examination of the peri-crestal area and the PD through an accurate mesh element reconstruction, which facilitated the mathematical solution of FEA. The most favorable biomechanical behavior was observed for materials such as titanium alloys, which helped to reduce stress levels on bone, implants, screws, and abutments. Additionally, stress values remained within the limits of basal bone and titanium alloy strengths. In conclusion, from a biomechanical point of view, PDs appear to be viable alternatives for rehabilitating severe atrophic maxillae.

摘要

上颌骨的极度萎缩仍然给临床医生带来挑战。一些用于解决这一问题的技术可能很复杂、有风险、昂贵且耗时,通常需要技术娴熟的外科医生。虽然许多常用技术已取得非常高的成功率,但在某些情况下仍可能出现并发症。在此背景下,前颌骨装置(PD)技术为重建严重萎缩的上颌骨提供了一种更简单的方法,旨在避免更复杂且有风险的外科手术。有限元分析(FEA)能够评估牙种植体生物力学的不同方面。我们的结果表明,使用PD可使应力在基骨上实现最佳分布,避免可能导致骨吸收或种植体失败的张力峰值。使用ANSYS进行局部有限元分析(FEA),通过精确的网格单元重建能够更精确地检查牙槽嵴周围区域和PD,这有助于FEA的数学求解。对于钛合金等材料,观察到了最有利的生物力学行为,这有助于降低骨、种植体、螺钉和基台上的应力水平。此外,应力值保持在基骨和钛合金强度的范围内。总之,从生物力学角度来看,PD似乎是修复严重萎缩上颌骨的可行替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/74cdf7493565/biomimetics-08-00336-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/d35870f262b1/biomimetics-08-00336-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/6b669a65f75d/biomimetics-08-00336-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/3c97488b76d6/biomimetics-08-00336-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/9ea6fff83966/biomimetics-08-00336-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/3fc1b7d8581b/biomimetics-08-00336-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/ed1634c97e9c/biomimetics-08-00336-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/da9a7da0cee8/biomimetics-08-00336-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/7cd424c2dd09/biomimetics-08-00336-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/d98a58b06aae/biomimetics-08-00336-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/82ae1e055b95/biomimetics-08-00336-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/cbc361180c40/biomimetics-08-00336-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/9d0ef9fac4a1/biomimetics-08-00336-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/3343c810b9e0/biomimetics-08-00336-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/74cdf7493565/biomimetics-08-00336-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/d35870f262b1/biomimetics-08-00336-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/6b669a65f75d/biomimetics-08-00336-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/3c97488b76d6/biomimetics-08-00336-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/9ea6fff83966/biomimetics-08-00336-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/3fc1b7d8581b/biomimetics-08-00336-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/ed1634c97e9c/biomimetics-08-00336-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/da9a7da0cee8/biomimetics-08-00336-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/7cd424c2dd09/biomimetics-08-00336-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/d98a58b06aae/biomimetics-08-00336-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/82ae1e055b95/biomimetics-08-00336-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/cbc361180c40/biomimetics-08-00336-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/9d0ef9fac4a1/biomimetics-08-00336-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/3343c810b9e0/biomimetics-08-00336-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/823c/10452205/74cdf7493565/biomimetics-08-00336-g014.jpg

相似文献

1
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of a Premaxillary Device: A New Type of Subperiosteal Implant to Treat Severe Atrophy of the Maxilla.前颌骨装置的有限元分析:一种治疗上颌骨严重萎缩的新型骨膜下种植体
Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Jul 31;8(4):336. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8040336.
2
Comparison of Stress Distribution Among Standard Dental Implants Placed in Grafted Bone, Zygomatic Implants, and Subperiosteal Implants in the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla: 3D Finite Element Analysis.在牙槽骨萎缩的无牙上颌中,标准牙种植体、颧骨种植体和骨膜下种植体的应力分布比较:三维有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023 Mar-Apr;38(2):347-356. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9987.
3
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant stability in the atrophic posterior maxilla: a mathematical study of the sinus floor augmentation.萎缩性上颌后牙区种植体稳定性的三维有限元分析:上颌窦底提升的数学研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Dec;13(6):657-65. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130613.x.
4
Finite element analysis of zygomatic implants in intrasinus and extramaxillary approaches for prosthetic rehabilitation in severely atrophic maxillae.颧骨种植体在鼻窦内和上颌外入路修复严重萎缩上颌骨中的有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 May-Jun;28(3):e151-60. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2304.
5
Finite element analysis of three zygomatic implant techniques for the severely atrophic edentulous maxilla.严重萎缩性无牙颌的三种颧骨种植技术的有限元分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Mar;111(3):203-15. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
6
Rehabilitation of Atrophic Posterior Maxilla with Pterygoid Implants: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.翼状种植体修复萎缩性上颌后牙区:三维有限元分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 May-Jun;36(3):e51-e62. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8185.
7
Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.对上颌窦底后部植入种植体后不同骨部位产生的功能应力进行三维有限元分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jan;93(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.001.
8
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of zygomatic implants for rehabilitation of patients with a severely atrophic maxilla.三维有限元分析颧骨种植体修复严重上颌骨萎缩患者
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Apr;129(4):597.e1-597.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.012. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
9
Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis.钛种植体与氧化锆种植体支持上颌覆盖义齿的三维有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Sep-Oct;28(5):e198-208. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3019.
10
Assessment of stress/strain in dental implants and abutments of alternative materials compared to conventional titanium alloy-3D non-linear finite element analysis.与传统钛合金相比,替代材料的牙种植体和基台应力/应变评估——三维非线性有限元分析
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2020 Jun;23(8):372-383. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1731481. Epub 2020 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Indications and Complications of Subperiosteal Implants: Literature Review and Case Series.骨膜下植入物的适应症与并发症:文献综述及病例系列
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;13(8):337. doi: 10.3390/dj13080337.
2
Effect of Crestal Position on Bone-Implant Stress Interface of Three-Implant Splinted Prostheses: A Finite Element Analysis.嵴顶位置对三种植体联冠修复体骨-种植体应力界面的影响:有限元分析
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jul 16;18(14):3344. doi: 10.3390/ma18143344.
3
Biomechanical effects of digitally constructed titanium, modified polyetheretherketone, and polyetherketoneketone subperiosteal implants on atrophied maxilla: a finite element analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of a Self-Condensing Bone Implant in One-Stage Sinus Augmentation: A 3-Year Follow-Up Retrospective Study.单阶段鼻窦提升中自凝骨植入的临床和放射学评估:一项为期 3 年的回顾性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 31;20(3):2583. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032583.
2
Custom-Made Direct Metal Laser Sintering Titanium Subperiosteal Implants in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for Severe Bone-Deficient Patients-A Pilot Study.定制直接金属激光烧结钛骨膜下种植体在口腔颌面外科治疗严重骨缺损患者中的应用——一项初步研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 19;12(10):2531. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102531.
3
数字化构建的钛、改性聚醚醚酮和聚醚酮酮骨膜下种植体对萎缩上颌骨的生物力学效应:有限元分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 10;25(1):1142. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06426-z.
4
Biomechanical evaluation of conventional, zygomatic, zygomatic bone anchored subperiosteal and maxilla anchored subperiosteal implants applied totally edentulous maxilla: finite element stress analysis.常规种植体、颧骨种植体、颧骨骨膜下锚固种植体及上颌骨骨膜下锚固种植体应用于全口无牙上颌骨的生物力学评估:有限元应力分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1038. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06387-3.
5
Comparison of Load Distribution in Subperiosteal Implants and Mini Plates in Orthognathic Surgery.正颌外科中骨膜下种植体与微型钛板负荷分布的比较
Int J Med Sci. 2025 Apr 22;22(10):2257-2268. doi: 10.7150/ijms.111111. eCollection 2025.
6
Loading Pressure Induced by 4 mm Implants on the Inferior Alveolar Nerve: A 3D Finite Element Analysis Model.4毫米种植体对下牙槽神经产生的加载压力:三维有限元分析模型
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 7;14(7):2535. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072535.
7
A Finite Element Study of Simulated Fusion in an L4-L5 Model: Influence of the Combination of Materials in the Screw-and-Rod Fixation System on Reproducing Natural Bone Behavior.L4-L5模型中模拟融合的有限元研究:螺钉-棒固定系统中材料组合对再现天然骨行为的影响。
Biomimetics (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;10(2):72. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10020072.
8
New Subperiosteal Dental Implant Design with Finite Element Analysis and Mechanical Validation: A Design Validation Study.基于有限元分析和力学验证的新型骨膜下牙种植体设计:一项设计验证研究。
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jan 29;18(3):622. doi: 10.3390/ma18030622.
9
Comparison of Screws with Different Diameters in Subperiosteal Implant Application with Finite Element Analysis.不同直径骨皮质下种植螺钉的有限元分析比较。
Int J Med Sci. 2024 Oct 7;21(13):2595-2602. doi: 10.7150/ijms.93225. eCollection 2024.
10
The Stresses and Deformations in the Abfraction Lesions of the Lower Premolars Studied by the Finite Element Analyses: Case Report and Review of Literature.有限元分析研究下颌前磨牙磨损病变中的应力与变形:病例报告及文献综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Apr 9;14(8):788. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14080788.
Implants in the pterygoid region: An updated systematic review of modern roughened surface implants.
翼状区域植入物:现代粗糙表面植入物的最新系统评价
J Prosthodont. 2023 Apr;32(4):285-291. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13600. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
4
Success Rates of Zygomatic Implants for the Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Maxilla: A Systematic Review.颧骨种植体修复严重萎缩上颌骨的成功率:一项系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Aug 12;10(8):151. doi: 10.3390/dj10080151.
5
Complications of sinus floor elevation procedure and management strategies: A systematic review.上颌窦底提升术的并发症及处理策略:一项系统评价
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Dec;24(6):740-765. doi: 10.1111/cid.13086. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
6
The atrophic edentulous alveolus. A preliminary study on a new generation of subperiosteal implants.萎缩性无牙牙槽嵴。新一代骨膜下种植体的初步研究。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Mar;27(1):69-78. doi: 10.1007/s10006-022-01044-3. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
7
Additively Manufactured Lattice-like Subperiosteal Implants for Rehabilitation of the Severely Atrophic Ridge.增材制造的类骨小梁状骨膜下植入物用于严重萎缩牙槽嵴的修复。
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022 Feb 14;8(2):912-920. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00962. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
8
Evaluation of Stresses on Implant, Bone, and Restorative Materials Caused by Different Opposing Arch Materials in Hybrid Prosthetic Restorations Using the All-on-4 Technique.使用All-on-4技术的混合修复体中,不同对颌弓材料对种植体、骨组织和修复材料所产生应力的评估。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Aug 1;14(15):4308. doi: 10.3390/ma14154308.
9
Survival Rate and Prosthetic and Sinus Complications of Zygomatic Dental Implants for the Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颧种植体修复上颌骨萎缩性无牙颌的生存率、修复体及窦并发症:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Biology (Basel). 2021 Jun 29;10(7):601. doi: 10.3390/biology10070601.
10
Clinical outcomes and biological and mechanical complications of immediate fixed prostheses supported by zygomatic implants: A retrospective analysis from a prospective clinical study with up to 11 years of follow-up.颧骨种植体即刻修复固定义齿的临床效果及生物学和机械并发症:一项前瞻性临床研究的回顾性分析,随访时间长达 11 年。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Aug;23(4):612-624. doi: 10.1111/cid.13017. Epub 2021 Jun 22.