Suppr超能文献

从卫生服务角度对澳大利亚偏远地区三种联合健康护理模式的成本比较:学生辅助服务、飞行出诊服务和驻地临床医生提供的服务。

A Cost Comparison From a Health Service Perspective of Three Allied Health Models of Care for Remote Australia: Student-Assisted Services, Fly-In Fly-Out Services and Services Provided by a Resident Clinician.

作者信息

Campbell Narelle, Roseleur Jackie, Karnon Jon, Hince Chris, Cairns Alice, Stothers Kylie, Rissel Chris

机构信息

College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.

College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Aust J Rural Health. 2025 Jun;33(3):e70012. doi: 10.1111/ajr.70012.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this paper is to compare the costs of an allied health student-assisted model of care with Fly-In-Fly-Out (FIFO) and resident clinician models of care from a health system perspective.

METHODS

A descriptive cost analysis was conducted to understand the costs of an allied health student-assisted model of care. Scenarios were developed for the two remaining service models to determine their costs from a health service perspective.

DESIGN

An observed and modelled costing study.

SETTING

Northern Territory, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Allied health professionals and students.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The cost of providing a student-assisted model of care from a health service perspective.

RESULTS

The students provided an average of 5 h of service time per client to 50 clients at a cost of $2363 per client. Three resident clinician and FIFO scenarios were modelled. The first scenario was based on time with clients across all three student cohorts. The second scenario applied the time spent with clients by the third cohort, reflecting the increase in time spent with clients as the program matured. In the third scenario, we increased the time in scenario 2 by 25% to account for the potential under-recording of client time. The resident clinician results for the three scenarios were $915, $987, and $1178, respectively. The FIFO results for the three scenarios were $1502, $1575, and $1922, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The student-assisted model was more expensive per client seen than the FIFO and resident clinician models, but significant intangible benefits were identified that positively impact both clients and students. These include training health professionals for remote communities in a culturally responsive model, greater cultural understanding, and increased care coordination provided by the students.

摘要

目的

本文旨在从卫生系统的角度比较联合健康专业学生辅助护理模式与飞来飞去(FIFO)及驻院临床医生护理模式的成本。

方法

进行描述性成本分析以了解联合健康专业学生辅助护理模式的成本。针对其余两种服务模式制定了方案,以从卫生服务的角度确定其成本。

设计

一项观察性和模型化成本研究。

地点

澳大利亚北领地。

参与者

联合健康专业人员和学生。

主要观察指标

从卫生服务角度提供学生辅助护理模式的成本。

结果

学生为每位客户平均提供5小时服务时间,共服务50位客户,每位客户的成本为2363美元。对三种驻院临床医生和FIFO方案进行了建模。第一种方案基于所有三个学生群体与客户相处的时间。第二种方案采用第三个群体与客户相处的时间,反映随着项目成熟与客户相处时间的增加。在第三种方案中,我们将方案2中的时间增加了25%,以考虑客户时间可能记录不足的情况。三种方案中驻院临床医生的成本结果分别为915美元、987美元和1178美元。三种方案中FIFO的成本结果分别为1502美元、1575美元和1922美元。

结论

与FIFO和驻院临床医生模式相比,学生辅助模式每位客户的成本更高,但发现了显著的无形收益,对客户和学生都产生了积极影响。这些收益包括以具有文化响应性的模式为偏远社区培训卫生专业人员、增强文化理解以及学生提供更多的护理协调。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7454/12087267/63ec248203ec/AJR-33-0-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验