Haughton Sophie, Riley David, Berry Simon, Arshad Muhammad Fahad, Eleftheriadou Aikaterini, Anson Matthew, Yap Yew Wen, Cuthbertson Daniel J, Malik Rayaz A, Azmi Shazli, Alam Uazman, Iqbal Ahmed
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.
Diabetes & Endocrinology Research, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool and Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Aug;27(8):4239-4247. doi: 10.1111/dom.16455. Epub 2025 May 19.
Clinical trials have demonstrated the benefits of insulin pump therapy compared with multiple daily injections (MDI) in type 1 diabetes. However, contemporaneous real-world data are limited. This study investigated the real-world impact of insulin pump therapy compared with MDI.
A retrospective cohort study of adults with type 1 diabetes was performed on the TriNetX platform, a global network providing access to anonymised medical records. Outcomes analysed include HbA1c, diabetic ketoacidosis, macro- and microvascular complications and all-cause mortality. The five-year follow-up period, between January 2018 and March 2025, was divided into time windows for analysis.
95 122 individuals with type 1 diabetes were identified. After propensity score matching for confounders including age, ethnicity, gender, chronic kidney disease, retinopathy, HbA1c and microalbuminuria, 17 124 patients remained in both the pump and MDI cohorts. The absolute reduction in HbA1c was comparable at five years (-5.3 mmol/mol [-0.5%] in the pump group and -4.5 mmol/mol [-0.4%] in MDI). Overall mortality was lower (RR = 0.716 [95% CI 0.639-0.803], p < 0.001) in those on a pump compared to MDI. The occurrence of diabetic ketoacidosis was lower in the pump group compared to MDI (RR = 0.848 [95% CI 0.786-0.915], p < 0.001). The risk of diabetic retinopathy was increased in the pump group (RR = 1.331 [95% CI 1.247-1.420], p < 0.001).
Insulin pump therapy was associated with lower all-cause mortality and risk of diabetic ketoacidosis, but an increased risk of diabetic retinopathy compared with MDI. This result should be interpreted with caution due to potential differences in retinal screening frequency and subsequent bias.
临床试验已证明,与多次皮下注射(MDI)相比,胰岛素泵治疗对1型糖尿病患者有益。然而,同期的真实世界数据有限。本研究调查了胰岛素泵治疗与MDI相比在现实世界中的影响。
在TriNetX平台上对成年1型糖尿病患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,该平台是一个提供匿名医疗记录访问的全球网络。分析的结果包括糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、糖尿病酮症酸中毒、大血管和微血管并发症以及全因死亡率。2018年1月至2025年3月的五年随访期被划分为分析时间窗。
共识别出95122例1型糖尿病患者。在对年龄、种族、性别、慢性肾病、视网膜病变、HbA1c和微量白蛋白尿等混杂因素进行倾向得分匹配后,胰岛素泵组和MDI组各有17124例患者。五年时HbA1c的绝对降低幅度相当(胰岛素泵组为-5.3 mmol/mol [-0.5%],MDI组为-4.5 mmol/mol [-0.4%])。与MDI相比,使用胰岛素泵的患者总体死亡率更低(风险比[RR]=0.716 [95%置信区间0.639-0.803],p<0.001)。与MDI相比,胰岛素泵组糖尿病酮症酸中毒的发生率更低(RR=0.848 [95%置信区间0.786-0.915],p<0.001)。胰岛素泵组糖尿病视网膜病变的风险增加(RR=1.331 [95%置信区间1.247-1.420],p<0.001)。
与MDI相比,胰岛素泵治疗与较低的全因死亡率和糖尿病酮症酸中毒风险相关,但糖尿病视网膜病变风险增加。由于视网膜筛查频率的潜在差异和后续偏差,对这一结果应谨慎解读。