• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对手部、腕部、前臂和肘部有不适症状患者的上肢功能能力简短评估:结构效度与重测信度的构成及评估

A Shortened Upper Extremity Functional Capacity Evaluation for Patients with Complaints of Hand, Wrist, Forearm, and Elbow: Composition and Assessment of Construct Validity and Test-Retest Reliability.

作者信息

Berduszek Redmar J, Dekker Rienk, van der Sluis Corry K, Reneman Michiel F

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Occup Rehabil. 2025 May 19. doi: 10.1007/s10926-025-10298-z.

DOI:10.1007/s10926-025-10298-z
PMID:40388036
Abstract

PURPOSE

Upper extremity functional capacity evaluation (UE-FCE) contains tests covering aspects of upper extremity functioning. UE-FCE tests usually consist of multiple repeated trials. Shortened UE-FCEs with less trials per test have been proposed but never tested in patients. The aims of this study were (1) to compose a shortened UE-FCE (fewer trials per test) and (2) to assess construct validity and test-retest reliability when applied in patients with nontraumatic musculoskeletal complaints of the hand, wrist, forearm, and elbow.

METHODS

Participants performed a UE-FCE, with original full-length tests, twice (1 to 3 weeks apart). A shortened UE-FCE, with fewer trials per test, was composed based on the agreement (ICC ≥ 0.90) between shortened and original UE-FCE tests. Consequently, construct validity and test-retest reliability of the shortened UE-FCE tests were assessed.

RESULTS

UE-FCEs were performed by 45 participants. The proposed shortened UE-FCE included one-trial tests for hand grip and finger strength (instead of three-trial tests), two-trial tests for fingertip and hand/forearm dexterity (instead of three-trial and four-trial tests, respectively). Overhead lifting and working tests were already one-trial tests and remain unchanged. Construct validity was demonstrated for hand grip strength of the left hand, overhead lifting, and overhead working, but not for hand grip strength of the right hand, finger strength, fingertip dexterity and hand and forearm dexterity. Test-retest reliability was above 0.70 for all tests, except for fingertip dexterity of the dominant hand (0.59).

CONCLUSION

The shortened UE-FCE with fewer trials per test agreed strongly with the original UE-FCE. Using the shortened UE-FCE could save 18 min. Construct validity differed per UE-FCE test. Test-retest reliability was sufficient for all UE-FCE tests except fingertip dexterity of the dominant hand.

摘要

目的

上肢功能能力评估(UE-FCE)包含了涵盖上肢功能各方面的测试。UE-FCE测试通常由多次重复试验组成。有人提出了每次测试试验次数较少的简化版UE-FCE,但从未在患者中进行过测试。本研究的目的是:(1)编制一个简化版UE-FCE(每次测试试验次数更少);(2)评估将其应用于手部、腕部、前臂和肘部非创伤性肌肉骨骼疾病患者时的结构效度和重测信度。

方法

参与者进行了两次UE-FCE,采用原始的完整测试(间隔1至3周)。基于简化版和原始UE-FCE测试之间的一致性(组内相关系数[ICC]≥0.90),编制了每次测试试验次数更少的简化版UE-FCE。随后,评估了简化版UE-FCE测试的结构效度和重测信度。

结果

45名参与者进行了UE-FCE测试。提议的简化版UE-FCE包括握力和手指力量的单次试验测试(而非三次试验测试),指尖和手/前臂灵巧性的两次试验测试(分别取代三次试验和四次试验测试)。 overhead lifting和工作测试已经是单次试验测试,保持不变。左手握力、 overhead lifting和 overhead working的结构效度得到了验证,但右手握力、手指力量、指尖灵巧性以及手和前臂灵巧性的结构效度未得到验证。除优势手指尖灵巧性(0.59)外,所有测试的重测信度均高于0.70。

结论

每次测试试验次数更少的简化版UE-FCE与原始UE-FCE高度一致。使用简化版UE-FCE可节省18分钟。不同的UE-FCE测试结构效度有所不同。除优势手指尖灵巧性外,所有UE-FCE测试的重测信度都足够。

相似文献

1
A Shortened Upper Extremity Functional Capacity Evaluation for Patients with Complaints of Hand, Wrist, Forearm, and Elbow: Composition and Assessment of Construct Validity and Test-Retest Reliability.针对手部、腕部、前臂和肘部有不适症状患者的上肢功能能力简短评估:结构效度与重测信度的构成及评估
J Occup Rehabil. 2025 May 19. doi: 10.1007/s10926-025-10298-z.
2
Functional Capacity Evaluation in Upper Limb Reduction Deficiency and Amputation: Development and Pilot Testing.上肢部分缺失和截肢患者的功能能力评估:制定和初步测试。
J Occup Rehabil. 2018 Mar;28(1):158-169. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9703-4.
3
Basis for an FCE methodology for patients with work-related upper limb disorders.针对与工作相关的上肢疾病患者的功能能力评估(FCE)方法的依据。
J Occup Rehabil. 2005 Sep;15(3):353-63. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-5942-x.
4
Construct Validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation in Patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders.挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者功能能力评估的结构效度
J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Sep;25(3):481-92. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9555-0.
5
Validity and reliability of the chronic composite XA, an upper limb motor assessment using Active Range of Motion in patients with chronic stroke.慢性复合 XA 的有效性和可靠性,一种使用主动关节活动度评估慢性中风患者上肢运动的方法。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Aug;60(4):559-566. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08463-6. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
6
Measurement properties of the Dutch versions of QuickDASH and PRWHE in patients with complaints of hand, wrist, forearm and elbow.荷兰版 QuickDASH 和 PRWHE 在手部、腕部、前臂和肘部抱怨患者中的测量性能。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2024;37(4):871-881. doi: 10.3233/BMR-230225.
7
Evaluation of Test-Retest Reliability for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity and Pain Interference Computer Adaptive Tests in a Hand Surgery Population.手部手术人群中患者报告结局测量信息系统上肢和疼痛干扰计算机自适应测试的重测信度评估。
J Hand Surg Am. 2025 Jun;50(6):648-655. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.03.006. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
8
Reliability and Validity of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scoring System for the Upper Extremity in Japanese Patients.日本患者上肢肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会评分系统的可靠性和有效性
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep;475(9):2253-2259. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5390-x. Epub 2017 May 30.
9
Effects of an assist-as-needed equipped Tenodesis-Induced-Grip Exoskeleton Robot (TIGER) on upper limb function in patients with chronic stroke.按需辅助的经皮神经电刺激诱发握力康复外骨骼机器人(TIGER)对慢性脑卒中患者上肢功能的影响。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Jan 3;21(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01298-2.
10
Reliability of Telephone Acquisition of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test.电话获取 PROMIS 上肢计算机自适应测试的可靠性。
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Mar;46(3):187-199. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.09.014. Epub 2020 Nov 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Measurement properties of the Dutch versions of QuickDASH and PRWHE in patients with complaints of hand, wrist, forearm and elbow.荷兰版 QuickDASH 和 PRWHE 在手部、腕部、前臂和肘部抱怨患者中的测量性能。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2024;37(4):871-881. doi: 10.3233/BMR-230225.
2
Health-related physical fitness in patients with complaints of hand, wrist, forearm and elbow: an exploratory study.手部、腕部、前臂和肘部有不适症状患者的健康相关身体素质:一项探索性研究。
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021 Oct 4;7(4):e001148. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001148. eCollection 2021.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Hand Function Sort in patients with complaints of hand and/or wrist.
手部和/或腕部不适患者 Hand Function Sort 荷兰语版的跨文化调适及其心理计量特性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jun 7;20(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2649-2.
4
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: development of an assessment set to evaluate functioning based on the Brief ICF Core Set for Hand Conditions - ICF Hand.《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》:基于手部疾病简版国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心集(ICF手部核心集)制定一套评估功能的评估工具。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017 Sep;42(7):731-741. doi: 10.1177/1753193417706248. Epub 2017 May 10.
5
Sick leave in workers with arm, neck and/or shoulder complaints; defining occurrence and discriminative trajectories over a 2-year time period.患有手臂、颈部和/或肩部疾病的工人的病假情况;确定两年期间的发病情况和区分性轨迹。
Occup Environ Med. 2017 Feb;74(2):114-122. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-103624. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
6
Long-term patterns of chronic complaints of the arms, neck, and shoulders and their determinants--the Doetinchem Cohort Study.手臂、颈部和肩部慢性不适的长期模式及其决定因素——多廷赫姆队列研究。
Pain. 2016 May;157(5):1114-1121. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000488.
7
Instruments for assessment of impairments and activity limitations in patients with hand conditions: A European Delphi study.手部疾病患者功能障碍和活动受限评估工具:一项欧洲德尔菲研究。
J Rehabil Med. 2015 Nov;47(10):948-56. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2015.
8
Prognostic factors of complaints of arm, neck, and/or shoulder: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies.手臂、颈部和/或肩部疼痛的预后因素:前瞻性队列研究的系统评价
Pain. 2015 May;156(5):765-788. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000117.
9
Construct Validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation in Patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders.挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者功能能力评估的结构效度
J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Sep;25(3):481-92. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9555-0.
10
The reproducibility of two task-specific functional capacity evaluation protocols for household waste collectors.针对家庭垃圾收集者的两种特定任务功能能力评估方案的可重复性。
Work. 2015 Jun 5;51(2):307-14. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141851.