Suppr超能文献

评估65岁以下医疗保险受益人的医疗服务可及性。

Evaluating access to care for Medicare beneficiaries younger than 65 Years.

作者信息

Achola Emma M, Jazowski Shelley A, Nicholas Lauren Hersch, Keohane Laura M, Wood William A, Friese Christopher R, Dusetzina Stacie B

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2525 West End Ave, Ste 1275, Nashville, TN 37203. Email:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2025 May;31(5):222-229. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2025.89732.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Individuals younger than 65 years can qualify for Medicare if they have long-term disabilities or certain qualifying conditions. These beneficiaries-particularly the non-dual-eligible population-may experience cost and access barriers to medical care. We examined the association between Medicare coverage type and reported barriers to care.

STUDY DESIGN

Multivariable linear probability models assessed the association between self-reported Medicare coverage and patient-reported outcomes by dual-eligibility status.

METHODS

Using 2012-2020 data from the Health and Retirement Study, we compared self-reported sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of non-dual-eligible and dual-eligible beneficiaries aged 50 to 64 years by Medicare coverage type at their baseline interview. We then examined the following self-reported outcomes: experiencing cost-related medication nonadherence, delaying care due to cost, not having a usual source of care, and having trouble finding a doctor.

RESULTS

Among non-dual-eligible beneficiaries, enrollment in traditional Medicare (TM) plus supplemental coverage vs TM with no supplemental coverage was associated with lower reported rates of experiencing cost-related medication nonadherence (-7.5 percentage point [PP] change; 95% CI, -12.1 to -3.0), delaying care due to cost (-9.8 PP; 95% CI, -13.3 to -6.3), and having no usual source of care (-5.5 PP; 95% CI, -8.9 to -2.1). Compared with TM with no supplement, Medicare Advantage enrollment was associated with lower rates of delaying care due to cost (-4.2 PP; 95% CI, -7.6 to -0.7) and having no usual source of care (-5.2 PP; 95% CI, -8.2 to -2.3). Among dual-eligible beneficiaries, outcomes largely did not differ by coverage type. Switching from traditional Medicare to Medicare Advantage was associated with trouble finding a doctor for dual-eligible beneficiaries.

CONCLUSIONS

Enrollment in less generous Medicare coverage was associated with greater cost and access barriers to care for beneficiaries younger than 65 years.

摘要

目标

65岁以下的个人若患有长期残疾或某些符合条件的疾病,可符合医疗保险资格。这些受益人,尤其是非双重资格人群,可能在医疗保健的费用和就医机会方面面临障碍。我们研究了医疗保险覆盖类型与报告的就医障碍之间的关联。

研究设计

多变量线性概率模型通过双重资格状态评估了自我报告的医疗保险覆盖情况与患者报告的结果之间的关联。

方法

利用健康与退休研究2012 - 2020年的数据,我们在基线访谈时,按医疗保险覆盖类型比较了50至64岁非双重资格和双重资格受益人的自我报告的社会人口统计学和健康相关特征。然后,我们研究了以下自我报告的结果:经历与费用相关的药物治疗不依从、因费用而推迟就医、没有固定的医疗服务来源以及找医生困难。

结果

在非双重资格受益人中,参加传统医疗保险(TM)加补充保险与参加无补充保险的TM相比,报告的与费用相关的药物治疗不依从发生率较低(变化-7.5个百分点[PP];95%置信区间,-12.1至-3.0),因费用而推迟就医的发生率较低(-9.8 PP;95%置信区间,-13.3至-6.3),且没有固定医疗服务来源的发生率较低(-5.5 PP;95%置信区间,-8.9至-2.1)。与无补充的TM相比,参加医疗保险优势计划与因费用而推迟就医的发生率较低(-4.2 PP;95%置信区间,-7.6至-0.7)以及没有固定医疗服务来源的发生率较低(-5.2 PP;95%置信区间,-8.2至-2.3)相关。在双重资格受益人中,不同覆盖类型的结果在很大程度上没有差异。从传统医疗保险转向医疗保险优势计划与双重资格受益人找医生困难有关。

结论

参加福利较差的医疗保险与65岁以下受益人在医疗保健的费用和就医机会方面面临更大障碍有关。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验