Porreco R P
Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Mar;65(3):307-11.
Cesarean section rates in the United States have increased dramatically in recent years, whereas perinatal mortality rates have fallen. To investigate the hypothesis that these two events are not necessarily causally related, a prospective attempt to modify obstetric management directed at minimizing the rate of abdominal delivery while preserving excellent perinatal survival was done at a university-affiliated hospital in the Denver metropolitan area. Unselected patients who were admitted to separate services at the hospital were used for comparison, with one group subject to the specific management criteria. Corrected mortality rates and low five-minute Apgar scores on the two services were not significantly different after two years. The total cesarean section rate on the first service was 5.7%, and the total cesarean section rate on the comparison service was 17.6%. Analysis of the data showed major differences in indications for cesarean section in the areas of repeat cesarean section, cephalopelvic disproportion, breech presentation, fetal distress, and genital herpes. These data support the contention that excellent perinatal outcome can be achieved with modest abdominal delivery rates.
近年来,美国的剖宫产率急剧上升,而围产期死亡率却有所下降。为了研究这两个事件不一定存在因果关系这一假设,在丹佛市区一家大学附属医院进行了一项前瞻性尝试,旨在调整产科管理方式,在保持围产期高存活率的同时尽量降低剖宫产率。将入住该医院不同科室的未经挑选的患者作为对照,其中一组遵循特定的管理标准。两年后,两个科室的校正死亡率和低5分钟阿氏评分并无显著差异。第一个科室的总剖宫产率为5.7%,对照科室的总剖宫产率为17.6%。数据分析表明,在再次剖宫产、头盆不称、臀位、胎儿窘迫和生殖器疱疹等剖宫产指征方面存在重大差异。这些数据支持了这样的观点,即适度的剖宫产率也能实现良好的围产期结局。